Urinary tract infections are one of the most common hospital-acquired infections, with 70%-80% resulting from catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). We undertook a qualitative study to assess patient perspectives of indwelling urinary catheters using a semistructured interview. We found that patient awareness and patient engagement regarding indwelling urinary catheters and their consequences could be improved in the hospital setting. Implementing educational programs incorporating patient preferences for both health care workers and patients is likely to increase the involvement of patients in decision-making regarding urinary catheters and may lead to a decline in CAUTIs.
Background and Objectives: Pre-operative type and screen (T&S) is typically obtained if a patient is expected to require a blood transfusion; however, in cases of minimal blood loss, routine T&S may be unnecessary. The objective of our study was to examine the utility and cost of routine pre-operative T&S prior to minimally invasive hysterectomies (MIH). Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all MIH from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. Patient demographics and surgical parameters were abstracted. The proportion of MIH with a preoperative T&S was compared to the rate of peri-operative blood transfusion. Statistical tests were used where appropriate. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between pre-operative hemoglobin (Hgb) and peri-operative transfusion. Results: Patients (n = 307) with a mean age of 54 (standard deviation = 12.6) underwent MIH. T&S was ordered in 42.7% of cases, with 2.9% requiring a blood transfusion. Two-thirds of women receiving a transfusion had a history of anemia (p = .004). Women with a pre-operative Hgb < 10.6 gm/dL (n = 30) had a 27% probability of a transfusion, while those with a pre-operative Hgb > 10.6 gm/dL (n = 264) had a 99% probability of no transfusion. A T&S costs ∼$190 at our institution; if routine T&S was eliminated prior to MIH, cost savings is projected to be ∼$11,590 annually. Conclusion: Approximately 42.7% of MIH had T&S ordered, but only 2.9% received transfusions. Most patients who required a transfusion had a history of anemia. Significant cost savings could be incurred if routine T&S was eliminated prior to MIH.
OBJECTIVES: Cost-utility analyses need a measure to summarize the quality of life in a single index. A single score is often obtained by the EQ-5D questionnaire which is adaptable to each country with score tariffs. In clinical studies it is common to use questionnaires that measure the quality of life profile, such as the SF-36 psychometric questionnaire and then realized the mapping technique to obtain this utility score. Today no specific regression method has been recommended for a such mapping. The purpose of the study is to compare the different regression methods for the conversion of SF-36 into EQ-5D with a French database. METHODS: The EMOCAR study was a French cohort of patients with carotid endarterectomy where 904 adults completed both EQ-5D and SF-36 questionnaires. Ordinary least squares (OLS) and multinomial logit models were implemented to predict the overall score and the response to each of the 5 categories of EQ-5D with two types of specifications: item-based and summary score-based of SF-36. The performance of each model was determined by the estimated average score, the absolute and mean squared errors as well as the percentage of errors. RESULTS: The model including SF-36 items using OLS method has the most accurate predictions comparing to other models. This mapping performance was indicated by a significant prediction of EQ-5D score of 0.7327 and by MAE (0.116), MSE (0.026), R 2 (0.67) and the percentage of an absolute error > 0.1 (43.71%). The model including SF-36 dimensions scores predicted an EQ-5D score significantly different from the EQ-5D observed score. OLS models predicted better EQ-5D score of younger subgroups and multinomial model with SF-36 items older subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our models suggest that models using OLS method have good performance for mapping SF-36 onto EQ-5D. Low scores are underpredicted with both models which is already present in the existing literature.
Introduction In the United States, medical education on sexual medicine varies throughout the country and between institutions. With limited standardization, medical students and subsequent trainees have little to no training in how to approach a patient with concerns surrounding their sexual health. In 2018, half of the medical institutions in the United States required formal instruction in sexual medicine. Of those institutions that do include didactic material on sexual medicine, most of the material is dedicated to anatomy, physiology, and sexually transmitted infections, with limited or no information on sexual dysfunction and sexual history taking. Therefore, we identified a need to determine which components of sexual medicine, particularly female sexual medicine, are currently being covered in undergraduate medical education with the goal of proposing and developing standardized curriculum materials to be utilized by medical students during their preclinical education. Objective The aim of this study is to examine current preclinical curricula at all seven medical schools, including six allopathic and one osteopathic institution, in the Chicago, Illinois area to investigate which aspects of female sexual anatomy, physiology, pathology and pharmacology are being taught to medical students. Methods Curriculum materials on female sexual anatomy, physiology and pathology were collected from all seven medical schools in Chicago, Illinois. Courses covering topics on female sexual medicine varied between institutions due to differences in preclinical curriculum and coursework. To standardize our needs assessment, we utilized previous literature to identify specific components of anatomy, physiology, pathology, pharmacology, social sciences, and history and physical exam skills. Upon reviewing each institution's preclinical educational materials, we assessed curriculum content for saturation of specific concepts within each of the above areas. Results Curriculum materials were collected from seven (n=7) total medical schools in the surrounding Chicago, Illinois area. Out of the 7 institutions, 4/7 discussed clitoral anatomy, with 6/7 mentioning the glans, 1/7 mentioning the corona, 2/7 mentioning the clitoral hood, 6/7 mentioning the corpora cavernosa, 4/7 mentioning the corpus spongiosum, 6/7 mentioning the crus, 6/7 mentioning the bulb and 5/7 detailing the clitoral neurovasculature. In addition to the anatomy, 4/7 discussed the physiology of the female orgasm, 3/7 highlighted the rate and epidemiology of female sexual dysfunction (FSD), 3/7 included information on treatment for FSD, 1/7 taught a genitourinary physical exam specific to assessing FSD (external exam, internal exam, pelvic floor assessment), and 6/7 institutions included information on how to take a sexual history asking about sexual function, pleasure, and satisfaction. Conclusion Overall, our focused needs assessment of both allopathic and osteopathic medical schools in the Chicago, Illinois area highlights the need for restructuring of curriculum as it pertains to female sexual medicine and FSD in undergraduate medical education. Next steps include proposing individual curricular recommendations to institutions, due to the variation in current curriculum design, as to how they can better teach on areas surrounding FSD, while also aiming to standardize what medical students are learning during their preclinical years. Disclosure Work supported by industry: no.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.