No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The accessory optic system of Rana pipiens was investigated by autoradiographic, horseradish peroxidase, and Golgi techniques, revealing a complexity of neuroanatomical organization previously unrecognized. Retinal afferents project to the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) via a primary bundle and more diffuse, medial bundle of optic axons, both of which contain large- and small-diameter fibers. At least six types of retinal ganglion cell contribute to the basal optic root (BOR), including giant ganglion cells, two intermediate-sized ganglion cell types, small ganglion cells, and two types of displaced ganglion cell. The major retinal projection is contralateral, but a small, ipsilateral component also exists. Afferents from neurons which are postsynaptic to the thalamic retinal terminal fields also reach nBOR. Four distinct cell types were identified within the terminal field of nBOR: stellate neurons (63%), amacrine cells (19%), elongate neurons (14%), and large ganglionic neurons (4%). Both stellate and amacrine cells appear to be intrinsic neurons, while elongate and ganglionic neurons constitute the efferent neuron population of nBOR. In addition, cells which lie medial to the terminal field, pyriform and commissural neurons, send dendrites into nBOR. Pyriform neurons project to the nucleus of the medial longitudinal fasciculus (nMLF) and cranial nerve nuclei III and IV, while commissural neurons project to the contralateral nBOR. Large reticular neurons of the nMLF also send dendrites into nBOR. Efferent projections from nBOR were observed in the large-celled pretectal nucleus and in nucleus lateralis profundus. A second major projection originates from the peri-nBOR region and is associated with the oculomotor system and with the nMLF. Efferent projections from the nMLF to the vestibular nuclei and to the rostral spinal cord were also observed, as well as projections which reach the brainstem from the large-celled pretectal nucleus, the posterior thalamic and anterior mesencephalic central gray.

Background:The aim of screening is to detect a cancer in the preclinical state. However, a false-positive or a false-negative test result is a real possibility.Methods:We describe invasive breast cancer progression in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study and construct progression models with and without covariates. The effect of risk factors on transition intensities and false-negative probability is investigated. We estimate the transition rates, the sojourn time and sensitivity of diagnostic tests for women aged 40–49 and 50–59.Results:Although younger women have a slower transition rate from healthy state to preclinical, their screen-detected tumour becomes evident sooner. Women aged 50–59 have a higher mortality rate compared with younger women. The mean sojourn times for women aged 40–49 and 50–59 are 2.5 years (95% CI: 1.7, 3.8) and 3.0 years (95% CI: 2.1, 4.3), respectively. Sensitivity of diagnostic procedures for older women is estimated to be 0.75 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.88), while women aged 40–49 have a lower sensitivity (0.61, 95% CI: 0.42, 0.77). Age is the only factor that affects the false-negative probability. For women aged 40–49, ‘age at entry', ‘history of breast disease' and ‘families with breast cancer' are found to be significant for some of the transition rates. For the age-group 50–59, ‘age at entry', ‘history of breast disease', ‘menstruation length' and ‘number of live births' are found to affect the transition rates.Conclusion:Modelling and estimating the parameters of cancer progression are essential steps towards evaluating the effectiveness of screening policies. The parameters include the transition rates, the preclinical sojourn time, the sensitivity, and the effect of different risk factors on cancer progression.