ABSTRACT:The focus of this study was to test the fracture resistance of upper arch dental retainers, made by two different manipulation techniques of acrylic resin. 84 plates Wraparound type retainers were made by two different manipulation techniques forming two groups (n = 42): Group 1 (Addition Technique) and Group 2 (Pressing Technique). All the retainers were duly shaped in U form with the aid of standardized plaster cast models. During the confection process the standardizing of the retainers was conducted carefully regarding their thickness and dimensions with the aid of a gauge and a straight caliper. After confection they remained immersed in water for 24 hours at 37°C. Next, they were tested through mechanical compression until fracture in a universal mechanical testing machine. Data were analyzed by Student's t test. The significance level was set at 5% (α = 0.05). It was found that the average was of 79.12 N for Group 1 and of 77.07 N for Group 2 with a standard deviation of 17.30 N and 16.31, respectively, showing that there is no significant difference in resistance for the retainers when made through any of the two methods (P=0.788). The addition and pressure techniques of acrylic resin do not influence the resistance to compression of the upper dental retainers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.