BackgroundRefractory or unexplained iron deficiency anemia accounts for about 15% of all cases. The endoscopic gastrointestinal workup sometimes fails to establish the cause of iron deficiency anemia and a considerable proportion of patients regardless of risk category fail to respond to oral iron supplementation. The aim of the present study was to assess the etiological role of Helicobacter pylori infection in adult Egyptian patients with unexplained or refractory iron deficiency anemia.MethodsA case controlled study was composed of 104 iron deficiency anemia cases and 70 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Patients were diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia according to hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, serum ferritin, and transferrin saturation. Upper and lower endoscopies were performed and active H. pylori infection was investigated by testing for the H. pylori antigen in stool specimens. Hematological response to H. pylori treatment with triple therapy together with iron therapy (n = 32) or only iron therapy (n = 32) were assessed in patients with H. pylori infection.ResultsH. pylori infection was more prevalent in patients with unexplained or refractory iron deficiency anemia (61.5%). Of the different hematological parameters investigated, there was a significant correlation only between H. pylori infection and mean corpuscular volume (p-value 0.046). Moreover, there was a significant correlation between receiving triple therapy together with iron supplementation and improvements in the hematological parameters [hemoglobin (p-value < 0.001), mean corpuscular volume (p-value < 0.001), iron (p-value < 0.001) and serum ferritin (p-value < 0.001)] compared to receiving iron supplementation alone.ConclusionsFailing to test for H. pylori infection could lead to a failure to identify a treatable cause of anemia and could lead to additional and potentially unnecessary investigations. Furthermore, treatment of H. pylori infection together with iron supplementation gives a more rapid and satisfactory response.
Background
Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare acquired bleeding disorder occurred due to the formation of inhibitory antibodies neutralizing endogenous factor VIII.
Main body
About half the cases are idiopathic. Symptoms include severe and unexpected bleeding that could be life-threatening. High index of suspicion should be raised when unexplained subcutaneous or post-surgical bleeding with isolated prolonged APTT.
Conclusions
Acquired hemophilia A is a rare underdiagnosed underreported acquired hemostatic disorder that presents with sudden usually life-threatening bleeding; it is crucial to raise awareness and suspicion index of clinicians for early diagnosis and treatment to avoid morbidity and mortality.
The current results conform to the reported literature on the outcome of TTP. The very early mortality due to late referral highlights the need of education about the disease among primary healthcare providers.
To evaluate the utility of the 4Ts clinical scoring system as a pretest probability method for detection of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Medical and surgical inpatients and outpatients at Kasr El Eini hospital. This single-centre series of 50 HIT testing referrals assessed combination of clinical score (thrombocytopenia, timing, thrombosis, other causes of thrombocytopenia not evident; 4T's), Heparin platelet factor 4 (H-PF4) rapid particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA) and 14C serotonin release assay (SRA) to develop a practical and well tolerated diagnostic strategy for HIT. Sixteen patients (32%) had a low 4T's score, 26 (52%) had an intermediate score and only eight (16%) had a high score. A positive H-PF4 by PaGIA was seen in seven patients (14%). As might be anticipated, the likelihood of obtaining a positive H-PF4 by PaGIA increased with an increasing clinical score, with positive H-PF4 by PaGIA results in low, intermediate and high scoring patients of 6.25, 7.7 and 50%, respectively. The positive predictive value of a positive PaGIA was 92%. The negative predictive value was 100%. Five patients (10%) in our cohort had a positive SRA. All patients with a positive SRA were included in the intermediate (two of 26 patients, 7.7%) or high (three of eight patients, 37.5%) score groups. The negative predictive value of a low 4T's score was 100%, effectively ruling out HIT. A low 4Ts score supports low probability of HIT based on the results of the PaGIA and SRA. Overall, the interrater reliability of the scoring system was fair.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.