Objective: The purpose of this study is to understand the incidence, related factors, and the prognosis factors in order to avoid risk, proper method of diagnosis and treatment and reduce complications and provide the basis. Methods: 85 Vulvar cancer (VC) patients treated in our hospital from 2002.10 to 2012.10 were collected and analyzed by retrospective comparative methods. SPSS19.0 application software was used for the statistical analysis. The clinical data are analyzed by chi-square and F test statistic methods. P < 0.05 was a significant difference between the judgment standard. Results: During 10 years, we treated 3391 cases of the primary malignant tumors including 85 VC cases; VC was 2.89% (85/3391). The age was between 24~88 years old, mean was 57.09±12.93 yrs. old, variable age (F=6. 013, P=0.016<0.05). VC had seen more in rural than urban patients. By statistical analysis, region distribution in these two groups was remarkably different=4.16, P=0.045<0.05, but the urban proportion of patients in different years has no difference (χ2=0.080, P=0.777). Conclusion:The number of cases increased progressively in young age. VC patients were more in rural area than urban. High-risk groups Suggested doing regular physical exam. For long-term genital itching, genital tumor, genital ulcers, and other symptoms, should be alert to the possibility of VC. Preoperative diagnosis should be Colposcopic, biopsy in order to improve the accuracy of earlier diagnosis. Postoperative common complications are wound infection. Follow-up rate is low; It is difficult to say statistically survival rate is 5 years.
Objective of the study: To know the efficacy of transvaginal mesh repair augmented by synthetic polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse with objective and subjective result of the procedure. Material and methods: Evidence was gathered mostly about transvaginal synthetic polypropylene mesh using the search terms Transvaginal mesh, urinary incontinence, Mesh-complication, anterior prolapse, posterior prolapse, pelvic organ prolapse, vault prolapse, and mesh erosion-From April 2008 to March 2013. Online search range: Pub Med, Medline, RCT, Embase, database, Retrospective study and prospective study. Result: In vaginal Prolapse surgery, graft or mesh is used more frequently than traditional repairs, which has high failure rates. Vaginal approach of mesh placement and suspension of the upper part of the vagina is seen to be more appropriate and successful, showing effects similar to that of the invasive abdominal approach. Because of its lower failure rates it is recently supported by Cochrane review as well. To make such kinds of surgeries easier, more standard and least invasive vaginal kits are being upgraded. It is said that every surgeon can perform the procedure with mesh kits easily, but it is not so. It needs advance pelvic surgery skills, a lot to understand and the limitations of the technique as well. This current paper focuses the needs for the development of the kit, how to use it, results and complications till date and the techniques how to overcome the complications. Before recommending the technique for general use in all Prolapse patients, a lot of things like investigation on proper patient selection, continue research on graft composition, techniques that minimize complications of needle passes or mesh placement should be understood thoroughly. Apart from these we still should have more surgical skills to perform the procedures, to reduce complications and increase better results. Conclusion: Transvaginal repair using a synthetic polypropylene transvaginal mesh is a feasible and efficient procedure for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with less significant complications. Monofilament macro porous synthetic polypropylene mesh is effective, due to its low risk of infection and foreign body reaction. Proper patient selection is the best way to avoid unnecessary complications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.