Background: The management of acute colonic injury has been improved since several decades, treating low risk patients withprimary closure and high risk patients (duration 6 hours or more, shock, contamination, transfusions 6 unit or more and multipleorgans injury) with colostomy.Objective: To assess the outcomes of primary closure and exteriorization in acute colonic injuries.Material and Methods: This Comparative study was carried out in the Casualty Department DHQ teaching Hospital Bannu, fromJan.2009 to Dec.2010. Thirty Eight patients of acute abdominal trauma, who attended the emergency department, were included.Majority of the patients were those of fire arm injured, followed by blunt abdominal trauma. Less frequent were penetrating traumadue to stab and bomb blast pieces. As part of their resuscitation, they were shifted to operation theatre for abdominal explorationand either primary Closure/ Resection and primary anastomosis was done or colostomy of injured colon performed keeping in mindthe Protocol of low and high risk categories respectively. The results obtained were subjected to statistical analysis by using SPSSsoftware version 20, and showed significant differences except wound infection when compared complications between primaryclosure & Colostomy procedures.Results: Primary Closure was carried out in 18 of 38 patients (47.4%) in low risk category while Colostomy was done in 20 of 38(52.6%) in high risk patients. (69%) of the patients were below 40 years of their age and (31%) were above 40 years. In our seriesfire arm was more common (78.9%) weapon for penetrating abdominal trauma. Isolated Colonic injury was rare 10.6% as colonicinjury was usually associated with other organ injuries (89.4%). Morbidity was comparable in both procedures. Wound infectionrecorded was (22%) in Primary Closure & (20%) in Colostomy. Mortality recorded was (5.5%) in Primary Closure & (10%) inColostomy patients. Anastomotic leakage was recorded in one patient with primary closure where re colostomy saved the patient.Mean Hospital stay was 13days.Conclusion: Primary Closure/Resection and Primary Anastomosis is having good results, in low risk patients but Colostomy ofinjured Colon is valuable in high risk and in patients who develop complications after Primary Closure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.