Major problems in stem cell biology revolve around defining the developmental potential of cell populations and understanding how their potential is maintained or progressively restricted. Oxygen (O(2)) is an obvious environmental factor which has received little attention in culturing skeletal muscle progenitor cells. In this work, we examine the effects of O(2) levels on the developmental potential, proliferative capacity, and phenotype of the adult skeletal muscle fiber progenitor population (satellite cells), and cell lines that model multipotential embryonic paraxial mesoderm from which skeletal muscle develops. Both satellite cell proliferation and survival of mature fibers increased in physiologic (6%) O(2) vs. non-physiologic 20% O(2) used in virtually all traditional cell culture. Six percent O(2) conditions also accelerated the up-regulation of multiple MyoD family myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs). An unexpected finding was that fiber-adherent satellite cells could assume a non-myogenic phenotype. By the criteria of molecular markers and gross lipid accumulation, satellite cells were found to assume an adipocyte phenotype, and did so more prominently in 20% O(2) than in physiologic O(2). Selection of the adipogenic fate and execution of adipogenesis by multipotential mesenchymal cell lines was also dramatically higher in traditional 20 vs. 6% O(2), and decreased adipogenesis in physiologic O(2) was associated with significantly less expression of the adipogenic regulator, PPAR gamma. These results suggest that regulatory pathways affected by O(2) are important for satellite cell proliferation, execution of cell fate, and parent muscle survival in culture, and so may play a role in vivo under normal or pathologic conditions.
Human embryonic stem cell (hESC) culture is routinely performed using inactivated mouse embryonic fi broblasts (MEFs) as a feeder cell layer (FL). Although these cells maintain pluripotency of hESCs, the molecular basis for this is unknown. Objectives of this study were to determine whether timing between MEF inactivation and their use as a FL infl uenced hESC growth and differentiation, and to begin defi ning the mechanism(s) involved. hESCs were plated on MEFs prepared 1 (MEF-1), 4 (MEF-4), and 7 (MEF-7) days earlier. hESC colony morphology and Oct3/4 expression levels were evaluated to determine the infl uence of different FLs. Signifi cant enhancement of hESC growth (self-renewal) was observed on MEF-1 compared with MEF-4 and/or MEF-7. Conditioned media (CM) collected from MEF-1 supported signifi cantly better hESC growth in a FL-free system compared to MEF-7 CM. Effects of MEFs on hESC growth were not caused by differences in cell density or viability, although indications of apoptosis were observed in MEF-7. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated that MEF-7 were morphologically distinct from MEF-1 and MEF-4. Microarray analysis identifi ed 19 genes related to apoptosis with signifi cantly different levels of expression between MEF-1 and MEF-7. Several differentially expressed RNAs had gene ontology classifi cations associated with extracellular matrix (ECM) structural constituents and growth factors. Because members of Wnt signaling pathway were identifi ed in the array analysis, we examined the ability of the Wnt1 CM and secreted frizzled-related proteins to affect hESC growth and differentiation. The addition of Wnt1 CM to both MEF-1 and MEF-7 signifi cantly increased the number of undifferentiated colonies, while the addition of Sfrps promoted differentiation. Together, these results suggest that microenvironment, ECM, and soluble factors expressed by MEF-1 are signifi cantly better at maintaining self-renewal and pluripotency of hESCs. Our fi ndings have important implications in the optimization of hESC culture when MEFs are used as FL or CM is used in FL-free culture.
RNAi offers the opportunity to examine the role in postimplantation development of genes that cause preimplantation lethality and to create allelic series of targeted embryos. We have delivered constituitively expressed short hairpin (sh) RNAs to pregnant mice during the early postimplantation period of development and observed gene knockdown and defects that phenocopy the null embryo. We have silenced genes that have not yet been “knocked out” in the mouse (geminin and Wnt8b), those required during earlier cleavage stages of development (nanog), and genes required at implantation (Bmp4, Bmp7) singly and in combination (Bmp4 + Bmp7), and obtained unique phenotypes. We have also determined a role in postimplantation development of two transcripts identified in a differential display RT-PCR screen of genes induced in ES cells by noggin exposure, Aggf1 and an Est (GenBank AK008955). Systemic delivery of shRNAs provides a valuable approach to gene silencing in the embryo.
Geminin is a nuclear protein that performs the related functions of modulating cell cycle progression by binding Cdt1, and controlling differentiation by binding transcription factors. Since embryonic stem cells (ESC) and the epiblast share a similar gene expression profile and an attenuated cell cycle, ESC form an accessible and tractable model system to study lineage choice at gastrulation. We derived several ESC lines in which Geminin can be inducibly expressed, and employed short hairpin RNAs targeting Geminin. As in the embryo, a lack of Geminin protein resulted in DNA damage and cell death. In monolayer culture, in defined medium, Geminin supported neural differentiation; however, in three-dimensional culture, overexpression of Geminin promoted mesendodermal differentiation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. In vitro, ESC overexpressing Geminin rapidly recolonized a wound, downregulated E-cadherin expression, and activated Wnt signaling. We suggest that Geminin may promote differentiation via binding Groucho/TLE proteins and upregulating canonical Wnt signaling.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.