A routine method to determine total haemoglobin mass (tHb) in clinical practice and sports medicine is non-existent. Radioactive tracers or other dilution procedures like the common CO-rebreathing method (Proc(com)) are impractical, the latter in particular because of the relatively long time of respiration. According to the multicompartment model of Bruce and Bruce (J Appl Physiol 95:1235-1247, 2003) the respiration time can be considerably reduced by inhaling a CO-bolus instead of the commonly used gas mixture. The aim of this study was to evaluate this theoretical concept in practice. The kinetics of the HbCO formation were compared in arterialised blood sampled from an hyperaemic earlobe after inhaling a CO-bolus (Proc(new)) for 2 min and a CO-O(2) mixture (Proc(com)) for approximately 10 min. The reliability of Proc(new) was checked in three consecutive tests, and phlebotomy was used to determine the validity. VO(2max) was determined with and without previous application of Proc(new) and the half-time of HbCO was registered also in arterialised blood after resting quietly and after the VO(2max) test. Proc(new) yielded virtual identical tHb values compared to Proc(com) when HbCO determined 5 min after starting CO-rebreathing was used for calculation. The typical error of Proc(new) was 1.7%, corresponding to a limit of agreement (95%) of 3.3%. The loss of 95 g (19) haemoglobin was detected with an accuracy of 9 g (12). After application of Proc(new) VO(2max) was reduced by 3.0% (3.7) (P=0.022) and half-time was lowered from 132 min (77) to 89 min (23) after the VO(2max) test. Inhaling a CO-bolus markedly simplifies the CO-rebreathing method without reducing validity and reliability and can be used for routine determination of tHb for various indications.
Training and hypoxia-associated changes in maximal oxygen uptake are mediated by different blood adaptations. Training increases blood volume because of plasma and red cell volume expansion, resulting in increased cardiac output, whereas hypoxia increases only red cell volume, leading to increased hemoglobin concentration and oxygen transport capacity. Blood doping mimics the altitude effects, however, by far exceeding its magnitude.
Total haemoglobin mass can be easily measured by applying the optimised CO-rebreathing method (oCOR-method). Prerequisite for its accurate determination is a homogenous CO distribution in the blood and the exact knowledge of the CO volume circulating in the vascular space. The aim of the study was to evaluate the mixing time of CO in the blood after inhaling a CO-bolus and to quantify the CO volume leaving the vascular bed due to diffusion to myoglobin and due to exhalation during processing the oCOR-method. The oCOR-method was also compared to a former commonly used CO-rebreathing procedure. In ten subjects, the time course of carboxy-haemoglobin (HbCO) formation was analysed simultaneously in capillary and venous blood for a period of 15 min after inhaling a CO bolus. The volume of CO diffusing from haemoglobin to myoglobin was calculated via the decrease of HbCO. As part of this decrease is due to CO exhalation, this volume was quantified by collecting the exhaled air in a Douglas bag system. Equal HbCO values in capillary and venous blood were reached at min 6 indicating complete mixing of CO. The loss of CO out of the vascular bed due to exhalation and due to diffusion to myoglobin was 0.32 +/- 0.12% min(-1) (0.25 +/- 0.09 ml min(-1)) and 0.32 +/- 0.18% min(-1) (0.24 +/- 0.13 ml min(-1)) of the administered CO volume, respectively. The loss of CO due to exhalation and diffusion to myoglobin is of minor impact. It should, however, be considered by using correction factors to obtain high accuracy when determining total haemoglobin mass.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.