The Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) has been active in advocating for the instantiation of best practices in neuroimaging data acquisition, analysis, reporting, and sharing of both data and analysis code, to deal with issues in science related to reproducibility and replicability. Here we summarize recommendations for such practices in magnetoencephalographic (MEG) and electroencephalographic (EEG) research, recently developed by the OHBM neuroimaging community known by the abbreviated name of COBIDAS MEEG. We discuss rationale for the guidelines and their general content, which encompasses many topics under active discussion in the field. We highlight future opportunities and challenges to maximizing the sharing and exploitation of MEG and EEG data, and also how this 'living' set of guidelines will evolve to continually address new developments in neurophysiological assessment methods and multimodal integration of neurophysiological data with other data types.
From the existing literature a set of unrelated clinical characteristics emerged that was associated with a benign course of MS. However, there is a need for prospective studies to define more precisely clinical and paraclinical predictors of benign MS.
Neuroimaging methods, including magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography (MEEG), allow non-invasive collection of neural data in healthy people and in individuals with neurological or psychiatric disorders, with the aim of advancing the understanding of brain function in health and disease. Currently, scientific practice is undergoing a tremendous change, aiming to improve both research reproducibility and transparency in data collection, documentation and analysis, and in manuscript review. To advance the practice of open science, the Organization for Human Brain Mapping originally created the Committee on Best Practice in Data Analysis and Sharing (COBIDAS), which produced a report for MRI-based data. This effort continues with the OHBM's creation of a COBIDAS MEEG committee whose task is to create a similar document that describes best practice recommendations for MEEG data. The document has been drafted by OHBM experts in MEEG, with input from the brain imaging community including OHBM members who volunteered to help with this effort and executive committee members of the International Federation for Clinical Neurophysiology. This document outlines the principles of open and reproducible research in MEEG, and also applies these principles to specific research practices. Not all MEEG data practice is described in this document. Instead, we present information that we believe should be reported to fully understand and potentially replicate any study. We describe both good practice and reporting standards that ensure data collection and analysis will adhere to the highest standards. We also deal with issues of nomenclature and terminology which, due to the relatively long history of MEEG, have come about as different subfields emerged.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.