Context
Pre-operative localisation studies are standard practice in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). The most common modalities are neck ultrasound (US) and sestamibi scanning. However, the nature of pHPT is changing, with imaging increasingly yielding negative results. Numerous studies suggest unlocalised disease is associated with poor outcomes, calling into question whether such patients are best treated conservatively.
Objective
This study aims to correlate parathyroidectomy outcomes with pre-operative imaging in a single, high-volume institution.
Methods
Data from a prospectively maintained departmental database of operations performed from 2017-2019 was analysed. All patients undergoing first-time surgery for sporadic pHPT were included. Data collected included patient demographics, pre-operative imaging, surgical strategy, and post-operative outcomes.
Results
A total of 609 consecutive parathyroidectomies were included, with a median age of 59 years (range 20-87 years). The all-comer cure rate was 97.5%; this was 97.9% in dual localised patients (those with positive US and sestamibi), compared to 95.8% in the dual unlocalised group (those with negative US and sestamibi) (p=0.33). Unilateral neck exploration was the chosen approach in 59.9% of patients with double positive imaging and 5.7% of patients with double negative imaging (otherwise, bilateral parathyroid visualisation was performed). There was no significant difference in post-operative complications between patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral neck exploration.
Conclusions
Patients with negative pre-operative imaging who undergo parathyroidectomy are cured in almost 96% of cases, compared to 98% when the disease is localised. This difference does not reach statistical or clinical significance. These findings therefore support current recommendations that all patients with pHPT who are likely to benefit from operative intervention should be considered for parathyroidectomy, irrespective of pre-operative imaging findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.