Circadian rhythms in most living organisms are regulated by light and synchronized to an endogenous biological clock. The circadian clock machinery is also critically involved in regulating and fine-tuning neurodevelopmental processes. Circadian disruption during embryonic development can impair crucial phases of neurodevelopment. This can contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders like autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the offspring. Increasing evidence from studies showing abnormalities in sleep and melatonin as well as genetic and epigenetic changes in the core elements of the circadian pathway indicate a pivotal role of circadian disruption in ASD. However, the underlying mechanistic basis through which the circadian pathways influence the risk and progression of ASD are yet to be fully discerned. Well-recognized mechanistic pathways in ASD include altered immune-inflammatory, nitro oxidative stress, neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity, and metabolic pathways. Notably, all these pathways are under the control of the circadian clock. It is thus likely that a disrupted circadian clock will affect the functioning of these pathways. Herein, we highlight the possible mechanisms through which aberrations in the circadian clock might affect immune-inflammatory, nitro-oxidative, metabolic pathways, and neurotransmission, thereby driving the neurobiological sequelae leading to ASD.

Background: Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a rapidly progressive primary tauopathy characterized by vertical gaze palsy, postural instability, and mild dementia. PSP shows high clinical and pathologic heterogeneity. Although a few risk factors exist, such as advanced age and environmental toxins, the precise etiology remains largely elusive. Compelling evidence now suggests that genetic background plays a pivotal role in the pathogenetic pathways of PSP. Notably, PSP is genetically and phenotypically a complex disorder. Given the tau pathology, several studies in the past have identified microtubule-associated protein tau ( MAPT) gene mutations/variations and its haplotype as the major genetic risk factor of PSP, both in the sporadic and the familial forms. Subsequently, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) also identified several novel risk variants. However, these genetic risk determinants fail to explain the pathogenetic basis of PSP and its phenotypic spectrum in majority of the cases. Some genetic variants are known to confer the risk, while others seem to act as modifier genes. Summary: Besides the complex genetic basis of PSP, the pathobiological mechanisms, differential diagnosis, and management of patients with PSP have further been complicated by genetic conditions that mimic the phenotypes of PSP. This is now becoming increasingly apparent that interactions between genetic and environmental factors significantly contribute to PSP development. Further, the effect of environmental factors seems to be mediated through epigenetic modifications. Key message: Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of the genetic and epigenetic constructs of PSP and highlight the relevance of genetic and epigenetic findings in the pathobiology of PSP.

Background The IL‐33/ST2 immune axis plays crucial roles in infection and immunity. A dysregulated IL‐33/ST2 axis can induce autoimmune reaction and inflammatory responses. Guillain‐Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute peripheral neuropathy, mostly caused by post‐infection autoimmunity. The role of IL‐33/ST2 axis is not known in GBS. This study aimed to explore the role of IL‐33/ST2 axis in GBS. Methods Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of Il33 gene (rs16924159, rs7044343, rs1342336) and three SNPs of Il1rl1 gene (rs10192157, rs1041973, rs10206753) coding for suppressor of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) were genotyped in 179 GBS patients and 186 healthy controls by TaqMan Allelic Discrimination Assay. Plasma levels of IL‐33 and sST2 were measured in a subset of GBS patients (n = 80) and healthy controls (n = 80) by ELISA. Results The frequencies of CC genotype of rs10192157 (p = 0.043) and TT genotype of rs10206753 (p = 0.036) SNPs of Il1rl1 gene differed significantly between GBS patients and healthy controls. Gene–gene interaction between Il33 and Il1rl1 genes also conferred significant risk for GBS. In addition, the plasma sST2 levels were significantly elevated in GBS patients compared to healthy subjects (24,934.31 ± 1.81 pg/ml vs. 12,518.97 ± 1.51 pg/ml, p < 0.001). Plasma sST2 levels showed a significant correlation with the disability scores at the peak of neurological deficit in GBS patients. Conclusions The IL‐33/ST2 axis is suggested to influence the immunopathogenesis of GBS. Genetic variants of Il1rl1 gene might serve as a risk determinant of GBS and plasma sST2 levels might emerge as a biomarker of severity of GBS, if replicated further by other studies.

No abstract

No abstract