Introduction: BackgroundDuring the pandemic, health professionals had the unprecedented experience of dealing with a newdisease with high contagiousness and mortality. The workload, but also the fear of disease management, caused significant levels of stress. Each employee managed stress in his own way. This study detects the level of stress experienced by health workers during the pandemic and the coping strategies they selected accordingly.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the coping strategies used by health professionals during the pandemic of coronavirus.MethodsThe sample comprised 180 health professionals that were working in a public hospital. The data collection tool was an anonymous questionnaire consisting of socio-demographic questions, the Toulouse Scale for coping , and a sub questionnaire to explore health professionals’ views on the pandemic.ResultsWomen (73.9%), young individuals (50.6% are up to 35 years old) and TEI graduates (53.9%) predominate in the sample. The sample consisted mainly of nurses (68.3%) and the great majority were contract workers (67%).The most frequently used dimensions were “Active focus” (Average 3.91/5.00), “Acceptance” (3.86), “Cognitive Control and Planning” (3.61) and “Social Information Support” (3.60).Also, health workers used more often the strategies of “Social support” (3.45), “Control” (3.33) and “Focus” (3.23), while they use the “Withdrawal” strategy less often (2.25). Finally, respondents used “Positive strategies” more often (3.54) than negative ones.ConclusionsThe health professionals in the present study preferred to ask for information and use cognitive and informative strategies more often and, to a lesser extent, they were overwhelmed by their emotions. The strategies of social support, control and focus were used more often, while the strategy of withdrawal was selected less often. Furthermore, positive strategies were used to a greater extent.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared
The energy drinks are beverages that contain caffeine and are consumed by students, children, adolescents and young adults to enhance their athletic and cognitive performance. Significant adverse effects have been reported. They vary from mild symptoms to death. The present study attempts to assess the risk of using energy drinks by exercisers and athletes. In order to achieve this, we evaluate the consumption and knowledge level of the consumers. The lack of awareness can lead to dangerous practices. Views on appropriate public health protection measures are also being investigated. The grade of consumption (35.5%) is within the bounds of the literature. The main source of knowledge is the advertisement (69.2%), which does not guarantee objective information. Therefore, although exercisers and athletes believe that they have adequate knowledge on the subject (91.2%), in fact this is not the case (the knowledge score is 10.12/18). Thus, half of them consume concurrently energy drinks with alcohol (a perilous practice). The study emphasizes the need of taking measures for public health protection.
Objectives: The objectives of the study are what is the degree of registration of educators, what is the attitude of educators about organ donation, and what are the factors related to the decision to donate. Methods: It is a quantitative cross-sectional study using a structured questionnaire. A sample consisted of 208 teachers with the greater predominance of women. Logarithmic regression was applied to determine the effect of demographics, knowledge evaluation, and evaluation of views toward the possibility of registration in the body donor register. Results: Out of the participants, 7.5% are registered in the organ donor and 20.5% are active body donors. One in two wants to become an organ donor. The views evaluation on a scale with a minimum of 23 and a maximum of 115 was 87.58 (9.62). The knowledge evaluation on a scale with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 6 was 2.17 (1.46). The underlying impression of participants on their knowledge of organ donation on a scale of 1–6 was 3.18 (1.47). The 45–50 age group is 19.9 times more likely to be registered and the evaluation of views increases. Conclusion: The degree of registration in donor registers (7.5%) is considered low. The assessment of attitudes 87.58 and knowledge 2.17 (1.46) is considered also insufficient. The main source of knowledge is the media. It is necessary to increase the contribution of more reliable sources (academic studies, ministry, and information actions).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.