Cutaneous melanoma is responsible for the vast majority of skin cancer-related deaths in the United States. Known risk factors include genetic defects, environmental exposures, and a combination of both. Among environmental risks, exposure to ultraviolet rays is the most important and the most modifiable risk factor. Several genetic syndromes involve increased risk of melanoma, including xeroderma pigmentosum, familial atypical multiple moles and melanoma syndrome, BRCA2 mutation, and congenital melanocytic nevi. Although the necessity of implementation remains controversial, the most effective melanoma screening technique is the whole-body skin examination. Typically, melanoma lesions are incidentally discovered during routine skin examination using the "ABCDE" mnemonic. Once suspected, questions pertaining to the sites of potential metastasis should be asked and excisional or partial biopsy should be considered. The primary histologic subtypes of melanoma include superficial spreading, lentigo maligna, nodular, acral lentiginous, desmoplastic, and amelanotic. Melanoma staging is completed via clinical and histologic assessment using the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM system. Delayed or deficient elements of initial melanoma evaluation can limit patient outcomes and increase disease-related mortality. Clinicians involved in the diagnosis or treatment of cutaneous melanoma must be familiar with the available screening options, key steps of diagnosis, and the staging ramifications of disease discovery.
Despite the development of multiple cranial bone substitutes, calvarial reconstruction remains a significant challenge. Although autologous bone is preferred in many cases, its usefulness may be limited by difficulty with contouring, resorption, and donor site availability and morbidity. Alloplastic cranioplasties are also widely used with each material having its advantages and disadvantages. Computer-designed implants have the advantages of minimizing operative time for preparation, shaping, and insetting. We report our initial clinical experience in 6 patients with computer-designed, prefabricated polyetheretherketone implants, which may have significant advantages over other alloplastic materials in terms of strength, stiffness, durability, thermal conductivity, and radiographic translucency.
Objective:To analyze the effect of economic and racial/ethnic residential segregation on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in South Florida, a diverse metropolitan area that mirrors the projected demographics of many United States regions.Summary Background Data:Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, racial and economic disparities in BCSS. This study evaluates these disparities through the lens of racial and economic residential segregation, which approximate the impact of structural racism.Methods:Retrospective cohort study of stage I to IV breast cancer patients treated at our institution from 2005 to 2017. Our exposures include index of concentration at the extremes, a measurement of economic and racial neighborhood segregation, which was computed at the census-tract level using American Community Survey data. The primary outcome was BCSS.Results:Random effects frailty models predicted that patients living in low-income neighborhoods had higher mortality compared to those living in high-income neighborhoods [hazard ratios (HR): 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23–2.00]. Patients living in low-income non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic neighborhoods had higher mortality compared to those living in high-income non-Hispanic White (NHW) neighborhoods (HR: 2.43, 95%CI: 1.72, 3.43) and (HR: 1.99, 95%CI: 1.39, 2.84), after controlling for patient characteristics, respectively. In adjusted race-stratified analysis, NHWs living in low-income non-Hispanic Black neighborhoods had higher mortality compared to NHWs living in high-income NHW neighborhoods (HR: 4.09, 95%CI: 2.34–7.06).Conclusions:Extreme racial/ethnic and economic segregation were associated with lower BCSS. We add novel insight regarding NHW and Hispanics to a growing body of literature that demonstrate how the ecological effects of structural racism—expressed through poverty and residential segregation—shape cancer survival.
The ALT free flap is a versatile, reliable flap that should be considered a first-line option for skull base reconstruction. Operative time is minimized by performing a simultaneous two-team approach to resection and reconstruction, and by harvesting nerve, vein, and fascial grafts from the same donor site as the flap.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.