These data indicate that survivals after transplantation for HEH are favorable. Given the propensity for recurrence after resection, these data support consideration of liver transplantation for all patients with significant intrahepatic tumor burden.

Cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with 5-year survival rates<15%. Selected patients present with localized but unresectable disease and are candidates for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate a multi-institutional experience with liver transplantation for this malignancy. Two hundred eighty patients with cholangiocarcinoma treated with OLT from 1987 to 2005 were identified in The United Network for Organ Sharing database. Patient and allograft survivals were calculated and the potential prognostic value of multiple clinicopathologic variables was assessed. At a median follow-up interval of 452 days (range: 0-6,166 days), 1- and 5-year patient survivals were 74 and 38%, respectively, with 49 actual 5-year survivors and 21 actual 10-year survivors. Posttransplant 1- and 5-year allograft survivals were 69 and 36%, respectively. Study variables associated with improved survivals included diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma pre-OLT [5-year overall survival (OS): 68 vs. 20% for patients with incidental diagnoses at the time of OLT, p<0.001] and OLT after 1993 (5-year OS: 45 vs. 30% pre-1994, p<0.01). In contrast, the diagnosis of concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis did not impact survivals (5-year OS: 41 vs. 50% without primary sclerosing cholangitis, p=0.402). Selected cholangiocarcinoma patients treated with OLT experience a survival benefit. Diagnosis of cancer prior to OLT allows for better staging and pre-OLT therapy that may translate into improved outcomes. These data support the continued development of multimodality cholangiocarcinoma treatment protocols that include OLT.

Background We sought to evaluate population-based temporal trends in perioperative management, as well as short- and long-term outcomes associated with the operative management of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Methods Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results–Medicare linked data, we identified 2,121 patients with operatively managed CRLM between 1991 and 2006. Clinicopathologic data, trends in operative management, and survival were examined. Results Preoperative evaluation included computed tomography (CT; 66%), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 5%), and positron emission tomography (PET; 2%) with a temporal increase in the use of all 3 modalities over time (all P < .05). Patients undergoing hepatectomy only (n = 1,267; 60%) decreased over time, whereas the use of ablation alone (n = 668; 32%) and combined resection plus ablation (n = 186; 9%) increased (all P < .05). The use of both preoperative (10% to 16%) and adjuvant chemotherapy (35% to 47%) increased over time (P < .05). There was a marked temporal increase in patient comorbidities (>3 comorbidities: 1991–1995, 3%; 2003–2006, 12%; P < .001); however, perioperative complications (63%) and 30-day mortality (3%) did not change over time (both P > .05); 90-day mortality decreased from 9% to 7% over the study period (P = .007). Overall the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were 74%, 42%, and 28% with no improvement over time (P = .19). On multivariate analysis, synchronous disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7) and use of ablation alone (HR, 1.2) were associated independently with a worse survival (both P < .05). Conclusion Most patients were evaluated with CT; PET was employed rarely. Although there was a temporal increase in chemotherapy utilization, only one half of patients received perioperative chemotherapy. Mortality associated with hepatic operations was low, but morbidity remained high with no temporal change despite an increased number of patient medical comorbidities.

The purpose of our study was to determine how time spent with the physician might be related to patient dissatisfaction with their waiting time. During a 2-month period, patients in our internal medicine resident continuity clinic completed a survey assessing their satisfaction with their waiting time and their estimates of their waiting time and time spent with the resident physician. For patients with long waiting times (more than 15 min in the waiting room or more than 10 min in the exam room), patient dissatisfaction with waiting time was associated with a shorter physician visit (48% were dissatisfied if the physician spent less than 15 min vs. 18% if the physician spent more than 15 min with them, p = .03). These data suggest that physicians can mediate the negative effects of long waiting times by spending more time with their patients. Future studies on patient satisfaction should consider this interaction.

No abstract