No abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of chronic liver disease and associated morbidity and mortality worldwide. Short-course, oral, curative, direct-acting antiviral regimens have now transformed treatment for HCV infection. Since the launch in 2016 of the first global strategy towards elimination of viral hepatitis as a public health threat by 2030, the predominant focus of the global response has been on treatment of adults, who bear the greatest burden of morbidity and mortality of HCV related chronic liver disease. There has been much less attention paid to addressing response to HCV in children and adolescents, in part because of the lack of data to inform specific paediatric management practices and policy. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on epidemiology, natural history, and treatment of chronic HCV infection in adolescents and children, and highlight key differences from infection acquired in adulthood. The estimated global prevalence and burden in children aged 1 to 19 years is 0•15% and 3•5 (3•1-3•9) million, respectively. HCV infection is usually asymptomatic during childhood, and cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma are rare. Sofosbuvir, ledipasvir and ribavirin have now received regulatory approval and guidelines recommend their use in adolescents ages >12 years with HCV infection. Key actions to address the current policy gaps and achieve treatment scale-up comparable to that in adults include: establishment of a testing and treatment access campaign targeted at children and adolescents; fast-track evaluation of pangenotypic regimens and accelerated approval of paediatric formulations. Research gaps that need to be addressed include age-specific seroprevalence studies of HCV viraemia in priority countries; further validation of non-invasive tests in children; and establishment of paediatric treatment registries and international consortia to promote collaborative research agenda.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major cause of acute and chronic liver disease and associated morbidity and mortality worldwide. Vertical and early childhood transmission are the main routes of HBV transmission globally, responsible for most chronic infectionsincluding in adults who bear the greatest burden of morbidity and mortality. Universal infant and birth dose hepatitis B immunization is the key preventative strategy for global elimination of HBV infection, and has been highly effective in reducing new vertical infections. Global progress on HBV testing and treatment, however, has been slow in adults and children. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on epidemiology, natural history, and treatment of chronic HBV infection in adolescents and children, highlighting key differences from the experience with adults, and conclude with key actions to address current policy gaps. The estimated global prevalence in children aged 5 years or less is 1.3%. Most children are in the "high replication, low level of inflammation" infection phase with normal or only minimally raised aminotransferases; cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma are rare. Although entecavir is approved and recommended for children 2 to <18 years, and tenofovir for those 12 to < 18 years, a conservative approach to treatment initiation is currently recommended. Key actions to address current policy gaps include: validation of non-invasive tests for liver disease staging; additional immunopathogenesis studies in HBV infected children, and long-term follow-up of children on nucleoside analogue regimens to inform guidance on when to start treatment; evaluation of different treatment strategies for children with high levels of replication; and establishment of paediatric treatment registries and international consortia to promote collaborative research.

World Health Organization and US Fulbright Program.

Hepatitis C is the most common blood borne virus in Australia affecting over 200 000 people. Effective treatment for hepatitis C has only become accessible in Australia since the late 1990's, although active injecting drug use (IDU) remained an exclusion criteria for government-funded treatment until 2001. Treatment uptake has been slow, particularly among injecting drug users, the largest affected group. We developed a peer-based integrated model of hepatitis C care at a community drug and alcohol clinic. Clients interested and eligible for hepatitis C treatment had their substance use, mental health and other psychosocial comorbidities co-managed onsite at the clinic prior to and during treatment. In a qualitative preliminary evaluation of the project, nine current patients of the clinic were interviewed, as was the clinic peer worker. A high level of patient acceptability of the peer-based model and an endorsement the integrated model of care was found. This paper describes the acceptability of a peer-based integrated model of hepatitis C care by the clients using the service.

No abstract

BackgroundThere have been few reports on programmatic experience of viral hepatitis testing and treatment in resource-limited settings. To inform the development of the 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) viral hepatitis testing guidance and in particular the feasibility of proposed recommendations, we undertook a survey across a range of organisations engaged with hepatitis testing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Our objective was to describe current hepatitis B and C testing practices across a range of settings in different countries, as well as key barriers or challenges encountered and proposed solutions to promote testing scale-up.MethodsHepatitis testing programmes in predominantly LMICs were identified from the WHO Global Hepatitis Programme contacts database and through WHO regional offices, and invited to participate. The survey comprised a six-part structured questionnaire: general programme information, description of hepatitis testing, treatment and care services, budget and funding, data on programme outcomes, and perceptions on key barriers encountered and strategies to address these.ResultsWe interviewed 22 viral hepatitis testing programmes from 19 different countries. Nine were from the African region; 6 from the Western Pacific; 4 from South-East Asia; and 3 from Eastern Europe. All but four of the programmes were based in LMICs, and 10 (45.5%) were supported by non-governmental or international organizations. All but two programmes undertook targeted testing of specific affected populations such as people living with HIV, people who inject drugs, sex workers, health care workers, and pregnant women. Only two programmes focussed on routine testing in the general population. The majority of programmes were testing in hospital-based or other health facilities, particularly HIV clinics, and community-based testing was limited. Nucleic acid testing (NAT) for confirmation of HCV and HBV viraemia was available in only 30% and 18% of programmes, respectively. Around a third of programmes required some patient co-payment for diagnosis. The most commonly identified challenges in scale-up of hepatitis testing were: limited community awareness about viral hepatitis; lack of facilities or services for hepatitis testing; no access to low cost treatment, particularly for HCV; absence of national guidance and policies; no dedicated budget for hepatitis; and lack of trained health care and laboratory workers.ConclusionsAt this early stage in the global scale-up of testing for viral hepatitis, there is a wide variation in testing practices and approaches across different programmes. There remains limited access to NAT to confirm viraemia, and patient self-payment for testing and treatment is common. There was consensus from implementing organizations that scale-up of testing will require increased community awareness, health care worker training, development of national strategies and guidelines, and improved access to low cost NAT virological testing.Electronic supplementary materialThe online ver...

No abstract