There has been wide variation in the reported haemorrhagic manifestations of factor VII deficiency. We examined type and frequency of clinical manifestations in 28 Iranian and Italian patients with severe deficiency (factor VII coagulant activity 2% or less). The most frequent symptoms were epistaxis and menorrhagia, whereas soft tissue bleeding such as haemarthrosis and muscle haematoma was less frequent. Only 5 of 9 patient who underwent surgery without factor VII replacement therapy had postoperative bleeding severe enough to require blood transfusion. No thrombotic manifestation occurred. A factor VII functional assay based on the use of human thromboplastin was a better predictor of the bleeding tendency of these patients than a rabbit thromboplastin-based functional assay or immunoassay. On the whole, this study shows that in severe factor VII deficiency bleeding in mucosal tracts is not uncommon. Surgery can sometimes be performed without replacement therapy and without haemorrhagic complications.

No abstract

Introduction. The rapid spread of COVID-19 across the globe is forcing surgical oncologists to change their daily practice. We sought to evaluate how breast surgeons are adapting their surgical activity to limit viral spread and spare hospital resources. Methods. A panel of 12 breast surgeons from the most affected regions of the world convened a virtual meeting the 7 th of April 2020 to discuss the changes in their local surgical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Similarly, a web-based poll based was created to evaluate changes in surgical practice among breast surgeons from several countries. Results. The virtual meeting showed that distinct countries and regions were experiencing different phases of the pandemic. Surgical priority was given to patients with aggressive disease not candidate for primary systemic therapy, those with progressive disease under neoadjuvant systemic therapy, and post-neoadjuvant patients. One hundred breast surgeons filled out the poll. The trend showed reductions in operating room schedules, indications for surgery, and consultations, with an increasingly restrictive approach to elective surgery with worsening of the pandemic. Conclusion. The COVID-19 emergency should not compromise treatment of a potentially lethal disease such as breast cancer. Our results reveal that physicians are instinctively reluctant to abandon conventional standards of care when possible. However, as the situation deteriorates, alternative strategies of de-escalation are being adopted. The Oncologist 2020;9999:• •

No abstract

Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.

Primary angiosarcoma (AS) of the breast is a rare neoplasia that is not related to radiation exposure. It represents less than 0.05% of all malignant breast tumors. This lesion is characterized by aggressive patterns and poor prognosis and by the absence of typical features at radiologic examination.Currently there are not evidence-based guidelines regarding surgical and adjuvant treatment for this tumor even though wide surgical resection followed by chemo- radiotherapy appears to improve both disease free survival and overall survival.The aim of this study was to analyze the available series of AS patients suggesting the most reliable treatment options for this rare neoplasia.

Despite the central role of breast reconstruction in women with breast cancer, the best implants to use in reconstructive surgery have been studied rarely in the context of RCTs. Furthermore the quality of these studies and the overall evidence they provide is largely unsatisfactory. Some of our results can be interpreted as early evidence of potentially large differences between different surgical approaches, which should be confirmed in new high-quality RCTs that include a larger number of women. These days - even after a few million women have had breasts reconstructed - surgeons cannot inform women about the risks and complications of different implant-based breast reconstructive options on the basis of results derived from RCTs.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is an uncommon neoplasia occurring in women with either cosmetic or reconstructive breast implants. The actual knowledge about BIA-ALCL deriving from the literature presents several limits, and it remains difficult to make inferences about BIA-ALCL epidemiology, cause, and pathogenesis. This is the reason why the authors decided to organize an evidence-based consensus conference during the Maurizio Bruno Nava (MBN 2016) Aesthetic Breast Meeting held in Milan in December of 2016. Twenty key opinion leaders in the field of plastic surgery from all over the world have been invited to express and discuss their opinion about some key questions on BIA-ALCL, trying to reach a consensus about BIA-ALCL cause, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment in light of the actual best evidence.