AimsTo examine links between Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) categories and diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) in this population; it is predicted that there will be a positive association between number of ACEs and ASPD. The effectiveness of high secure hospital admission and treatment in reducing number of risk incidents was also examined. ACEs are known to impact significantly on the development of the personality and future psychiatric risk. Currently, research into links between distinct ACE categories and the diagnosis of ASPD in the high-secure inpatient population is limited.MethodsData were collected from a sample (n = 221) including all patients in the Mental Health, Personality Disorder and Women's Services at a high-secure hospital. Records were examined for evidence of abuse/neglect during childhood, and a number of markers of household dysfunction. The statistical relationship between each ACE category and subsequent diagnosis of ASPD was examined through paired t-tests. Frequency of incident reports (IR1s) involving violence was compared in the first, third and fifth years post-admission.ResultsSignificant associations with adult diagnosis of ASPD were seen in categories of childhood physical abuse, sexual abuse, divorced/separated parents, Looked After Child (LAC) status and parental substance misuse, and total number of ACE categories present overall. Significant reductions in frequency of IR1s were seen in all services between first- and fifth- year post admission.ConclusionA significant association between ACEs in specific domains and ASPD in adulthood was found. The importance of detailed exploration of childhood circumstances in this group is highlighted, as well as the need for further investigation of the psychological and social mechanisms underlying.
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author (AC), The data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions e.g., their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.
AimsThere is a developing body of research that suggests that there may be distinct categories of patients that can explain the relationship between psychosis and antisocial behaviours. Specifically, three pathways of offending, antisocial behaviour and psychosis have been described and there is an evolving empirical evidence base to suggest that these pathways are aetiologically distinct. Firstly, there is a pathway for early-start offenders, which have been identified as those with psychosis preceded by Conduct Disorder (SZ + CD). Secondly, a group that start to display antisocial behaviours in parallel to the onset of psychosis (SZ-AS). The third group involves those with a long history of a psychotic disorder and no history of antisocial behaviours, who will present to services following a first conviction for non-violent or violent crime (SZ). The authors hypothesise that each typology will utilise services differently throughout the clinical trajectory. This pilot study aimed to (i) examine the concurrent validity of the antisocial behaviour and psychosis typologies, and (ii) examine differences in the service utilisation patterns of patients between these groups.MethodsThe sample consisted of adult male patients admitted to low and medium secure forensic hospitals within the Northwest of England. A total of 90 patients were used.A categorisation checklist was developed, and the typology of patients determined from data collected from electronic health records. Data were collected on patient demographics, psychiatric diagnosis, aetiological factors, and service utilisation. Two researchers reviewed the data and determined the typology. Statistical analysis aimed to assess the difference in aetiological variables between the typologies and examine the relationship with how each typology utilised services.ResultsThis study provided further evidence of distinguishing characteristics emphasising typology heterogeneity.The CD-SZ group were more likely to have utilised mental health services <18 years (70%, p = 0.062), and to have used services preceding a diagnosis of psychosis (60%, p = 0.011). Following the onset of a psychotic disorder, the AS-SZ and SZ groups had a higher proportion that used general adult psychiatry services (p = 0.031), with CD-SZ coming in to contact with forensic psychiatry services and criminal justice services earlier and more frequently.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that each typology has a different clinical trajectory through mental health services. This provides further empirical evidence towards different clinical typologies and trajectories of individuals with psychosis and anti-social behaviour. Understanding more about how these typologies utilise services will enable clinicians to introduce interventions help develop effective management plans that address the distinct characteristics of each typology of offender with psychosis.
Psychiatric risks associated with ligature-tying present significant management challenges for inpatient multidisciplinary teams (MDT). Accurate and detailed clinical information capture following incidents involving ligatures is necessary to inform future risk management. A documentation tool is presented whichhas been demonstrated to improve the accuracy of recording of clinical risk information following inpatient ligature incidents in the child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS) psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU) setting. The LIGATURE RECORD tool provides a highly useable prompt for information capture of 14 important data elements identified as relevant to MDT risk formulation.The effectiveness of the LIGATURE RECORD tool was audited following its introduction in PICU in May 2020. Contemporaneous incident reports and progress note entries were examined with an improvement in the frequency of reporting of all 14 domains seen, with near-100% completeness where the prompt was used directly as a template. Particular improvements were seen in recordingof non-narrative elements such as circumstantial information and important negative reports. Formal and informal feedback from clinical staff indicated good usability and high rates of adoption of the tool.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.