<b><i>Background:</i></b> Endobronchial ultrasound elastography that provides information on tissue stiffness may help distinguish malignant from benign mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> In this prospective trial, we assessed the diagnostic value of elastographic images and the interobserver agreement in its evaluation. <b><i>Method:</i></b> Elastographic images from 77 lymph nodes in 65 patients were reviewed by 3 pneumologists. The elastographic image was classified based on the predominant colour: predominantly green, intermediary, and predominantly blue. With 2 or 3 interobserver matches, the corresponding elastographic image was correlated with the pathological result obtained from endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and/or other invasive procedures. <b><i>Results:</i></b> All 3 reviewers had agreement in classifying elastographic images in 45% (35/77). Overall, the interobserver agreement among the 3 readers for classifying elastographic pattern was found to be moderate (Fleiss Kappa index = 0.519; 95% CI = [0.427; 0.611]). On cytological/histological evaluation, 55 lymph nodes were malignant and 22 were benign. In classifying “green” as benign and “blue” as malignant, the sensitivity and specificity were 71% (95% CI = [54%; 85%]) and 67% (95%-CI = [35%; 90%]), respectively. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Elastography will not replace invasive EBUS-TBNA due to a moderate interobserver agreement and insufficient sensitivity and specificity. However, elastography will, maybe, present an additional feature to identify malignant lymph nodes in the context of clinical, radiological, and cytological results.
Background: Fibrosing, non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (non-IPF) interstitial lung diseases (fILDs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by a different amount of inflammation and fibrosis. Therapy is currently based on corticosteroids and/or immunomodulators. However, response to these therapies is highly variable, sometimes without meaningful improvement, especially in more fibrosing forms. Pirfenidone and nintedanib have recently demonstrated to reduce functional decline in patients with IPF. However, their antifibrotic mechanism makes these two drugs an interesting approach for treatment of fibrosing ILDs other than IPF. Objectives: We here report our experience with antifibrotic drugs in fibrosing non-IPF ILDs patients having a progressive phenotype during immunosuppressive therapy. Methods: Patients with a multidisciplinary team diagnosis of fibrosing non-IPF ILDs experiencing a progressive phenotype during treatment with corticosteroids and/or immunomodulators between October-2014 and January-2018 at our tertiary referral Center for ILDs were retrospectively analyzed. Antifibrotic therapy was administered after application with the respective health insurance company and after consent by the patient. Pulmonary-functiontests and follow-up visits were performed every 6 ± 1 months. Results: Eleven patients were treated with antifibrotic drugs (8 males, mean age 62 ± 12.8 years, mean FVC% 62.8 ± 22.3, mean DLCO% 35.5 ± 10.7, median follow-up under antifibrotic treatment 11.1 months). Patients had a diagnosis of unclassifiable ILD in 6 cases, pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis in 2 cases, idiopathic-NSIP in 1 case, asbestos-related ILD in 1 case and Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome in 1 case. Treatment before antifibrotics consisted of corticosteroids in all patients: 5 combined with Azathioprin, 1 with either methotrexate or cyclophosphamide (i.v.). Ten patients were treated with pirfenidone (2403 mg/die) and 1 with nintedanib (300 mg/die). Median FVC was 56, 56, 50%, at time points − 24, − 12, − 6 before initiation, 44% at time of initiation and 46.5% at 6 months after initiation of antifibrotic treatment. Antifibrotic treatment was generally well tolerated with a need of dose reduction in 2 cases (rash and nausea) and early termination in 3 cases. Conclusions: Antifibrotic treatment may be a valuable treatment option in patients with progressive fibrosing non-IPF ILD if currently no other treatment options exist. However, prospective, randomized clinical trials are urgently needed to assess the real impact of antifibrotic therapy in these patients.
The review summarizes the various endoscopic treatment approaches for managment of COPD and emphysema, their mechanism of action, their complications and the current available results of the most important RCTs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.