Trainees and clinicians from high-income countries are increasingly engaging in global health (GH) efforts, particularly in resource-limited settings. Concomitantly, there is a growing demand for these individuals to be better prepared for the common challenges and controversies inherent in GH work. This is a state-of-the-art review article in which we outline what is known about the current scope of trainee and clinician involvement in GH experiences, highlight specific considerations and issues pertinent to GH engagement, and summarize preparation recommendations that have emerged from the literature. The article is focused primarily on short-term GH experiences, although much of the content is also pertinent to long-term work. Suggestions are made for the health care community to develop and implement widely endorsed preparation standards for trainees, clinicians, and organizations engaging in GH experiences and partnerships.

No abstract

BACKGROUND: Global health (GH) offerings by pediatric residency programs have increased significantly, with 1 in 4 programs indicating they offer a GH track. Despite growth of these programs, there is currently no widely accepted definition for what comprises a GH track in residency. METHODS: A panel of 12 pediatric GH education experts was assembled to use the Delphi method to work toward a consensus definition of a GH track and determine essential educational offerings, institutional supports, and outcomes to evaluate. The panelists completed 3 rounds of iterative surveys that were amended after each round on the basis of qualitative results. RESULTS: Each survey round had 100% panelist response. An accepted definition of a GH track was achieved during the second round of surveys. Consensus was achieved that at minimum, GH track educational offerings should include a longitudinal global child health curriculum, a GH rotation with international or domestic underserved experiences, predeparture preparation, preceptorship during GH electives, postreturn debrief, and scholarly output. Institutional supports should include resident salary support; malpractice, evacuation, and health insurance during GH electives; and a dedicated GH track director with protected time and financial and administrative support for program development and establishing partnerships. Key outcomes for evaluation of a GH track were agreed on. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus on the definition of a GH track, along with institutional supports and educational offerings, is instrumental in ensuring consistency in quality GH education among pediatric trainees. Consensus on outcomes for evaluation will help to create quality resident and program assessment tools.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Knowledge and skills related to global child health are increasingly recognized as important to the practice of pediatrics. However, little is known about the status and trends in global health (GH) education in US pediatric residency programs. Our aim was to measure trends in residents' exposure to GH training, their GH education assessments, and GH career plans. METHODS:We analyzed GH-focused questions from national American Academy of Pediatrics surveys of graduating residents in 2008 and 2016. Logistic regression was used to estimate changes over time by using derived predicted values. RESULTS:A total of 1100 graduating pediatric residents participated; response rates were 58.8% for 2008 and 56.0% for 2016. The percentage of residents reporting that their programs offered GH training grew from 59.1% in 2008 to 73.1% in 2016 (P < .001). The majority were somewhat likely, very likely, or definitely planning to work or volunteer in a low-or middle-income country after their residency (predicted value of 70.3% in 2008 and 69.4% in 2016; P = .76). Fourteen percent of respondents reported having completed an international elective in 2016; of those, 36.5% did not receive formal preparation before the experience, and 24.3% did not participate in debriefing sessions on return. Overall, 27.3% of respondents in 2016 reported excellent (8.8%) or very good (18.5%) GH training. CONCLUSIONS:Although a substantial percentage of pediatric residents participate in international electives and plan to include GH activities in their careers, gaps remain, including suboptimal preparation and debriefing for GH electives. abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Residency programs aiming to start a GH track should start by assessing the availability and sustainability of these identified essential factors within their program.

Purpose of Review Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), continues to affect individuals, communities, and health systems worldwide. Here, we highlight how COVID-19 threatens to jeopardize the tremendous gains made over the last few decades on improving children’s health globally. Recent Findings In contrast to adults, children with COVID-19 are less likely to develop severe disease requiring hospitalization or die as a direct result of infection. However, the pandemic will likely have other important health impacts disproportionately affecting vulnerable children globally. Possible effects include worsening of poverty and food insecurity; disruption of already strained routine child health services; damage to already imperiled healthcare workforces; a wave of mental health challenges; interruption of education; and increased risks of violence, abuse, exploitation, and neglect. These challenges notwithstanding, the response to COVID-19 may also provide opportunities, such as for health system strengthening, that could improve child health after the pandemic. Summary The negative impacts of COVID-19 on global child health may be substantial. However, these are not foregone conclusions and much can be done to mitigate the worst outcomes. Child health providers should advocate for an equitable response to COVID-19 that prioritizes the health of vulnerable children and furthers the gains made in global child health.