Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by inappropriately elevated glucose levels as a result of impaired pancreatic β cell function and insulin resistance. Extensive studies have been conducted to elucidate the mechanism involved in the development of β cell failure and death under diabetic conditions such as hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and inflammation. Of the plethora of proposed mechanisms, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress have been shown to play a central role in promoting β cell dysfunction. It has become more evident in recent years that these 3 factors are closely interrelated and importantly aggravate each other. Oxidative stress in particular is of great interest to β cell health and survival as it has been shown that β cells exhibit lower antioxidative capacity. Therefore, this review will focus on discussing factors that contribute to the development of oxidative stress in pancreatic β cells and explore the downstream effects of oxidative stress on β cell function and health. Furthermore, antioxidative capacity of β cells to counteract these effects will be discussed along with new approaches focused on preserving β cells under oxidative conditions.

Obesity, a metabolic disorder characterized by excessive accumulation of adipose tissue, has globally become an increasingly prevalent disease. Extensive studies have been conducted to elucidate the underlying mechanism of the development of obesity. In particular, the close association of inflammation and oxidative stress with obesity has become increasingly evident. Obesity has been shown to exhibit augmented levels of circulating proinflammatory cytokines, which have been associated with the activation of pathways linked with inflammation-induced insulin resistance, a major pathological component of obesity and several other metabolic disorders. Oxidative stress, in addition to its role in stimulating adipose differentiation, which directly triggers obesity, is considered to feed into this pathway, further aggravating insulin resistance. Nuclear factor E2 related factor 2 (Nrf2) is a basic leucine zipper transcription factor that is activated in response to inflammation and oxidative stress, and responds by increasing antioxidant transcription levels. Therefore, Nrf2 has emerged as a critical new target for combating insulin resistance and subsequently, obesity. However, the effects of Nrf2 on insulin resistance and obesity are controversial. This review focuses on the current state of research on the interplay of inflammation and oxidative stress in obesity, the role of the Nrf2 pathway in obesity and insulin resistance, and the potential use of Nrf2 activators for the treatment of insulin resistance.

Hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation is common in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Both pretransplant and post-transplant diabetes mellitus are associated with increased kidney allograft failure and mortality. Glucose management may be challenging for kidney transplant recipients. The pathophysiology and pattern of hyperglycemia in patients following kidney transplantation is different from those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In patients with pre-existing and post-transplant diabetes mellitus, there is limited data on the management of hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation. The following article discusses the nomenclature and diagnosis of pre- and post-transplant diabetes mellitus, the impact of transplant-related hyperglycemia on patient and kidney allograft outcomes, risk factors and potential pathogenic mechanisms of hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation, glucose management before and after transplantation, and modalities for prevention of post-transplant diabetes mellitus.

No abstract

ImportanceThere are over 2 million undocumented immigrants (UI) in California, where currently, all individuals regardless of immigration status have access to kidney transplant. There is a medical perception that UI face a higher risk of transplant failure due to language barriers and lack of access to immunosuppressive medication and health care when compared with US residents (UR).ObjectiveTo elucidate the kidney transplant outcomes of UI at an academic medical center in California.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA retrospective cohort study was conducted from a single transplant center during an 8-year study period. Patients who received a kidney transplant at the University of California, Irvine, between January 1, 2012, and September 1, 2019, were included in this study. Data were analyzed from October 2020 to August 2021.ExposuresThe primary exposure of this study was citizenship status. UI were defined as immigrants residing in the US without permission or legal documentation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was all-cause graft loss defined as the return to dialysis, need for a second kidney transplant, or death. The secondary end points of this study were all-cause mortality and rejection. All-cause mortality between the 2 groups was compared using multiple Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Other transplant outcomes, including all-cause graft loss and acute rejection, were examined by competing risks regressions with mortality and mortality plus graft loss serving as competing risks, respectively.ResultsOf all 446 consecutive kidney transplant recipients, the mean (SD) age was 47 (13) years; 261 patients (59%) were male, and 114 (26%) were UI. During a median (IQR) follow-up time of 3.39 (0.04-8.11) years, 6 UI and 48 UR experienced all-cause graft loss. UR had a 192% (hazard ratio, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.21-6.85; P = .01) and 343% (hazard ratio, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.05-18.69; P = .04) significantly increased unadjusted risk for all-cause graft loss and all-cause mortality, respectively. These results became nonsignificant and were mostly attenuated when adjusted for age and ethnicity. Finally, there was no difference in incidence rate of kidney allograft rejection between the 2 groups (UR, 3.5 per 100 person-years vs UI, 2.4 per 100 person-years; rate ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.90-5.05; P = .08).Conclusions and RelevanceThis single-center cohort study found that kidney transplant outcomes of UI were not inferior to those of UR. Across the US, however, UI have consistently had unequal access to transplantation. These findings suggest that extending kidney transplants to UI is safe and does not portend worse outcomes. As a result, denying transplant according to immigration status not only results in higher costs but also worse end stage kidney disease outcomes for an already underserved population.