Background Since 2010, nationwide networks of reference centers for sarcomas (RREPS/NETSARC/RESOS) collected and prospectively reviewed all cases of sarcomas and connective tumors of intermediate malignancy (TIM) in France. Methods The nationwide incidence of sarcoma or TIM (2013–2016) was measured using the 2013 WHO classification and confirmed by a second independent review by expert pathologists. Simple clinical characteristics, yearly variations and correlation of incidence with published clinical trials are presented and analyzed. Results Over 150 different histological subtypes are reported from the 25172 patients with sarcomas (n = 18712, 74,3%) or TIM (n = 6460, 25.7%), with n = 5838, n = 6153, n = 6654, and n = 6527 yearly cases from 2013 to 2016. Over these 4 years, the yearly incidence of sarcomas and TIM was therefore 70.7 and 24.4 respectively, with a combined incidence of 95.1/106/year, higher than previously reported. GIST, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcomas, undifferentiated sarcomas represented 13%, 13%, 11% and 11% of tumors. Only GIST, as a single entity had a yearly incidence above 10/106/year. There were respectively 30, 64 and 66 different histological subtypes of sarcomas or TIM with an incidence ranging from 10 to 1/106, 1–0.1/106, or < 0.1/106/year respectively. The 2 latter incidence groups represented 21% of the patients with 130 histotypes. Published phase III and phase II clinical trials (p<10−6) are significantly higher with sarcomas subtypes with an incidence above 1/106 per. Conclusions This nationwide registry of sarcoma patients, with exhaustive histology review by sarcoma experts, shows that the incidence of sarcoma and TIM is higher than reported, and that tumors with a very low incidence (1<106/year) are less likely to be included in clinical trials.

Distinguishing hemangioblastomas from metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinomas (CCRCCs) in the brain is a diagnostic challenge owing to similar clinical and morphologic presentations. Inhibin-alpha and aquaporin1 were shown as positive markers of hemangioblastoma, but are not totally reliable distinguishing hemangioblastoma from metastatic CCRCC. This study shows that the diagnosis can be achieved using a combination of markers. To identify the panel of markers useful for this differential, 67 hemangioblastomas and 34 metastatic CCRCCs were analyzed using a panel of antibodies including aquaporin1, inhibin-alpha, D2-40, cytokeratin AE1/AE3, epithelial membrane antigen, and CD10. The study confirms the usefulness of aquaporin1 (97% sensitivity, 83% specificity) and inhibin-alpha (88% sensitivity, 79% specificity) as positive markers of hemangioblastoma and shows that aquaporin1 is a superior positive marker versus inhibin-alpha for the differential. Positivity of tumor cells with cytokeratin AE1/AE3 is the signature of a metastatic CCRCC (100% specificity, 88% sensitivity) and CD10 expression as well (100% specificity, 79% sensitivity). The combined use of aquaporin1 and AE1/AE3 yields a high degree of sensitivity and specificity to differentiate between hemangioblastoma and metastatic CCRCC. All tumors but one aquaporin1 positive and cytokeratin AE1/AE3 negative (65/66) correspond to hemangioblastomas (97% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 98.5% diagnostic positive predictive value). Tumors with the opposite profile, aquaporin1 negative, and cytokeratin AE1/AE3 positive, (25/25), correspond to metastatic CCRCC (74% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% diagnostic positive predictive value). In summary, aquaporin1 is the most sensitive positive marker of hemangioblastoma. Despite its moderate specificity, when used in combination with epithelial marker AE1/AE3, it allowed to reliably distinguish hemangioblastoma from metastatic CCRCC.

Pericytic tumors encompass several entities sharing morphologic and immunohistochemical features. A subset of perivascular myoid tumors associated with the SRF-RELA fusion gene was previously described. Herein, we report a series of 13 tumors belonging to this group, in which we have identified new fusion genes by RNA-sequencing, thus expanding the molecular spectrum of this entity. All patients except 1 were children and infants. The tumors, frequently located in the head (n=8), had a mean size of 38 mm (range 10 to 150 mm) and were mostly (n=9) well-circumscribed. Exploration of the follow-up data (ranging from 3 to 68 mo) confirmed the benign behavior of these tumors. These neoplasms presented a spectrum of morphologies, ranging from perivascular patterns to myoid appearance. Tumor cells presented mitotic figures but without marked atypia. Some of these tumors could mimic sarcoma. The immunohistochemical profiles confirmed a pericytic differentiation with the expression of the smooth muscle actin and the h-caldesmon, as well as the frequent positivity for pan-cytokeratin. The molecular analysis identified the expected SRF-RELA fusion gene, in addition to other genetic alterations, all involving SRF fused to CITED1, CITED2, NFKBIE, or NCOA2. The detection of SRF-NCOA2 fusions in spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma of the infant has previously been described, representing a risk of misdiagnosis, although the cases reported herein did not express MyoD1. Finally, clustering analyses confirmed that this group of SRF-fused perivascular myoid tumors forms a distinct entity, different from other perivascular tumors, spindle cell rhabdomyosarcomas of the infant, and smooth muscle tumors.

Background: Since 2010, NETSARC and RREPS collected and reviewed prospectively all cases of sarcomas and tumors of intermediate malignancy (TIM) nationwide. Methods: The nationwide incidence of sarcoma or TIM (2013-2016), confirmed by expert pathologists using WHO classification are presented. Yearly variations and correlation with published clinical trials was analyzed. Results: 139 histological subtypes are reported among the 25172 patients with sarcomas (n=18710, 64%) or TIM (n=6460, 36%), respectively n=5838, n=6153, n=6654, and n=6527 yearly from 2013 to 2016. Over these 4 years, the yearly incidence of sarcomas and TIM was therefore 79.7, 24.9 and 95.1/106/year, above that previously reported. GIST, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcomas, undifferentiated sarcomas represented 13%, 13%, 11% and 11% of tumors. Only GIST, as a single entity had a yearly incidence above 10/million/year. There were respectively 30, 63 and 66 different histological subtypes of sarcomas or TIM with an incidence ranging from 10 to 1/106, 1-0.1/106, or < 0.1/106/year respectively. The 2 later incidence groups included 21% of the patients. The incidence of 8 histotypes varied significantly over this 4 years. Patients with tumors with an incidence above 1/106per year have significantly higher numbers of dedicated published phase III and phase II clinical trials (p<10-6). Conclusions: This nationwide registry of sarcoma patients with histology reviewed by sarcoma experts shows that the incidence of sarcoma and TIM is higher than reported, and that tumors with an incidence<106/year have a much lower access to clinical trials.

No abstract