Background: An in-depth, small scale narrative inquiry into ex-clients' experiences of counselling was undertaken, using a local community counselling agency which highlighted several important themes, including reviews and endings. Aim: To show clients' lived experience of reviews and endings. Methods: Narrative case study methods were used, alongside researcher reflexivity. The meanings were co-constructed between the ex-clients, their counsellors and the researchers. Results: Clients stories show the inter-relationship between reviews and endings, and that even when experienced negatively, clients can see the value of reviews. This paper also notes the therapeutic importance of mutuality and negotiation in decision making about endings. Conclusions: The process of undertaking collaborative, narrative inquiry can be empowering for all involved. Clients, counsellors and managers can question funders about their assumptions about the number of sessions offered when they inform themselves with research.
This article describes a process of moving in and out of a place of “ordinary, transient and sustainable community” within a collaborative writing group. The group meets together both on- and offline. Over the last 5 years, the authors have developed an every day, meandering, and nomadic practice of being, talking, and writing. This enables frequent encounters with a very precious, precarious, and particular sense of collective energy. The group came to describe this experience of moving beyond, in, out of, and through their individual and collective selves as “Gerald.” This article comprises a narrating text in which quotations from the authors’ writing archives are embedded.
Taking Laurel Richardson's concept of a ‘take three words’ workshop onto the social media site Twitter with its discipline of quick 140 character answers to the question ‘What are you doing now?’ proved to be a surprisingly intimate insight into the everyday sociology of the lives of 12 writers living in 21st century Britain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.