Patients with ulcerative colitis who received the modified two-stage IPAA had a significantly lower rate of anastomotic leak following pouch creation, compared with the traditional two-stage procedure.

Aim Management of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) requires a high degree of patient engagement. This process may be facilitated by online health-related information and education. The aim of this study was to systematically review current online health information on LARS.Method An online search of Google, Yahoo and Bing was performed using the search terms 'low anterior/anterior resection syndrome' and 'bowel function/movements after rectal cancer surgery'. Websites were assessed for readability (eight standardized tests), suitability (using the Suitability Assessment of Materials instrument), quality (the DISCERN instrument), accuracy and content (using a LARS-specific content checklist). Websites were categorized as academic, governmental, nonprofit or private. ResultsOf 117 unique websites, 25 met the inclusion criteria. The median readability level was 10.4 (9.2-11.7) and 11 (44.0%) websites were highly suitable. Using the DISCERN instrument, seven (28.0%) websites had clear aims, two (8.0%) divulged the sources used and four (16.0%) had high overall quality. Only eight (32.0%) websites defined LARS and ten (40.0%) listed all five major symptoms associated with the LARS score. There was variation in the number of websites that discussed dietary modifications (80.0%), self-help strategies (72.0%), medication (68.0%), pelvic floor rehabilitation (60.0%) and neuromodulation (8.0%). The median accuracy of websites was 93.8% (88.2-96.7%). Governmental websites scored highest for overall suitability (P = 0.0079) and quality (P < 0.001).Conclusions Current online information on LARS is suboptimal. Websites are highly variable, important content is often lacking and material is too complex for patients.What does this paper add to the literature? Patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) following surgery for rectal cancer may turn to the Internet for help relating to their bowel function. This study reviews the available online health information on LARS, identifying the highest rated websites and highlighting the gaps in what is currently available to patients.

Preoperative anti-TNF therapy in patients with UC is not associated with an increased risk of infectious and noninfectious complications after IPAA including pelvic abscesses, leaks, and wound infections.

The prognosis of patients with N1c disease is similar to nodal involvement without tumor deposits, yet these patients were less likely to receive adjuvant systemic therapy. Improvement in the delivery of appropriate care in these patients may increase survival and should be a target of future quality initiatives. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A666.

The quality of evidence is limited and does not consistently support the superiority of CME. Better data are needed before CME can be recommended as the standard of care for colon cancer resections.

MIS approaches are associated with less delay to the initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival in patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma. Surgeons should favor MIS approaches for the treatment of stage III colon adenocarcinoma whenever possible.

IPAA has been found to be a safe and effective method of surgical management of UC patients in a high-volume IBD center.

No abstract