Two different tools for assessing pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of mathematics teachers used in the framework of the COACTIV study are systematically compared in this paper, namely the paper-and-pencil test consisting of items on the three facets knowledge of explaining and representation, knowledge of student thinking and typical mistakes, and knowledge of the potential of mathematical tasks, and the video vignettes instrument that examines teachers' proposed continuations for presented lesson video clips specific to their subject-related and methodological competence aspects. Initially, both COACTIV PCK assessment tools are systematically contrasted for the first time with respect to their predictive validity for instructional quality (N = 163 German secondary mathematics teachers) as well as student learning gains (N = 3806 PISA students from 169 different classes) by means of path models showing that PCK, when assessed by the paper-and-pencil method, can better predict instructional quality than the video vignettes instrument can. Next, we theoretically propose the cascade model as capable of integrating pertinent theories on teacher competence and instructional quality. This model implies five 'columns' that are ordered according to a sequential causal chain (teacher disposition → situation-specific skills → observable teaching behavior → student mediation → learning gains). Finally, we specify four out of the five 'columns' of this cascade model, based empirically on the COACTIV data.
Bayesian Reasoning is both a fundamental idea of probability and a key model in applied sciences for evaluating situations of uncertainty. Bayesian Reasoning may be defined as the dealing with, and understanding of, Bayesian situations. This includes various aspects such as calculating a conditional probability (performance), assessing the effects of changes to the parameters of a formula on the result (covariation) and adequately interpreting and explaining the results of a formula (communication). Bayesian Reasoning is crucial in several non-mathematical disciplines such as medicine and law. However, even experts from these domains struggle to reason in a Bayesian manner. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a training course for this specific audience regarding the different aspects of Bayesian Reasoning. In this paper, we present an evidence-based development of such training courses by considering relevant prior research on successful strategies for Bayesian Reasoning (e.g., natural frequencies and adequate visualizations) and on the 4C/ID model as a promising instructional approach. The results of a formative evaluation are described, which show that students from the target audience (i.e., medicine or law) increased their Bayesian Reasoning skills and found taking part in the training courses to be relevant and fruitful for their professional expertise.
ZusammenfassungIn stochastischen Situationen mit zwei dichotomen Merkmalen erlauben weder die schulüblichen Baumdiagramme noch Vierfeldertafeln die simultane Darstellung sämtlicher in der Situation möglicher Wahrscheinlichkeiten. Das im vorliegenden Beitrag vorgestellte Netz hat die Kapazität, alle vier möglichen Randwahrscheinlichkeiten, alle vier Schnittwahrscheinlichkeiten sowie alle acht bedingten Wahrscheinlichkeiten gleichzeitig darzustellen. Darüber hinaus ist – aufgrund der Knoten-Ast-Struktur des Netzes – die simultane Darstellung von Wahrscheinlichkeiten und absoluten Häufigkeiten mit dieser Visualisierung ebenfalls möglich. Bei der sukzessiven Erweiterung des typischen Baumdiagramms zunächst zum Doppelbaum und schließlich zum Netz sinkt der Inferenzgrad (d. h. weniger kognitive Schritte sind erforderlich) z. B. für Fragen nach bedingten Wahrscheinlichkeiten, aber gleichzeitig steigt die Komplexität der Darstellung und somit die extrinsische kognitive Belastung. Im vorliegenden Artikel erfolgt zunächst ein theoretischer Vergleich dieser Knoten-Ast-Strukturen. Eine anschließende Studie illustriert, dass sich die sukzessive Erweiterung bereits vollständig ausgefüllter Diagramme positiv auf die Performanz von N = 269 Schülerinnen und Schülern auswirkt. Obwohl Häufigkeitsdoppelbäume und Häufigkeitsnetze den Schülerinnen und Schülern gänzlich unbekannt waren, unterstützten diese Visualisierungen die Schülerinnen und Schüler bei der Bearbeitung der Aufgaben am meisten.
Patients need to be informed correctly and comprehensibly about the implications of their medical test results. Reasoning in such situations, where, for example, a medical test result is used to make inferences on a particular disease, is called Bayesian reasoning. Prior research mostly concentrated on the ability to correctly calculate risks in Bayesian situations (so-called performance) and repeatedly demonstrated that performance is very low—even among medical experts. The need to also study communication within Bayesian situations has been brought forward. Here, we broaden the focus of Bayesian reasoning and present first insights into a study where medical students participated in a training course on the aspect of performance and show that this already improves the ability to judge doctor–patient communication within Bayesian situations.
Questions involving Bayesian Reasoning often arise in events of everyday life, such as assessing the results of a breathalyser test or a medical diagnostic test. Bayesian Reasoning is perceived to be difficult, but visualisations are known to support it. However, prior research on visualisations for Bayesian Reasoning has only rarely addressed the issue on how to design such visualisations in the most effective way according to research on multimedia learning. In this article, we present a concise overview on subject-didactical considerations, together with the most fundamental research of both Bayesian Reasoning and multimedia learning. Building on these aspects, we provide a step-by-step development of the design of visualisations which support Bayesian problems, particularly for so-called double-trees and unit squares.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.