Purpose Approximately 3% to 10% of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) -mutant non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) undergo transformation to small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), but their clinical course is poorly characterized. Methods We retrospectively identified patients with EGFR-mutant SCLC and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas seen at our eight institutions. Demographics, disease features, and outcomes were analyzed. Results We included 67 patients—38 women and 29 men; EGFR mutations included exon 19 deletion (69%), L858R (25%), and other (6%). At the initial lung cancer diagnosis, 58 patients had NSCLC and nine had de novo SCLC or mixed histology. All but these nine patients received one or more EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor before SCLC transformation. Median time to transformation was 17.8 months (95% CI, 14.3 to 26.2 months). After transformation, both platinum-etoposide and taxanes yielded high response rates, but none of 17 patients who received immunotherapy experienced a response. Median overall survival since diagnosis was 31.5 months (95% CI, 24.8 to 41.3 months), whereas median survival since the time of SCLC transformation was 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 13.7 months). Fifty-nine patients had tissue genotyping at first evidence of SCLC. All maintained their founder EGFR mutation, and 15 of 19 with prior EGFR T790M positivity were T790 wild-type at transformation. Other recurrent mutations included TP53, Rb1, and PIK3CA. Re-emergence of NSCLC clones was identified in some cases. CNS metastases were frequent after transformation. Conclusion There is a growing appreciation that EGFR-mutant NSCLCs can undergo SCLC transformation. We demonstrate that this occurs at an average of 17.8 months after diagnosis and cases are often characterized by Rb1, TP53, and PIK3CA mutations. Responses to platinum-etoposide and taxanes are frequent, but checkpoint inhibitors yielded no responses. Additional investigation is needed to better elucidate optimal strategies for this group.
We present a cohort of 41 patients with osimertinib resistance biopsies,
including two with an acquired CCDC6-RET fusion. While
RET fusions have been identified in resistant
EGFR-mutant NSCLC, their role in acquired resistance to
EGFR inhibitors is not well described. To assess the biological implications of
RET fusions in an EGFR-mutant cancer, we
expressed CCDC6-RET in PC9 (EGFR del19) and MGH134
(EGFR L858R/T790M) cells and found that CCDC6-RET was
sufficient to confer resistance to EGFR-TKIs. The selective RET inhibitors
BLU-667 or cabozantinib resensitized CCDC6-RET-expressing cells to EGFR
inhibition. Finally, we treated two patients with EGFR-mutant
NSCLC and RET-mediated resistance with osimertinib and BLU-667.
The combination was well-tolerated and led to rapid radiographic response in
both patients. This study provides proof-of-concept that RET
fusions can mediate acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs and that combined EGFR and
RET inhibition with osimertinib/BLU-667 may be a well-tolerated and effective
treatment strategy for such patients.
Multivariable analysis controlling for these imbalances still showed a benefit of veliparib (HR¼0.26, p¼0.001). Comparison of "in strata" group (N¼46) to the "not in strata" group (N¼82) showed significant imbalance in pleural effusion (p¼0.058); elevated AST (p¼0.0099) and bilirubin (p¼0.0447). Median PFS was identical at 5.9 mos for both groups while median OS was 10.7 mos (95% CI 8.9-13.2) for "not in strata" subsets vs. 8.8 mos (95% CI 7.8-10.8) for "in strata" with a HR of 1.57 (p¼0.027) comparing "in strata" to "not in strata". Outcome differences based on SLFN11 and DNA-PK expression will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: PFS benefit of PARP inhibitor therapy in extensive stage SCLC patients with elevated LDH and male gender was not associated with any other clinical characteristics.
ments in group A. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The 12-months OS rate was 97% in group A and 84% in group B. Conclusion: New generation ALKis maintain their efficacy regardless of the treatment setting considered. The sequential strategy seems to provide a substantial benefit, but a longer follow-up and larger samples are needed to clarify the survival impact.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.