Submicroscopic chromosomal anomalies play an important role in the aetiology of intellectual disability (ID) and have been shown to account for up to 10% of non-syndromic forms. We present a family with two affected boys compatible with X-linked inheritance of a phenotype of severe neurodevelopmental disorder co-segregating with a deletion in Xp22.11 exclusively containing the PTCHD1 gene. Although the exact function of this gene is unknown to date, the structural overlap of its encoded patched domain-containing protein 1, the transmembrane protein involved in the sonic hedgehog pathway, and its expression in human cortex and cerebellum as well as in mice and drosophila brain suggests a causative role of its nullisomy in the developmental phenotype of our family. Our findings support the recent notions that PTCHD1 may play a role in X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) and autism disorders.

Interstitial deletions of 1q4 are rare and present with different deletion breakpoints and variable phenotype. We report on the clinical and molecular cytogenetic findings in a girl with minor anomalies, midline defects including prenatally ascertained agenesis of the corpus callosum, epilepsy and developmental delay. A de novo 5.45 Mb deletion almost exclusively located within 1q42 was found to cause this phenotype, which shows significant overlap with the microdeletion 1q41q42 syndrome reported in a few patients except for the agenesis of the corpus callosum. However, deletions in patients with the 1q41q42 syndrome mainly extend into the 1q41 region with a region of overlap including the DISP1 gene involved in the SHH pathway, which is not part of the 1q42 deletion in our patient. We suggest that an interaction of genes involved in pathways of embryonic development rather than haploinsufficiency of single genes in the so-called critical regions is causing complex malformation syndromes due to cytogenetic microaberrations in the 1q4 region.

We report a 26-year-old female patient who was diagnosed within 4 years with chest sarcoma, lung adenocarcinoma, and breast cancer. While her family history was unremarkable, DNA sequencing of TP53 revealed a germline de novo non-sense mutation in exon 6 p.Arg213X. One year later, she further developed a contralateral ductal carcinoma in situ, and 18 months later a jaw osteosarcoma. This case illustrates the therapeutic pitfalls in the care of a young cancer patient with TP53 de novo germline mutations and the complications related to her first-line therapy. Suggestion is made to use the less stringent Chompret criteria for germline TP53 mutation screening. Our observation underlines the possibly negative effect of radiotherapy in generating second tumors in patients with a TP53 mutation. We also present a review of six previously reported cases, comparing their cancer phenotypes with those generally produced by TP53 mutations.

We report on the clinical and cytogenetic findings as well as the array-based characterization of an interstitial familial 13q21 deletion initially recognized by standard karyotyping. Although 13q deletions are known to imply a wide variability of clinical consequences, the deletion carriers of the familial deletion in three generations did not reveal a relevant phenotype. The breakpoints and the deletion size in all three carrier individuals were determined by molecular karyotyping confirming a large 14.5 Mb deletion encompassing the 13q21.1-13q21.33 region identical in all three carriers. Gene paucity and the lack of dosage-sensitive genes in the delineated region might explain the apparently innocuous nature of this chromosomal anomaly. The example of this family presents evidence for describing the chromosomal region 13q21.1-13q21.33 as a large euchromatic variant or benign copy number variation without phenotypic consequences. Our data underline the importance of a phenogenetic approach combining clinical and laboratory evidence in the interpretation of segmental chromosomal anomalies especially in genetic counseling related to prenatal diagnosis.