Dendritic cells (DCs) comprise a heterogeneous population of cells that play a key role in initiating, directing and regulating adaptive immune responses, including those critically involved in tumor immunosurveillance. As a riposte to the central role of DCs in the generation of antitumor immune responses, tumors have developed various mechanisms which impair the immunostimulatory functions of DCs or even instruct them to actively contribute to tumor growth and progression. In the first part of this review we discuss general aspects of DC biology, including their origin, subtypes, immature and mature states, and functional plasticity which ensures a delicate balance between active immune response and immune tolerance. In the second part of the review we discuss the complex interactions between DCs and the tumor microenvironment, and point out the challenges faced by DCs during the recognition of tumor Ags. We also discuss the role of DCs in tumor angiogenesis and vasculogenesis.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent professional antigen-presenting cells, capable of initiating proper adaptive immune responses. Although tumor-infiltrating DCs are able to recognize cancer cells and uptake tumor antigens, they often have impaired functions because of the immunosuppressive tumor milieu. Therefore, DCs are targeted by therapeutic means either in vivo or ex vivo to facilitate tumor antigen presentation to T cells and induce or promote efficient antitumor immune responses in cancer patients. This immunotherapeutical approach is defined as specific active tumor immunotherapy or therapeutic cancer vaccination. In this review we briefly discuss general aspects of DC biology, followed by a thorough description of the current knowledge and optimization trends of DC vaccine production ex vivo, including various approaches for the induction of proper DC maturation and efficient loading with tumor antigens. We also discuss critical clinical aspects of DC vaccine application in cancer patients, including protocols of administration (routes and regimens), individualization of tumor immunotherapy, prediction and proper evaluation of immune and clinical responses to immunotherapy, and the critical role of combining tumor immunotherapy with other cancer treatment strategies to achieve maximal therapeutic effects.

No abstract

No abstract

The management of advanced ovarian cancer is challenging due to the high frequency of recurrence, often associated with the development of resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Molecular analyses revealed the complexity of ovarian cancer with particular emphasis on the immune system, which may contribute to disease progression and response to treatment. Cytokines and chemokines mediate the cross-talk between cancer and immune cells, and therefore, present as potential biomarkers, reflecting the tumor microenvironment. A panel of circulating C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL) and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL) chemokines were examined in the serum of 40 high-grade patients with ovarian cancer prior to primary surgery. The level of immune infiltration in tumors was also analyzed. The preoperative levels of chemokines differ between patients. Elevated levels of circulating CXCL4 + CCL20 + CXCL1 combination can discriminate patients with shorter recurrence-free survival and overall survival. The presence of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes was detected in half of the patients. The mRNA expression analysis suggests the presence of antitumoral and immunosuppressive elements in the tumor microenvironment. The combination of circulating CXCL9 + CXCL10 can distinguish immune-infiltrated tumors that will lead to shorter recurrence-free survival. The results suggest that preoperative profiling of circulating chemokines in patients with ovarian cancer may provide valuable information regarding tumor recurrence and immune infiltration. The findings demonstrate that combinations have better prognostic utility than single chemokines, and may serve as patient stratification tools.

Our results provide the evidence for bidirectional interplay between cancer cells and macrophages. Independent of platinum resistance status, ovarian cancer cells polarize macrophages toward M2-like type, whereas macrophages induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stemness-related gene expression profile in cisplatin-sensitive, but not cisplatin-resistant cancer cells.

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is known to exhibit a wide spectrum of aggressiveness and relatively high immunogenicity. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of tumor excision on immunophenotype rearrangements in peripheral blood and to elucidate if it is associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) in high risk (HR) and low risk (LR) patients. Methods: Radical prostatectomy (RP) was performed on 108 PCa stage pT2–pT3 patients. Preoperative vs. postoperative (one and three months) immunophenotype profile (T- and B-cell subsets, MDSC, NK, and T reg populations) was compared in peripheral blood of LR and HR groups. Results: The BCR-free survival difference was significant between the HR and LR groups. Postoperative PSA decay rate, defined as ePSA, was significantly slower in the HR group and predicted BCR at cut-off level ePSA = −2.0% d−1 (AUC = 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78–0.90). Three months following tumor excision, the LR group exhibited a recovery of natural killer CD3 − CD16+ CD56+ cells, from 232 cells/µL to 317 cells/µL (p < 0.05), which was not detectable in the HR group. Prostatectomy also resulted in an increased CD8+ population in the LR group, mostly due to CD8+ CD69+ compartment (from 186 cells/µL before surgery to 196 cells/µL three months after, p < 001). The CD8+ CD69+ subset increase without total T cell increase was present in the HR group (p < 0.001). Tumor excision resulted in a myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) number increase from 12.4 cells/µL to 16.2 cells/µL in the HR group, and no change was detectable in LR patients (p = 0.12). An immune signature of postoperative recovery was more likely to occur in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Open RP (ORP) was associated with increased MDSC numbers (p = 0.002), whereas LRP was characterized by an immunity sparing profile, with no change in MDSC subset (p = 0.16). Conclusion: Tumor excision in prostate cancer patients results in two distinct patterns of immunophenotype rearrangement. The low-risk group is highly responsive, revealing postoperative restoration of T cells, NK cells, and CD8+ CD69+ numbers and the absence of suppressor MDSC increase. The high-risk group presented a limited response, accompanied by a suppressor MDSC increase and CD8+ CD69+ increase. The laparoscopic approach, unlike ORP, did not result in an MDSC increase in the postoperative period.

Abstract. Immunotherapy in the form of anticancer vaccination relies on the mobilization of the patient's immune system against specific cancer antigens. Instead of focusing on an autologous cell lysate, which is not always available in clinical practice, the present study investigates vaccines utilizing xenogeneic foetal tissue that are rich in oncofoetal antigens. Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC)-challenged C57BL/6 mice were treated with either a xenogeneic vaccine made from chicken whole embryo, or a xenogeneic vaccine made from rat embryonic brain tissue, supplemented with a Bacillus subtilis protein fraction as an adjuvant. Median and overall survival, size of metastatic foci in lung tissue and levels of circulating CD8a + T cells were evaluated and compared with untreated control mice. Following primary tumour removal, a course of three subcutaneous vaccinations with xenogeneic chicken embryo vaccine led to significant increase in overall survival rate (100% after 70 days of follow-up vs. 40% in untreated control mice), significant increase in circulating CD8a + T cells (18.18 vs. 12.6% in untreated control mice), and a significant decrease in the area and incidence of metastasis foci. The xenogeneic rat brain tissue-based vaccine did not improve any of the investigated parameters, despite promising reports in other models. We hypothesize that the proper selection of antigen source (tissue) can constitute an effective immunotherapeutic product.