BackgroundDespite increasing ethical standards for conducting animal research, death is still often used as an endpoint in mouse sepsis studies. Recently, the Murine Sepsis Score (MSS), Mouse Clinical Assessment Score for Sepsis (M-CASS), and Mouse Grimace Scale (MGS) were developed as surrogate endpoint scoring systems for assessing pain and disease severity in mice. The objective of our study was to compare the effectiveness of these scoring systems and monitoring of body temperature for predicting disease progression and death in the cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) sepsis model, in order to better inform selection of surrogate endpoints for death in experimental sepsis.MethodsC57Bl/6J mice were subjected to control sham surgery, or moderate or severe CLP sepsis. All mice were monitored every 4 h for surrogate markers of death using modified versions of the MSS, M-CASS, and MGS scoring systems until 24 h post-operatively, or until endpoint (inability to ambulate) and consequent euthanasia.ResultsThirty percent of mice subjected to moderate severity CLP reached endpoint by 24 h post-CLP, whereas 100% undergoing severe CLP reached endpoint within 20 h. Modified MSS, M-CASS, and MGS scores all increased, while body temperature decreased, in a time-dependent and sepsis severity-dependent manner, although modified M-CASS scores showed substantial variability. Receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrate that the last recorded body temperature (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI 0.77–0.99), change in body temperature (AUC = 0.89; 95% CI 0.78–0.99), modified M-CASS (AUC = 0.93; 95% CI 0.85–1.00), and modified MSS (AUC = 0.95; 95% CI 0.88–1.01) scores are all robust for predicting death in CLP sepsis, whereas modified MGS (AUC = 0.78; 95% CI 0.63–0.92) is less robust.ConclusionsThe modified MSS and body temperature are effective markers for assessing disease severity and predicting death in the CLP model, and should thus be considered as valid surrogate markers to replace death as an endpoint in mouse CLP sepsis studies.

Background: Excessive production of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in sepsis contributes to vascular occlusion by acting as a scaffold and stimulus for thrombus formation. Removal of extracellular DNA, the major structural component of NETs, by DNase I may reduce host injury. Objectives: (1)To determine how heparin variants (unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, Vasoflux, and fondaparinux) affect DNase I activity, (2)to measure temporal changes in circulating DNA and DNase I in septic patients. Methods: DNA-histone complexes were treated with DNase I AE heparin variants and visualized via agarose gels. We compared the ability of DNase I AE heparin variants to digest NETs released by phorbol 12myristate 13-acetate-stimulated neutrophils versus DNA-histone complexes released by necrotic HEK293 cells. Plasma DNA and DNase I levels were measured longitudinally in 76 septic patients. Results: Heparin enhances DNase I-mediated digestion of DNA-histone complexes in a size-dependent manner that does not require the antithrombin-binding region. In contrast, DNase I alone was able to degrade the DNA-histone component of NETs presumably due to peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4)-mediated histone citrullination that weakens DNA-histone interactions. In purified systems, PAD4 treatment of DNA-histone complexes enhanced the ability of DNase I to degrade histone-bound DNA. In septic patients, endogenous DNase I levels remained persistently low over 28 days, and there were no significant correlations between DNA and DNase I levels. Conclusion: Heparin enhances DNA-mediated digestion of DNA-histone complexes in a sizedependent manner that is independent of its anticoagulant properties. Citrullination of histones by PAD4 renders DNAhistone complexes susceptible to DNase I digestion. Endogenous DNase I levels are persistently decreased in septic patients, which supports the potential utility of DNase I as a therapy for sepsis.

Despite decades of preclinical research, no experimentally derived therapies for sepsis have been successfully adopted into routine clinical practice. Factors that contribute to this crisis of translation include poor representation by preclinical models of the complex human condition of sepsis, bias in preclinical studies, as well as limitations of single-laboratory methodology. To overcome some of these shortcomings, multicentre preclinical studies—defined as a research experiment conducted in two or more research laboratories with a common protocol and analysis—are expected to maximize transparency, improve reproducibility, and enhance generalizability. The ultimate objective is to increase the efficiency and efficacy of bench-to-bedside translation for preclinical sepsis research and improve outcomes for patients with life-threatening infection. To this end, we organized the first meeting of the National Preclinical Sepsis Platform (NPSP). This multicentre preclinical  research collaboration of Canadian sepsis researchers and stakeholders was established to study the pathophysiology of sepsis and accelerate movement of promising therapeutics into early phase clinical trials. Integrated knowledge translation and shared decision-making were emphasized to ensure the goals of the platform align with clinical researchers and patient partners. 29 participants from 10 independent labs attended and discussed four main topics: (1) objectives of the platform; (2) animal models of sepsis; (3) multicentre methodology and (4) outcomes for evaluation. A PIRO model (predisposition, insult, response, organ dysfunction) for experimental design was proposed to strengthen linkages with interdisciplinary researchers and key stakeholders. This platform represents an important resource for maximizing translational impact of preclinical sepsis research.

Background: Extracellular histones exert cytotoxic and procoagulant effects which contribute to immunothrombosis in vascular diseases such as sepsis. Heparin has been shown to neutralize the pathologic effects of histones in vitro and in animal models. Objectives:To compare the effectiveness of unfractionated heparin (UFH), lowmolecularweight heparin (LMWH), Vasoflux (lacks anticoagulant activity), and fondaparinux in neutralizing the cytotoxic and procoagulant activities of histones Methods: Binding affinities between heparin variants and histone subunits were determined by Bio-layer Interferometry. The ability of heparin variants to diminish the cytotoxic and procoagulant effects of histones was studied by treating endothelial cells or monocytic THP-1 cells with histones ± heparin variants.Results: Unfractionated heparin, LMWH, and Vasoflux bind histone subunits with high affinities (K d <1 pM-66.7 nM) whereas fondaparinux exhibited a low affinity (K d of 3.06 µM-81.1 mM). UFH, LMWH, and Vasoflux neutralize histone-mediated cytotoxicity as well as monocytic procoagulant activity (as assessed by cell surface tissue factor and phosphatidylserine). In contrast, fondaparinux has no effect on these activities. All four heparin variants reverse histone-mediated impairment of APC generation in a dose-dependent manner. Conclusions:The ability of heparin to neutralize the cytotoxic and procoagulant effects of histones require heparin fragments >1.7 kDa and is independent of the antithrombin-binding pentasaccharide. In contrast, the ability of heparin to neutralize histone-mediated impairment of APC generation is independent of size and anticoagulant activity. These findings suggest that heparin variants may have differential therapeutic potential in vascular diseases associated with elevated levels of histones.

Introduction: Cell-free DNA (CFDNA) has emerged as a prognostic biomarker in patients with sepsis. Circulating CFDNA is hypothesized to be associated with histones in the form of nucleosomes. In vitro, DNA activates coagulation and inhibits fibrinolysis, whereas histones activate platelets and are cytotoxic to endothelial cells. Previous studies have targeted CFDNA or histones in animal models of sepsis using DNase I or heparins, respectively, which has reduced inflammatory and thrombosis markers, thereby improving survival. In this study, we explored the possibility that the combination of DNase I and a low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may be a better therapeutic approach than monotherapy in a murine model of abdominal sepsis. Methods: C57Bl/6 mice (8-12 weeks old, both sexes) were subjected to either cecal ligation and puncture or sham surgery. Mice were given antibiotics, fluids, and either saline, DNase I (intraperitoneally, 20 mg/kg/8 h), LMWH (dalteparin, subcutaneously 500 IU/kg/12 h), or a combination of both (n = 12-31). Mice were monitored over 72 h for survival. Organs and blood were harvested for analysis. Levels of LMWH, CFDNA, IL-6, citrullinated histone-H3, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, and protein C were measured in plasma. Results: Administration of either DNase I (81.8%) or LMWH (83.3%, prophylactic range of 0.12 ± 0.07 IU/mL achieved) improved the survival of septic mice compared with saline-(38.7%) and combination-treated mice (48.8%, P < 0.05). Combination-treated mice also showed a small but insignificant improvement in survival compared with saline-treated cecal ligation and puncture mice. Monotherapies may be improving survival by reducing blood bacterial loads, citrullinated histone-H3, and thrombin-antithrombin complexes, and improving protein C levels. Conclusions: Compared with saline-and combination-treated mice, administration of monotherapies to septic mice improved survival. These findings suggest that there may be a negative drug-drug interaction between DNase I and LMWH when DNase I is administered intraperitoneally in a murine model of polymicrobial abdominal sepsis.

Background The importance of investigating sex- and gender-dependent differences has been recently emphasized by major funding agencies. Notably, the influence of biological sex on clinical outcomes in sepsis is unclear, and observational studies suffer from the effect of confounding factors. The controlled experimental environment afforded by preclinical studies allows for clarification and mechanistic evaluation of sex-dependent differences. We propose a systematic review to assess the impact of biological sex on baseline responses to disease induction as well as treatment responses in animal models of sepsis. Given the lack of guidance surrounding sex-based analyses in preclinical systematic reviews, careful consideration of various factors is needed to understand how best to conduct analyses and communicate findings. Methods MEDLINE and Embase will be searched (2011-present) to identify preclinical studies of sepsis in which any intervention was administered and sex-stratified data reported. The primary outcome will be mortality. Secondary outcomes will include organ dysfunction, bacterial load, and IL-6 levels. Study selection will be conducted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. Data extraction will be conducted by one reviewer and audited by a second independent reviewer. Data extracted from included studies will be pooled, and meta-analysis will be conducted using random effects modeling. Primary analyses will be stratified by animal age and will assess the impact of sex at the following time points: pre-intervention, in response to treatment, and post-intervention. Risk of bias will be assessed using the SYRCLE’s risk-of-bias tool. Illustrative examples of potential methods to analyze sex-based differences are provided in this protocol. Discussion Our systematic review will summarize the current state of knowledge on sex-dependent differences in sepsis. This will identify current knowledge gaps that future studies can address. Finally, this review will provide a framework for sex-based analysis in future preclinical systematic reviews. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42022367726.

Background: In sepsis, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are an important interface between innate immunity and coagulation. The major structural component of neutrophil extracellular traps is nucleosomes (DNA-histone complexes). In vitro, DNA and histones exert procoagulant/cytotoxic effects whereas nucleosomes are not harmful. However, whether DNA, histones, and/or nucleosomes exert harmful effects in vivo remain unclear. Objectives: (1) The aims of the study are to investigate the cytotoxic effects of nucleosomes ± DNase I and heparin in vitro and (2) to investigate whether DNA, histones, and/or nucleosomes are harmful when injected into healthy and septic mice. Methods: The cytotoxic effects of DNA, histones, and nucleosomes (± DNaseI or ±heparin) were assessed in HEK293 cells. Mice underwent cecal ligation and puncture or sham surgery and then received injections of DNA (8 mg/kg), histones (8.5 mg/kg), or nucleosomes at 4 and 6 h. Organs and blood were harvested at 8 h. Cell-free DNA, IL-6, thrombin-anti-thrombin, and protein C were quantified from plasma. Results: In vitro, incubation of HEK293 cells with DNaseI-treated nucleosomes reduced cell survival compared with nucleosome-treated cells, suggesting that DNaseI releases cytotoxic histones from nucleosomes. Addition of heparin to DNaseI-treated nucleosomes rescued cell death. In vivo, administration of histones to septic mice increased markers of inflammation (IL-6) and coagulation (thrombin-anti-thrombin), which was not observed in sham or septic mice administered DNA or nucleosomes. Conclusions: Our studies suggest that DNA masks the harmful effects of histones in vitro and in vivo. Although administration of histones contributed to the pathogenesis of sepsis, administration of nucleosomes or DNA was not harmful in healthy or septic mice.

Background Preclinical sepsis models have been criticized for their inability to recapitulate human sepsis and suffer from methodological shortcomings that limit external validity and reproducibility. The National Preclinical Sepsis Platform (NPSP) is a consortium of basic science researchers, veterinarians, and stakeholders in Canada undertaking standardized multi-laboratory sepsis research to increase the efficacy and efficiency of bench-to-bedside translation. In this study, we aimed to develop and characterize a 72-h fecal-induced peritonitis (FIP) model of murine sepsis conducted in two independent laboratories. The experimental protocol was optimized by sequentially modifying dose of fecal slurry and timing of antibiotics in an iterative fashion, and then repeating the experimental series at site 1 and site 2. Results Escalating doses of fecal slurry (0.5–2.5 mg/g) resulted in increased disease severity, as assessed by the modified Murine Sepsis Score (MSS). However, the MSS was poorly associated with progression to death during the experiments, and mice were found dead without elevated MSS scores. Administration of early antibiotics within 4 h of inoculation rescued the animals from sepsis compared with late administration of antibiotics after 12 h, as evidenced by 100% survival and reduced bacterial load in peritoneum and blood in the early antibiotic group. Site 1 and site 2 had statistically significant differences in mortality (60% vs 88%; p < 0.05) for the same dose of fecal slurry (0.75 mg/g) and marked differences in body temperature between groups. Conclusions We demonstrate a systematic approach to optimizing a 72-h FIP model of murine sepsis for use in multi-laboratory studies. Alterations to experimental conditions, such as dose of fecal slurry and timing of antibiotics, have clear impact on outcomes. Differences in mortality between sites despite rigorous standardization warrants further investigations to better understand inter-laboratory variation and methodological design in preclinical studies.