VCP for the treatment of depression is a promising method for delivering mental health services. More rigorous research is needed to evaluate VCP on depression in various contexts and participants.
Results provide promise for evidence-based interventions delivered via videoconferencing psychological therapy. More rigorous research is needed in various settings and populations.
Objectives With telemedicine becoming more widely implemented in emergency situations, understanding the quality and content of current findings that explore prehospital telemedicine is vital to establish best practices and guide future research. This systematic review examines the clinical importance of telemedicine in patient-provider ambulance-based settings with a focus on multifunctional systems for general prehospital emergency populations. Methods Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology we found 1564 abstracts, which were blind-reviewed by independent reviewers. Relevant articles were reviewed, classified, and analyzed according to research methods and technology type, as well as quality, cost, and satisfaction. The studies were also reviewed for validated evidence-based practice. Results Those studies that looked at cost, quality, and satisfaction with care generally shared favorable results. Setup notwithstanding, cost was comparable or less than controls. Care quality was also found to be in line with or slightly preferable to face-to-face care with some advantages in response time and quality. Patients and providers were satisfied with the systems. Common obstacles included limited bandwidth and small sample sizes. Conclusions Although feasibility remains salient, research regarding the impact of ambulance-based telemedicine on patients and healthcare providers is encouraging, but nascent. As a whole, this body of literature does not yet adequately speak to the most important concerns of medicine: quality, cost, and satisfaction. More research is needed in each of these areas. However, those studies that do address these matters share hopeful results. Future research should test these mechanisms in prehospital settings with greater rigor.
Depression and anxiety are the most common mental illnesses in adolescents. Rural schools are well-positioned to narrow the access gap confronting rural adolescents experiencing depression and anxiety; however, there is a paucity of research on the treatment of depression and anxiety in rural high schools. This critical review summarized the state of the field on rural school-based interventions to reduce adolescent depression and anxiety. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, PsychINFO, EMBASE, ERIC, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria identified peer-reviewed articles evaluating rural high-school based interventions for the treatment of depression and/or anxiety. Of the 322 articles screened, 82 articles were reviewed, with four articles satisfying inclusion criteria. All studies examined a group-or classroom-based program to reduce depression. Three studies reported either significant pre-to post-intervention improvements or clinical change in depressive symptoms or coping skills; one study found null effects. While promising, there is an on-going need for additional rigorous investigations on rural high-school based interventions for the treatment of depression and anxiety among teens.
Public Health Significance StatementThis critical review of the literature reveals promising school-based treatments to reduce depression among rural adolescents. At the same time, there is a significant need for more research on school-based interventions for rural youth, especially as it pertains to anxiety disorders.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.