Background Acquired hemophilia A is a rare bleeding disorder caused by autoantibodies that inhibit coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The disorder is understudied given its rarity and there are no randomized prospective trials to guide therapy. In practice, treatment involves attaining hemostasis and eliminating the FVIII inhibitor, typically with high-dose steroids (1 mg/kg daily) and either cyclophosphamide or rituximab. However, current approaches carry risk of significant adverse events and delayed or inadequate responses. Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody that targets coagulation factors IXa and X to recapitulate the function of endogenous FVIII. We present a case series of patients with acquired hemophilia A who were successfully treated with a regimen consisting of rituximab and emicizumab. Methods We identified patients >18 years who were diagnosed with acquired hemophilia A and received treatment with rituximab and emicizumab at Brigham and Women's Hospital between 2019 and 2020. We performed a retrospective chart review. Data collected included the patients' clinical presentation, laboratory studies (including coagulation testing, FVIII activity, and FVIII inhibitor titer), and treatments received (including systemic therapies, recombinant factor VIIa [rFVIIa], red blood cell [RBC] transfusions, and vascular embolization). We recorded the time to normalization of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and chromogenic FVIII activity following emicizumab and rituximab initiation, respectively. Activated prothrombin complex concentrate was avoided given the use of emicizumab. Results We identified 8 patients with acquired hemophilia A who received treatment with emicizumab and rituximab. The median patient age was 81 (range 47-93). All patients sought medical attention for extensive ecchymoses or bleeding and were found to have prolonged aPTT leading to FVIII inhibitor identification (Table 1). The median inhibitor titer was 18 Bethesda units (range 9.2-107.5). Patients concurrently received 4 weekly doses of rituximab 375mg/m2 and 4 weekly loading doses of emicizumab 3mg/kg. Patient (Pt) #1 continued emicizumab 3mg/kg every two weeks to complete three months of treatment. Pts #2, #3, and #8 received high-dose prednisone (1mg/kg) at the start of treatment for a range of 10-14 days. Pt #8 received 7 additional days of prednisone for an initial aPTT of 60.7 seconds before starting emicizumab and rituximab; she had no clinical response when treated with prednisone alone. Pts #2, #5, and #7 required vascular embolization. 7 patients (Pts #2 through #8) had aPTT retested within 1 week of starting emicizumab, and the aPTT for these patients normalized within 10 days of starting emicizumab (i.e. after only 1-2 doses; Figure 1). Except for Pt #5 who had recurrent hematuria from a persistent anatomic bladder defect that eventually required prostatic artery embolization, patients did not require rFVIIa or RBC transfusions for more than 7 days after starting emicizumab. Except for Pt #5 who required 28 doses of rFVIIa and 3 units of RBC transfusions after starting emicizumab, the median number of rFVIIa doses and RBC units given to the remaining 7 patients was zero (range 0-6 doses) and zero (range 0-4 units), respectively. Pts #2 and #3 had chromogenic FVIII levels obtained >30 days after starting rituximab with improvement in FVIII activity to 29% (day 71) and 86% (day 91), respectively. During a median follow-up of 102 days, no patients experienced recurrent bleeding. However, Pt #3 exhibited a slowly increasing aPTT that reached 46.3 seconds on day 233 of follow-up without symptoms; further diagnostic testing is pending. Conclusion Our case series demonstrates that the combination of rituximab and emicizumab can be an effective and safe regimen for the treatment of acquired hemophilia A. No thrombotic events or thrombotic microangiopathy occurred. Treatment with weekly emicizumab led to aPTT normalization after 1-2 doses and facilitated hemostasis, as reflected by a median usage of zero rFVIIA doses and zero RBC transfusions after starting emicizumab when excluding one patient with hematuria from an anatomic defect. This compares favorably to historical reports. While no patient has had recurrent bleeding, additional chromogenic FVIII activity testing for patients is needed to confirm long-term normalization of FVIII activity. Disclosures Gibson: Ampressa therapeutics: Current equity holder in private company; nference: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company; ImmPACT-Bio: Consultancy; Boston Clinical Research Institute: Consultancy. Parnes:Bayer: Consultancy; I-Mab: Consultancy; Sunovion: Consultancy; UniQure: Consultancy; Sigilon: Consultancy; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Geron: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. OffLabel Disclosure: Emicizumab is used off-label in our case series for the treatment of acquired hemophilia A.
Von Willebrand disease, (VWD) disproportionately affects women due to potential issues with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), delivery complications, and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). To systematically synthesize the evidence regarding first line management of HMB, treatment of women requiring/desiring neuraxial analgesia, and management of PPH. We searched Medline and EMBASE through October 2019 for randomized trials, comparative observational studies, and case series comparing the effects of desmopressin, hormonal therapy, and tranexamic acid (TXA) on HMB, comparing different von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels in women with VWD undergoing labor and receiving neuraxial anesthesia and the effects of TXA on PPH We conducted duplicate study selection, data abstraction, and appraisal of risk of bias. Whenever possible, we conducted meta-analyses. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We included 1 randomized trial, 3 comparative observational studies and 10 case series. Moderate certainty evidence showed that desmopressin results in a smaller reduction of menstrual blood loss (difference in mean change from baseline, 41.6 [95% CI, 16.6 to 63.6] points in pictorial blood assessment chart score as compared to TXA. There was very low certainty evidence about how first line treatments compare against each other, the effects of different VWF levels in women receiving neuraxial anesthesia, and the effects of TXA administration postpartum. Most of the evidence relevant to the gynecologic and obstetric management of women with VWD addressed by most guidelines is very low quality. Future studies addressing research priorities will be key when updating such guidelines.
Key PointsClinical, research and mentorship experiences in hematology are positively associated with fellows' plans to pursue hematology-only careers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.