Background Little is known about the natural history of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or its contribution to infection transmission. Methods We conducted a prospective study at a quarantine center for COVID-19 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. We enrolled quarantined people with RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, collecting clinical data, travel and contact history, and saliva at enrolment and daily nasopharyngeal throat swabs (NTS) for RT-PCR testing. We compared the natural history and transmission potential of asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Results Between March 10th and April 4th, 2020, 14,000 quarantined people were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 49 were positive. Of these, 30 participated in the study: 13(43%) never had symptoms and 17(57%) were symptomatic. 17(57%) participants acquired their infection outside Vietnam. Compared with symptomatic individuals, asymptomatic people were less likely to have detectable SARS-CoV-2 in NTS samples collected at enrolment (8/13 (62%) vs. 17/17 (100%) P=0.02). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 20/27 (74%) available saliva; 7/11 (64%) in the asymptomatic and 13/16 (81%) in the symptomatic group (P=0.56). Analysis of the probability of RT-PCR positivity showed asymptomatic participants had faster viral clearance than symptomatic participants (P<0.001 for difference over first 19 days). This difference was most pronounced during the first week of follow-up. Two of the asymptomatic individuals appeared to transmit the infection to up to four contacts. Conclusions Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and can be detected by analysis of saliva or NTS. NTS viral loads fall faster in asymptomatic individuals, but they appear able to transmit the virus to others.

248 2 1 Main text: 2788 2 2 Running title: Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection 2 3 ABSTRACT 2 5 Background 2 6Little is known about the natural history of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or its 2 7 contribution to infection transmission. 2 8 Methods 2 9We conducted a prospective study at a quarantine centre for COVID-19 in Ho Chi Minh City, 3 0 Vietnam. We enrolled quarantined people with RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 3 1 collecting clinical data, travel and contact history, and saliva at enrolment and daily 3 2 nasopharyngeal throat swabs (NTS) for RT-PCR testing. We compared the natural history and 3 3 transmission potential of asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals.3 4 Results 3 5Between March 10 th and April 4 th , 2020, 14,000 quarantined people were tested for SARS-3 6CoV-2; 49 were positive. Of these, 30 participated in the study: 13(43%) never had symptoms 3 7 and 17(57%) were symptomatic. 17(57%) participants acquired their infection outside Vietnam. 3 8 Compared with symptomatic individuals, asymptomatic people were less likely to have 3 9 detectable SARS-CoV-2 in NTS samples collected at enrolment (8/13 (62%) vs. 17/17 (100%) 4 0 P=0.02). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 20/27 (74%) available saliva; 7/11 (64%) in the 4 1 asymptomatic and 13/16 (81%) in the symptomatic group (P=0.56). Analysis of the probability 4 2 of RT-PCR positivity showed asymptomatic participants had faster viral clearance than 4 3 symptomatic participants (P<0.001 for difference over first 19 days). This difference was most 4 4 pronounced during the first week of follow-up. Two of the asymptomatic individuals appeared 4 5 to transmit the infection to up to four contacts. 4 6 Conclusions 4 7 Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and can be detected by analysis of saliva or 4 8 NTS. NTS viral loads fall faster in asymptomatic individuals, but they appear able to transmit 4 9 the virus to others. 5 0 Hospitals, located approximately 60 km to the West and East, respectively, of HCMC (Figure 9 7 2A).

We report a superspreading event of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection initiated at a bar in Vietnam with evidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic transmission, based on ministry of health reports, patient interviews, and whole-genome sequence analysis. Crowds in enclosed indoor settings with poor ventilation may be considered at high risk for transmission.

HPIVs are serologically and genetically grouped into four species that account for up to 10% of all hospitalizations due to acute respiratory infection in children under the age of five. Genetic and epidemiological data for the four HPIVs derived from two pediatric cohorts in Viet Nam are presented. Respiratory samples were screened for HPIV1–4 by real-time PCR. Demographic and clinical data of patients infected with different HPIV were compared. We used a hemi-nested PCR approach to generate viral genome sequences from HPIV-positive samples and conducted a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis. In total, 170 samples tested positive for HPIV. HPIV3 was most commonly detected in our cohort and 80 co-detections of HPIV with other respiratory viruses were found. Phylogenetic analyses suggest local endemic circulation as well as punctuated introductions of new HPIV lineages. Viral gene flow analysis revealed that Viet Nam is a net importer of viral genetic diversity. Epidemiological analyses imply similar disease severity for all HPIV species. HPIV sequences from Viet Nam formed local clusters and were interspersed with sequences from diverse geographic regions. Combined, this new knowledge will help to investigate global HPIV circulation patterns in more detail and ultimately define more suitable vaccine strains.