We have identified six children with a

Fourteen marker chromosomes were studied by FISH (fluorescence in-situ hybridization) in cytogenetic preparations from 13 patients. The derived markers were identified as one isodicentric bisatellited mar(22), one fragment sized r(X), one fragment sized r(Y), one i(18p), small autosomal ring markers in three different patients derived from chromosomes 2, 8, and 8, a marker comprised of 9p and part of 9qh, and 3 bisatellited apparently monocentric markers; one of each from chromosomes 13 or 21, 14 or 22, and 15. Two fragment sized small ring markers in one patient and a small ring marker in another were negative with all twenty-two different probes used. In addition, the small ring marker Y chromosome that was found in a boy with karyotype 46,X,-Y,+mar was negative with both pDXZ1 and pDYZ3. This anomaly of negative results with the battery of centromeric alphoid probes can be explained if one breakpoint for some small ring markers is very near to or within the centromere. Only some of the pericentromeric repetitive sequences in the normal chromosome would be represented in the chromosome specific alphoid probes, and presumably those corresponding to the currently available probes are truncated during the formation of the unidentified markers. In three of the small ring markers the FISH signal on the marker was much stronger than on the normal homologues in various proportions of cells, and this may indicate that some of the fragment sized small rings were multicentric. The literature was reviewed for Distamycin A/DAPI negative small ring markers that were present as extra chromosomes. There were only single published cases of most small rings but there were three r(8) cases, two r(1) cases, two r(12) cases, and two r(20) cases, uncomplicated by the presence of other chromosome abnormalities. Most cases with similar small rings were quite dissimilar phenotypically and syndrome identification was not possible, but in pooled data, 18/23 (about 80%) were developmentally and/or phenotypically abnormal. Some patients (5/23, about 20%) with small rings were dysmorphic without intellectual handicap. Of 28 such patients with small ring markers (Distamycin/Dapi negative) in pooled data there are 6 (about 20%) with multiple markers mostly derived from different chromosomes. This is a very high figure and would suggest that the ring formation events, although involving different chromosomes, must be related and must be an indicator of the mechanism of origin of this group of markers.

Deletion of distal 6p is associated with a distinctive clinical phenotype including Axenfeld-Rieger malformation, hearing loss, congenital heart disease, dental anomalies, developmental delay, and a characteristic facial appearance. We report the case of a child where recognition of the specific ocular and facial phenotype, led to identification of a 6p microdeletion arising from a de novo 6:18 translocation. Detailed analysis confirmed deletion of the FOXC1 forkhead gene cluster at 6p25. CNS anomalies included hydrocephalus and hypoplasia of the cerebellum, brainstem, and corpus callosum with mild to moderate developmental delay. Unlike previous reports, hearing was normal.

Two cases of submicroscopic recombinants of intrachromosomal transposition of telomeres, one each from chromosome 1 and 2 are described. Meiotic crossing-over would generate the recombinants from these reciprocal rearrangements. In both cases, which were detected by FISH with subtelomeric probes, there is a minute deletion of the qter region and a second presence of the pter subtelomeric region on the respective qter, i.e., a duplication of 1pter or 2pter respectively. The deletion on 2qter (case 2) was confirmed by microsatellite inheritance and was of paternal origin, but in case 1 there was no detectable 1q deletion other than of the subtelomeric probe, and parental origin could not be determined. The present case 2 with del(2qter)/dup(2pter) shares many features with reported cases of simple deletion (2qter) but did not have features of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy, which are seen in half of such deletion patients. The clinical features present in case 1 were similar to those of the previously reported case of a submicroscopic 1qter deletion but also to cases with microscopically visible 1qter deletions, presumably because of gene enrichment in subtelomeric regions. Recombinants of such intrachromosomal subtelomere transpositions detected by subtelomeric probes may comprise up to 10% of submicroscopic pter or qter deletion cases. Other cases of this unusual mechanism may be detected with more common use of subtelomeric probes. It is suggested the bouquet associations of telomeres in early meiosis may facilitate such unusual rearrangements.

We report on three male infants with de novo terminal deletions of chromosome 9q34.3. The clinical features are compared to the nine cases described in the literature. Case 1 and 3 were ascertained following the use of subtelomeric FISH to screen for a chromosomal anomaly, case 2 was confirmed by FISH probe following detection of a 9q deletion on standard karyotyping. Deletions in this region result in severe developmental delay, a distinct facial phenotype, cardiac anomalies, obesity, and respiratory failure, which may result in premature death. The delineation of the 9q deletion phenotype will aid diagnosis and genetic counseling as subtelomere FISH screening becomes more widely available.