Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a treatment procedure for some neuropsychiatric disorders, and has been used for brain mapping, as well as diagnosis and treatment of neuromuscular dysfunctions. There is a disconnect between TMS modeling and clinical data: several groups have reported the simulated induced electric field and measured resting motor threshold (RMT) with inconsistent results in the relationship between RMT and brain scalp distance. This necessitates the use of simulation parameters that further account for individual differences in neuroanatomy. We recruited 10 healthy subjects and obtained empirical RMT, magnetic resonance images (MRI), and diffusion tensor images (DTI). We developed anatomically accurate brain models from MRI and simulated TMS to determine the percent depolarized volume of grey matter (DVG) from TMS induced electric fields. Corticospinal fiber tracts were extracted from the primary motor cortex from DTI to obtain fiber tract surface areas for each participant. Linear mixed effects models were used to evaluate the effect of DVG and fiber tract surface area on RMT. We report that DVG correlates with RMT when accounting for corticospinal fiber tract surface area.
Individual neuroanatomy can influence motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and corticomotor excitability after intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between individual neuroanatomy and both TMS response measured using resting motor threshold (RMT) and iTBS measured using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) targeting the biceps brachii and first dorsal interosseus (FDI). Ten nonimpaired individuals completed sham‐controlled iTBS sessions and underwent MRI, from which anatomically accurate head models were generated. Neuroanatomical parameters established through fiber tractography were fiber tract surface area (FTSA), tract fiber count (TFC), and brain scalp distance (BSD) at the point of stimulation. Cortical magnetic field induced electric field strength (EFS) was obtained using finite element simulations. A linear mixed effects model was used to assess effects of these parameters on RMT and iTBS (post‐iTBS MEPs). FDI RMT was dependent on interactions between EFS and both FTSA and TFC. Biceps RMT was dependent on interactions between EFS and and both FTSA and BSD. There was no groupwide effect of iTBS on the FDI but individual changes in corticomotor excitability scaled with RMT, EFS, BSD, and FTSA. iTBS targeting the biceps was facilitatory, and dependent on FTSA and TFC. MRI‐based measures of neuroanatomy highlight how individual anatomy affects motor system responses to different TMS paradigms and may be useful for selecting appropriate motor targets when designing TMS based therapies.
Background Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that can increase corticomotor excitability of hand muscles in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). The objective of this study was to determine the effect of iTBS on the corticomotor excitability of the biceps brachii in individuals with tetraplegia. Methods Ten individuals with low cervical SCI (C5-C8) and ten nonimpaired individuals completed three independent sessions. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) served as our measure of corticomotor excitability and were collected before and after iTBS. MEPs were normalized by the electromyography corresponding to maximum voluntary contraction and analyzed using linear mixed effects models to determine the effect of iTBS (active or sham) on normalized MEPs (nMEPs). iTBS effects were compared to a ratio of active and resting motor thresholds as a measurement of corticomotor conductance potential. Results Relative to sham, active iTBS increased nMEPs over time (p < 0.001) in individuals with SCI, but not nonimpaired individuals (p = 0.915). The amplitude of nMEPs were correlated with the biceps corticomotor conductance potential (p < 0.001), with nMEPs decreasing as the ratio increased at different rates after sham or active iTBS. Conclusions Preliminary results suggest that iTBS increases biceps corticomotor excitability in individuals with tetraplegia with effects that may be predicted by corticomotor conductance potential. Clinical trial registration NCT03277521 Registered on clinicaltrials.gov on August 24, 2017
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive treatment protocol for treating several psychiatric conditions, including depression, migraine, smoking cessation, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Past research suggests that TMS treatment outcomes vary based on neuroanatomy, functional connectivity, and tractography-based structural connectivity. In a previous study, 26 mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients underwent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and showed improvements in depression, post-concussive symptoms, and sleep dysfunction. The present study was a secondary analysis of that data. Anatomically accurate head models were derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and finite element analysis simulations were performed to mimic empirical data collection. This allowed for examination of the roles that age, brain scalp distance (BSD), gray matter volume (GMV), site-specific electrical field strength (EFS), and depolarized gray matter volume (DGMV) had on resting motor threshold (RMT) at the precentral gyrus (PreCG). We also investigated how EFS simulated at the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and RMT influenced rTMS treatment outcomes. Linear regression showed BSD was associated with EFS, RMT, and DGMV supporting efforts to derive accurate parameters from MRI-based modeling. Furthermore, linear mixed effects modeling showed RMT was associated with EFS and DGMV at the PreCG when age and individual neuroanatomy was accounted for suggesting MRI based anatomy and simulated EFS potentially determine TMS dosage. We did not observe any significant relationship between any of the measures from this study on empirically collected rTMS outcomes in mTBI suggesting further investigations into the mechanisms behind these outcomes are needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.