The requirement to remember continuously changing information places substantial demands on the human operator's working memory system. Previous research (Yntema & Mueser, 1960) found that in keeping track of dynamically changing information, humans' memory for changing information was better when they kept track of many different attributes of a single object than when they kept track of the identical attribute of many different objects. Due to a confound in the Yntema and Mueser experiment, the unique and combined effects of information organization and similarity-based interference cannot be determined, limiting the information about dynamic memory. This experiment represents an attempt to overcome this limitation by assessing the roles of organization and similarity-based interference in dynamic memory. The experimental task was a keeping track task in which a series of changing attribute values were presented sequentially, and subjects were required to remember the most recent update for each attribute. Three factors were manipulated in the experiment: number of "objects" (one vs many objects), type of attribute (same vs different), and memory load (2,4, or 6 attributes to remember). Results showed that as memory load increased, keeping track performance in the many-object condition decreased to a greater extent than in the one-object condition. Also, as memory load increased, accuracy decreased at a greater rate for the same-attribute condition than for the different-attribute condition. The effect size for attribute similarity was much larger than that for number of objects. It was concluded that similarity-based interference is quite destructive to dynamic memory. It appears that the cost of attribute similarity far outweighs the benefits of organizing the continually-changing attributes. Such results have implications for structuring tasks and aiding memory in situations where operators must remember information in dynamically changing environments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.