No abstract

Computational methods to predict molecular properties regarding safety and toxicology represent alternative approaches to expedite drug development, screen environmental chemicals, and thus significantly reduce associated time and costs. There is a strong need and interest in the development of computational methods that yield reliable predictions of toxicity, and many approaches, including the recently introduced deep neural networks, have been leveraged towards this goal. Herein, we report on the collection, curation, and integration of data from the public data sets that were the source of the ChemIDplus database for systemic acute toxicity. These efforts generated the largest publicly available such data set comprising > 80,000 compounds measured against a total of 59 acute systemic toxicity end points. This data was used for developing multiple singleand multitask models utilizing random forest, deep neural networks, convolutional, and graph convolutional neural network approaches. For the first time, we also reported the consensus models based on different multitask approaches. To the best of our knowledge, prediction models for 36 of the 59 end points have never been published before. Furthermore, our results demonstrated a significantly better performance of the consensus model obtained from three multitask learning approaches that particularly predicted the 29 smaller tasks (less than 300 compounds) better than other models developed in the study. The curated data set and the developed models have been made publicly available at https://github.com/ncats/ld50-multitask, https://predictor.ncats.io/, and https://cactus.nci.nih.gov/download/acute-toxicity-db (data set only) to support regulatory and research applications.

Robust and efficient processes are needed to establish scientific confidence in new approach methodologies (NAMs) if they are to be considered for regulatory applications. NAMs need to be fit for purpose, reliable and, for the assessment of human health effects, provide information relevant to human biology. They must also be independently reviewed and transparently communicated. Ideally, NAM developers should communicate with stakeholders such as regulators and industry to identify the question(s), and specified purpose that the NAM is intended to address, and the context in which it will be used. Assessment of the biological relevance of the NAM should focus on its alignment with human biology, mechanistic understanding, and ability to provide information that leads to health protective decisions, rather than solely comparing NAM-based chemical testing results with those from traditional animal test methods. However, when NAM results are compared to historical animal test results, the variability observed within animal test method results should be used to inform performance benchmarks. Building on previous efforts, this paper proposes a framework comprising five essential elements to establish scientific confidence in NAMs for regulatory use: fitness for purpose, human biological relevance, technical characterization, data integrity and transparency, and independent review. Universal uptake of this framework would facilitate the timely development and use of NAMs by the international community. While this paper focuses on NAMs for assessing human health effects of pesticides and industrial chemicals, many of the suggested elements are expected to apply to other types of chemicals and to ecotoxicological effect assessments.

Conflict of Interest Statement: MTS has received consulting fees from attorneys representing plaintiffs in cases involving exposure to benzene, glyphosate and other chemical agents. DWF has received consulting fees from attorneys in cases involving exposure to asbestos, PCBs, TCE and other chemical agents. SM and HL are employees of Amgen. MF was an employee of Amgen during the initial meetings and is currently an employee of Expansion Therapeutics. The other authors declare no competing interests. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of their respective institutions. Reference to commercial products or services does not constitute endorsement. Manuscript word count: excluding references, tables and figure 6,883.Figure and tables; Manuscript figures: 1; Manuscript tables: 2

dossier to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) containing an extensive list of data on the intrinsic properties of a substance, ranging from chemical characterization and physicochemical properties to toxicological and ecotoxicological data, with increasing demands depending on the tonnage band of the quantity of the substance placed on the market. In addition, registrants should collect information on use and exposure to perform a chemical safety assessment (CSA) based on the toxicity profile of the substance. The minimum data requirements are described in Annexes VI-X of the regulation. For toxicological testing, the standard require-

Safety assessment is an essential component of the regulatory acceptance of industrial chemicals. Previously, we have developed a model to predict the skin sensitization potential of chemicals for two assays, the human patch test and murine local lymph node assay, and implemented this model in a web portal. Here, we report on the substantially revised and expanded freely available web tool, Pred-Skin version 3.0. This up-to-date version of Pred-Skin incorporates multiple quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models developed with in vitro, in chemico, and mice and human in vivo data, integrated into a consensus naïve Bayes model that predicts human effects. Individual QSAR models were generated using skin sensitization data derived from human repeat insult patch tests, human maximization tests, and mouse local lymph node assays. In addition, data for three validated alternative methods, the direct peptide reactivity assay, KeratinoSens, and the human cell line activation test, were employed as well. Models were developed using open-source tools and rigorously validated according to the best practices of QSAR modeling. Predictions obtained from these models were then used to build a naïve Bayes model for predicting human skin sensitization with the following external prediction accuracy: correct classification rate (89%), sensitivity (94%), positive predicted value (91%), specificity (84%), and negative predicted value (89%). As an additional assessment of model performance, we identified 11 cosmetic ingredients known to cause skin sensitization but were not included in our training set, and nine of them were accurately predicted as sensitizers by our models. Pred-Skin can be used as a reliable alternative to animal tests for predicting human skin sensitization.

No abstract

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is one of the most prevalent public health concerns, and mounting evidence supports the contribution of environmental chemicals to CV disease burden. In this study, we performed cardiotoxicity profiling for the Tox21 chemical library by focusing on high-throughput screening (HTS) assays whose targets are associated with adverse events related to CV failure modes. Our objective was to develop new hypotheses around environmental chemicals of potential interest for adverse CV outcomes using Tox21/ToxCast HTS data. Molecular and cellular events linked to six failure modes of CV toxicity were cross-referenced with 1399 Tox21/ToxCast assays to identify cardio-relevant bioactivity signatures. The resulting 40 targets, measured in 314 assays, were integrated via a ToxPi visualization tool and ranking system to prioritize 1138 chemicals based upon formal integration across multiple domains of information. Filtering was performed based on cytotoxicity and generalized cell stress endpoints to try and isolate chemicals with effects specific to CV biology, and bioactivity- and structure-based clustering identified subgroups of chemicals preferentially affecting targets such as ion channels and vascular tissue biology. Our approach identified drugs with known cardiotoxic effects, such as estrogenic modulators like clomiphene and raloxifene, anti-arrhythmic drugs like amiodarone and haloperidol, and antipsychotic drugs like chlorpromazine. Several classes of environmental chemicals such as organotins, bisphenol-like chemicals, pesticides, and quaternary ammonium compounds demonstrated strong bioactivity against CV targets; these were compared to existing data in the literature (e.g., from cardio­myocytes, animal data, or human epidemiological studies) and prioritized for further testing.