Previous studies have suggested that the gut microbiome influences the response to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in patients with cancer. CBM588 is a bifidogenic live bacterial product that we postulated could augment CPI response through modulation of the gut microbiome. In this open-label, single-center study (NCT03829111), 30 treatment-naive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with clear cell and/or sarcomatoid histology and intermediate- or poor-risk disease were randomized 2:1 to receive nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without daily oral CBM588, respectively. Stool metagenomic sequencing was performed at multiple timepoints. The primary endpoint to compare the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. at baseline and at 12 weeks was not met, and no significant differences in Bifidobacterium spp. or Shannon index associated with the addition of CBM588 to nivolumab–ipilimumab were detected. Secondary endpoints included response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. PFS was significantly longer in patients receiving nivolumab–ipilimumab with CBM588 than without (12.7 months versus 2.5 months, hazard ratio 0.15, 95% confidence interval 0.05–0.47, P = 0.001). Although not statistically significant, the response rate was also higher in patients receiving CBM588 (58% versus 20%, P = 0.06). No significant difference in toxicity was observed between the study arms. The data suggest that CBM588 appears to enhance the clinical outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab–ipilimumab. Larger studies are warranted to confirm this clinical observation and elucidate the mechanism of action and the effects on microbiome and immune compartments.

No abstract

Trabectedin (ET743, Yondelis®, manufactured by Baxter Oncology GmbH, Halle/Westfalen, Germany, for Janssen Products, LP, Horsham, PA), derived from the marine ascidian, Ecteinascidia turbinata, is a natural alkaloid with multiple complex mechanisms of action. On 23 October 2015, 15 years after the results of the first Phase 1 clinical trial using trabectedin for chemotherapy-resistant solid malignancies was reported, and 8 years after its approval in Europe, the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) finally approved trabectedin for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma that has failed a prior anthracycline-containing regimen. Approval was based on the results of a pivotal Phase 3 trial involving a 2:1 randomization of 518 patients (who were further stratified by soft tissue sarcoma subtype), in which a significant improvement in progression-free survival was reported in the trabectedin-treated group vs. the dacarbazine-treated group (p < 0.001). In this trial, the most common adverse reactions were nausea, fatigue, vomiting, constipation, anorexia, diarrhea, peripheral edema, dyspnea, and headache, while the most serious were neutropenic sepsis, rhabdomyolysis, cardiomyopathy, hepatotoxicity, and extravasation leading to tissue necrosis. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were laboratory abnormalities of myelosuppression in both arms and transient transaminitis in the trabectedin arm. In a recent Phase 2 trial, trabectedin had a similar outcome as doxorubicin when given as a single agent in the first-line setting. Studies are also being conducted to expand the use of trabectedin not only as a first-line cancer drug, but also for a number of other clinical indications, for example, in the case of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, for which trabectedin has been reported to be exceptionally active. The possibility of combining trabectedin with targeted therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors or virotherapy would also be an interesting concept. In short, trabectedin is an old new drug with proven potential to impact the lives of patients with soft tissue sarcoma and other solid malignancies.Funding: Sarcoma Oncology Center, Santa Monica, CA 90405.

No abstract

4513 Background: Recent evidence suggests that the gut microbiome is a potent mediator of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), with both specific bacterial species and cumulative microbial diversity driving response (Routy et al Science 2018; Salgia et al Eur Urol 2020). We examined whether the butyrate-producing bacterium Clostridium butyricum, the key constituent of CBM-588, could modulate the gut microbiome in patients (pts) with mRCC receiving nivolumab/ipilimumab (N/I) and secondarily improve clinical outcome. Methods: An open-label, randomized study was conducted, with key eligibility criteria including confirmed clear cell and/or sarcomatoid mRCC, intermediate/poor risk by IMDC criteria and no systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either N/I+CBM-588 or N/I alone. N/I was dosed at 3 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 12 weeks, followed by N at 480 mg IV every 4 weeks. CBM-588 was dosed orally at 80 mg bid. Stool was collected for bacteriomic profiling at baseline and 12 weeks. Metagenomic sequencing was employed using previously published methods (Dizman et al Cancer Med 2020). The primary endpoint of the study was change in Bifidobacterium spp. from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints included change in microbial diversity and clinical outcomes including response rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 30 pts were randomized between April 2019 and Nov 2020; 1 pt was excluded after genomic sequencing clarified a diagnosis of sarcoma. Among 29 evaluable patients (21:8 M:F), median age was 66, 10 pts (34%) had sarcomatoid features and 24 pts (83%) were intermediate risk. Metagenomic sequencing of paired stool specimens showed an 8-fold increase in B. bifidum and a 6-fold increase in B. adolescentis in pts receiving N/I+CBM-588 from baseline to week 12. C. butyricum was detected only in pts receiving CBM-588. Pathogenic species (e.g., Escherichia. coli and Klebsiella spp.) were more prevalent in pts not receiving CBM-588. RR was significantly higher among pts receiving N/I+CBM-588 vs N/I alone (59% vs 11%; P = 0.024). Median PFS was also prolonged with the addition of CBM-588 to N/I (NR vs 11 weeks; P < 0.001). No significant difference in grade 3/4 toxicities were observed between study arms. Conclusions: This is the first randomized, prospective study to suggest enhancement of ICI response with a live bacterial product. The observed clinical impact is corroborated by biologic findings supporting gut modulation by CBM-588. Clinical trial information: NCT03829111.

Giant-cell tumor of bone is a rare, locally aggressive tumor that typically occurs in the bones of skeletally mature young adults in their second to fourth decades. Traditionally, surgery has been the mainstay of therapy for this disease, but the disease can recur even with optimal procedures. Furthermore, it may occur in locations where a surgical approach would be morbid. The maturation of the understanding of the role of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) in the pathophysiology of giant-cell tumor of bone has led to the use of denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANKL, in this disease. In 2013, the US Food and Drug Administration approved denosumab for use in patients with recurrent/unresectable/metastatic giant-cell tumor of bone or for patients in whom surgery would be morbid.

Purpose: The role of circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) as an adjunct to tissue genomic profiling is poorly defined in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In this study, we aim to validate previous findings related to genomic alteration (GA) frequency in ctDNA and determine the concordance between ctDNA and tissue-based profiling in patients with mRCC. Experimental Design: Results of 839 patients with mRCC who had ctDNA assessment with a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified ctDNA assay between November 2016 and December 2019 were collected. Tissue-based genomic profiling was collected when available and concordance analysis between blood- and tissue-based testing was performed. Results: ctDNA was assessed in 839 patients (comprising 920 samples) with mRCC. GAs were detected in 661 samples (71.8%). Tissue-based GAs were assessed in 112 patients. Limiting our analyses to a common 73-/74-gene set and excluding samples with no ctDNA detected, a total of 228 mutations were found in tissue and blood. Mutations identified in tissue (34.7%; 42/121) were also identified via ctDNA, whereas 28.2% (42/149) of the mutations identified in liquid were also identified via tissue. Concordance between ctDNA and tissue-based profiling was inversely related to the time elapsed between these assays. Conclusions: This study confirms the feasibility of ctDNA profiling in the largest mRCC cohort to date, with ctDNA identifying multiple actionable alterations. It also demonstrates that ctDNA and tissue-based genomic profiling are complementary, with both platforms identifying unique alterations, and confirms that the frequency of unique alterations increases with greater temporal separation between tests.

No abstract