The aim of the study was to examine whether cognitive skills are related to persistence. Thus, children's (N = 157, mean age: 5.9 years) persistent and non-persistent behaviours (i.e., cheating and off-task) were assessed in an unsolvable task. Additionally, we assessed children's executive functions and temperament. Analysis for persistence showed that cognitive inhibition and cognitive flexibility predicted children's persistent behaviour, beyond age and temperament. Analyses for non-persistent behaviours revealed that temperament and weak executive functions predicted cheating, while age predicted off-task behaviour.
Statement of contributionWhat is already known on this subject?So far, persistence has been conceptualized as a temperamental sub-dimension of self-regulation.
What does this study add?A child's persistence depends not only on temperament but also on cognitive inhibition and cognitive flexibility.There are qualitative differences between the two non-persistent behaviours cheating and off-task. While cheating is related to weaker cognitive skills, off-task behaviour seems mainly age-related.Some children persist in the face of a challenge, others do not. Why this might be is largely unknown. The aim of the present study was to approach this question by (1) examining factors possibly related to persistence and (2) examining non-persistent behaviours in relation to persistence. So far, persistence has been conceptualized as a temperamentally based sub-dimension of self-regulation (Rothbart, Ahadi, Hershey, & Fisher, 2001). Although separate lines of evidence favour the hypothesis that also cognitive skills could be related to persistence (see, e.g., Barkley, 1997;Cuevas & Bell, 2014;Zelazo, 2015), no study has systematically analysed whether executive functions (EFs), that is, inhibition, shifting, and working memory (Miyake et al., 2000), were related to persistence. Without questioning the temperamental aspect of persistence, we aimed to examine a possible relation between EF and persistence.