R esumen Con el objetivo de ampliar el conjunto de materiales de referencia del Laboratorio de Geocronología del Servicio Geológico Colombiano (LG-SGC) se colectaron circones provenientes de la sienita nefelínica de San José del Guaviare, localidad del Jordán (Colombia). La muestra SNG-1 se compuso de 24 circones seleccionados de la fracción situada entre 2 y 5 milímetros de largo, montados y pulidos en un bloque de resina epóxica. La datación se realizó mediante análisis de relaciones isotópicas de uranio y plomo, utilizando el método LA-ICPMS. En el LG-SGC se seleccionaron 92 puntos sobre los circones y en la Universidad de Rennes, en Francia (LG-URF), se analizaron 24 puntos en áreas cercanas de los mismos cristales mediante estudio previo de catodoluminiscencia. Las edades concordantes obtenidas de los circones corresponden, en ambos laboratorios, a la edad de cristalización de 608 ± 1,2 Ma y 602 ± 3 Ma, respectivamente, que difieren en menos del 1 %, pese a la diferencia en instrumentación y las rutinas analíticas. Para corrección de errores sistemáticos y control de calidad se emplearon materiales de referencia internacionales, como circones de Plešovice, GJ-1, FC-5 Duluth y Mount Dromedary. Las incertidumbres producidas durante los

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Abstract. Reconstructing the evolution of foreland basins that experienced late exhumation is challenging due to an incomplete sedimentary record. Thermochronometry has been applied successfully to reconstruct basin evolution, but the method is subject to uncertainties. For the Swiss Molasse Basin, a wide range of exhumation magnitude and timing has been proposed based on thermochronometry. We aim to reduce uncertainty by dating larger numbers of grains and samples, to obtain statistically more robust data. New apatite (U-Th-Sm)/He (AHe) data from a single borehole shows ages of 4 to 30 Ma in the upper 500 meters and ages of 3 to 80 Ma below 1300 meters. This is counterintuitive as a total reset is expected at depths exceeding approximately 600 m. To arrive at a single consistent thermal history including our and previously published data, we conduct thermal modeling with different software. In particular we test the influence of different provenance histories and distinguish between cooling associated with changes in heat flow vs changes in exhumation. We determine 1050 m +/- 100 m of exhumation, starting slowly at 13 Ma and accelerating at 9 Ma. Coinciding with exhumation, heat flow begins to rise sharply, causing heating until 5 Ma, despite ongoing exhumation. We show that this discrepancy between start of exhumation and start of cooling is the main reason for differing estimates for the burial and exhumation history of the basin. We suggest that the remaining misfit between modeled and measured Molasse AHe ages can be explained by post-Miocene hydrothermal flux in the Neogene sediment fill above a sealing layer, potentially the Opalinus Clay or Triassic evaporites. In summary, we show that a single consistent model for basin exhumation relies on large sets of grains and samples, as well as inclusion of provenance ages in the models. With timing of the main exhumation phase constrained to start at 9 Ma, we can rule out a 5 Ma climatic event as exhumation driver. As the region is not affected by extensive faulting, deep seated processes related to mantle dynamics remain as exhumation driving process.