Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society they cannot afford to compromise market-oriented skills by refocusing education on children's social, emotional and aesthetic development. These views reflect Bernstein's description of our society as being over-pedagogized, with the main purpose of lifelong learning being to train and retrain the workforce to become responsive to a rapidly changing job market.This book is an ambitious project, in that it attempts to bring together the debates on reading, targeting phonics in particular and explore the wider context of neoliberal ideologies regarding educational policy and the use of science to inform classroom practice in America. As I read this book, I kept questioning what the main issue was. If Strauss is to use phonics as a vehicle to discuss the political, ideological and social context of education in American state schools, then he should have discussed in more detail the processes whereby neoliberal ideologies shape literacy policy and the obstacles to the development of democratic practices and participation in American schools, and extend his discussion on academic imperialism. However, if the main focus was whether phonics or whole-language approaches are effective methods to teach reading and how phonological development relates to reading, then a detailed discussion of the vast research body that covers these instructional methods and their theoretical underpinnings would have been useful.Strauss, being a linguist himself, discusses in detail the empirical research on the letter-sound system of the English language. Specifically, he provides a detailed analysis of the phonetic rules and the logical organization of the letter-sound system, questioning the assumption that we need to know how this system works in order to learn how to read. I think this is an important issue which goes to the heart of the reading debates, and to address it there is a need to explore how research on the letter-sound system interfaces with research on reading. There is also another body of research that is not discussed here, which examines the effectiveness of phonics in the development of reading, especially for children with dyslexia and other learning difficulties. This is an important body of research especially when Strauss states that around 45% of illiterate children display learning difficulties and sensory impairment. Also, research evidence on the effectiveness of the whole-language approach is missing.However, if the main focus of the book is on the impact of marginalization, poverty and inequality on literacy, the state-endorsed ideologies that shape education and the future of corporate America, then the discussion on literacy, the nature and purpose of education and what a future knowledge-based society requires is somewhat limited. De Sousa Santos in his New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition (1995) observes that the 'future is no longer what it used to be', suggest...
PurposeThis paper is based on a research project sponsored by the DTI, with contributions from construction industry partners. The principal objective of the research was to generate data (based on a sample of new‐build housing schemes) about the levels of compliance with Building Regulations and standards typically achieved in England and Wales.Design /methodology/approachThe field research consisted of a triangulation of three research methods. A series of observations of 11 speculative housing projects (in Oxfordshire and Gloucestershire) during construction. A questionnaire survey of occupants of recently completed speculatively built houses. A total of 200 questionnaires were distributed in eight housing developments completed 9‐15 months previously. Semi‐structured interviews with six building control inspectors, both local authority and approved inspectors.FindingsThe general conclusions are that levels of compliance were not always sufficient, though there was no evidence of systematic and purposeful non‐compliance with building regulations. Faults were largely due to lack of skills and knowledge of the required standards on the part of the operatives, and shortcomings in site management and toleration of sub‐standard workmanship.Research limitations/implicationsThe surveys were limited to projects by national or regional scale housing developers on mainly medium‐large size house developments that included semi‐detached, detached and townhouses.Practical implicationsThe recommendations point to the need for more initial and continuing training of tradesmen, both in trade skills and knowledge of the provisions of building regulations, and more rigorous site management procedures adopted, particularly when pressure for completion is at its greatest.Originality/valueThe value of the paper is linked to the originality of the research; prior to it, reliable evidence of the scale and extent of non‐compliance with Building Regulations in the UK was not recorded in any publicly available source.
This paper reports on work developed under the EC FP7 project FloodProBE "Technologies for the costeffective protection of the built environment". Across and outside Europe, urban flood resilience guidelines acknowledge the benefits of resilient building materials as a way to limit damage and speed up recovery from floods; however most existing classification systems are only qualitative and not transparent. This stems from the very limited data on performance, the inappropriate standard testing of materials with regard to flood exposure and the absence of approved testing protocols at European level. Regulation and practices on building resilience in a range of countries are discussed and outline cost benefit analysis is presented focusing on urban critical infrastructure buildings. A roadmap for overcoming technical barriers to the improved acceptance and implementation of building flood resilience is delineated, including suggestions for new European Norms on flood resilient buildings and materials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.