OBJECTIVES:The usefulness of non-magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NBI; NM-NBI) in the screening of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) remains unclear. Here, we aimed to compare NM-NBI and chromoendoscopy with iodine staining (CE-Iodine) in terms of the diagnostic performance, and to evaluate the usefulness of NM-NBI in detecting early esophageal SCC.METHODS:We prospectively enrolled 202 consecutive patients (male/female=180/22; median age, 67 years) with high-risk factors for esophageal SCC. All patients received endoscopic examination with NM-NBI and CE-Iodine to screen for early esophageal SCC or HGIN. We conducted the examinations sequentially, and calculated the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity through a per-lesion-based analysis. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce the effects of selection bias, and we compared the respective outcomes according to NM-NBI and CE-Iodine after matching.RESULTS:The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of NM-NBI were 77.0, 88.3, and 75.2%, respectively, and those for unstained areas by CE-Iodine were 68.0, 94.2, and 64.0, respectively. The accuracy and specificity of NM-NBI were superior to those of CE-Iodine (P=0.03 and P=0.01, respectively). However, the sensitivity did not significantly differ between NM-NBI and CE-Iodine (P=0.67). The accuracy and specificity of NM-NBI before matching were superior to those of CE-Iodine after matching (P=0.04 and P=0.03).CONCLUSIONS:NM-NBI was useful and reliable for the diagnosis of esophageal SCC and can be a promising screening strategy for early esophageal SCC.
Background and Aim: The medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), low-dose corticosteroids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). We evaluated the incidence of small bowel injury in RA patients who were taking anti-RA drugs with or without concomitant NSAIDs by capsule endoscopy. Methods: A total of 28 RA patients who took low-dose corticosteroids and/or DMARDs for more than 1 year were enrolled. Results: The incidence of red spots did not differ between the 2 groups: 14 of 16 patients (87.5%) in the NSAID group and 11 of 12 patients (91.7%) in the non-NSAID group. In contrast, the incidence of mucosal breaks was significantly higher in the NSAID group than in the non-NSAID group: mucosal breaks were detected in 13 of 16 patients (81.3%) and 4 of 12 patients (33.3%) in the NSAID and non-NSAID groups, respectively. In the NSAID group, mucosal breaks developed in users of preferential cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors at a frequency similar to that in users of traditional NSAIDs. Conclusion: Patients taking anti-RA drugs may have an increased frequency of small bowel injury regardless of NSAID use, and NSAID use may be associated with an increased incidence of severe small bowel injury.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.