Excessive ingestion of fluorides might adversely affect the health of humans. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the concentrations of infusible fluoride in five different types of tea and herbal products; additionally, the probabilistic health risks associated with the ingestion of fluoride in drinking tea and herbal products were estimated. The highest and lowest concentrations of infusible fluoride were detected in black and white tea, respectively. On average, the highest amount of infusible fluoride was extracted following a short brewing time of 5 min in the case of black tea (2.54 mg/L), herbal tea (0.40 mg/L), and white tea (0.21 mg/L). The level of infusible fluoride during brewing was inversely associated with the leaf size of the tea and herbal products. Furthermore, the type of water used influenced the release of infusible fluoride; purified water yielded lower amounts of infused fluoride. The findings of the probabilistic health risk assessment indicated that the consumption of black tea can increase the fluoride intake leading to chronic exposure. Thus, the health risk posed by fluoride intake from drinking tea needs to be evaluated in more details in the future. Appropriate measures for health risk mitigation need to be implemented to minimize the total body burden of fluorides in humans.

Aim To evaluate fracture resistance and gap/void presence of root‐filled mandibular molars restored with 2 bulk‐fill and 1 conventional resin composites, with or without a glass‐ionomer cement (GIC) base. Methods Coronal access and mesio‐occlusal (MO) cavities were prepared, then root canal treatment was performed on 30 mol/L. The teeth were randomly divided, according to the cavity volume, into 6 experimental groups (N = 5) and restored with conventional/light‐cured (Ceram‐X), bulk‐fill/light‐cured (SureFil SDR) or bulk‐fill/dual‐cured (Core‐X Flow) with/without a 2‐mm thick GIC base. Gaps and voids (%) were determined using microcomputed tomography. Intact teeth and unrestored teeth were used as negative and positive controls. Fracture load (N) was determined using a universal testing machine. Results No significant difference in fracture resistance or gap/void formation was found among the 3 resin composites. GIC‐base groups revealed significantly lower fracture strength than intact teeth, while fracture strengths of no GIC‐base groups were not significantly different from intact teeth. GIC‐base groups revealed significantly more gaps and voids in the area of the GIC than the resin composite. Conclusion Conventional and bulk‐fill resin composites provided similar fracture resistance and gaps/voids in root‐filled molars with MO cavities. Placing a GIC base decreased fracture resistance and increased gap/void formation.