A full list of authors and affiliations appears at the end of the paper.Purpose: To define the phenotypic and mutational spectrum of epilepsies related to DEPDC5, NPRL2 and NPRL3 genes encoding the GATOR1 complex, a negative regulator of the mTORC1 pathway Methods:We analyzed clinical and genetic data of 73 novel probands (familial and sporadic) with epilepsy-related variants in GATOR1-encoding genes and proposed new guidelines for clinical interpretation of GATOR1 variants.Results: The GATOR1 seizure phenotype consisted mostly in focal seizures (e.g., hypermotor or frontal lobe seizures in 50%), with a mean age at onset of 4.4 years, often sleep-related and drugresistant (54%), and associated with focal cortical dysplasia (20%). Infantile spasms were reported in 10% of the probands. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) occurred in 10% of the families. Novel classification framework of all 140 epilepsy-related GATOR1 variants (including the variants of this study) revealed that 68% are loss-of-function pathogenic, 14% are likely pathogenic, 15% are variants of uncertain significance and 3% are likely benign.Conclusion: Our data emphasize the increasingly important role of GATOR1 genes in the pathogenesis of focal epilepsies (>180 probands to date). The GATOR1 phenotypic spectrum ranges from sporadic early-onset epilepsies with cognitive impairment comorbidities to familial focal epilepsies, and SUDEP.Genetics in Medicine (2018) https://doi

No abstract

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) represents the most severe degree of the spectrum of epilepsy severity and is the commonest cause of epilepsy-related premature mortality. The precise pathophysiology and the genetic architecture of SUDEP remain elusive. Aiming to elucidate the genetic basis of SUDEP, we analysed rare, protein-changing variants from whole-exome sequences of 18 people who died of SUDEP, 87 living people with epilepsy and 1479 non-epilepsy disease controls. Association analysis revealed a significantly increased genome-wide polygenic burden per individual in the SUDEP cohort when compared to epilepsy (P = 5.7 × 10− 3) and non-epilepsy disease controls (P = 1.2 × 10− 3). The polygenic burden was driven both by the number of variants per individual, and over-representation of variants likely to be deleterious in the SUDEP cohort. As determined by this study, more than a thousand genes contribute to the observed polygenic burden within the framework of this study. Subsequent gene-based association analysis revealed five possible candidate genes significantly associated with SUDEP or epilepsy, but no one single gene emerges as common to the SUDEP cases. Our findings provide further evidence for a genetic susceptibility to SUDEP, and suggest an extensive polygenic contribution to SUDEP causation. Thus, an overall increased burden of deleterious variants in a highly polygenic background might be important in rendering a given individual more susceptible to SUDEP. Our findings suggest that exome sequencing in people with epilepsy might eventually contribute to generating SUDEP risk estimates, promoting stratified medicine in epilepsy, with the eventual aim of reducing an individual patient's risk of SUDEP.

Ketogenic diet therapies (KDT) are high-fat, low carbohydrate diets used as an effective treatment option for drug-resistant epilepsy. There is limited research on the efficacy of KDT for super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE). We systematically review evidence for use of KDT in children with SRSE and present a single UK tertiary centre's experience. Thirty one articles were included, of which 24 were “medium” or “low” quality. One hundred and forty seven children with SRSE started KDT, of which 141 (96%) achieved ketosis. KDT was started mean 5.3 days (range 1–420) after status epilepticus (SE) started. SRSE resolved in 85/141 (60%) children after mean 6.3 days (range 0–19) post SE onset, but it is unclear whether further treatments were initiated post-KDT. 13/141 (9%) children died. Response to KDT was more likely when initiated earlier (p = 0.03) and in females (p = 0.01). Adverse side effects were reported in 48/141 (34%), mostly gastrointestinal; potentially serious adverse effects occurred in ≤4%. Eight children with SRSE, all diagnosed with febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome, were treated with KDT at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children. KDT was initiated enterally at mean day 13.6+/− 5.1 of admission. Seven of 8 (88%) children reported adverse side effects, which were potentially serious in 4/8 (50%), including metabolic acidosis, hypoglycaemia and raised amylase. SE ceased in 6/8 (75%) children after mean 25+/− 9.4 days post onset, but other treatments were often started concomitantly and all children started other treatments post-KDT. Two of 8 (25%) children died during admission and another died post-admission. Four of the remaining 5 children continue to have drug-resistant seizures, one of whom remains on KDT; seizure burden was unknown for one child. Our findings indicate that KDT is possible and safe in children with SRSE. Cessation of SRSE may occur in almost two-thirds of children initiated with KDT, but a causal effect is difficult to determine due to concomitant treatments, treatments started post-KDT and the variable length of time post-KDT onset when SRSE cessation occurs. Given that serious adverse side effects seem rare and response rates are (cautiously) favorable, KDT should be considered as an early treatment option in this group.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Many centres across the UK and Ireland anecdotally report using a ‘modified ketogenic diet’ (MKD) as a treatment for refractory epilepsy. Although a MKD is within the spectrum of ketogenic diets (KDs), there is little literature reporting upon its definition, use or clinical effectiveness. We aimed to understand the core principles of MKD practice and to assess whether and how the MKD differs from other KD protocols. Methods An online survey, designed by a consensus group of ketogenic dietitians, was circulated to 39 KD centres across the UK and Ireland. It consisted of 35 questions regarding dietetic practice when providing MKD. Results Eighteen centres completed the questionnaire: 13 paediatric, three adult and two combined centres. All dietitians based MKD ‘prescriptions’ on estimated total energy requirements. The average macronutrient profile was 75% fat and 5% carbohydrate, with protein ad libitum. Carbohydrate and fat targets were implemented via weighed portions (carbohydrate lists n = 18; fat lists n = 13) and ‘household measures’ (carbohydrate lists n = 2; fat lists n = 3). Of the centres, 94% (n = 17) adjusted macronutrients over time; these decisions were based on ketone levels and seizures in most cases (83%; n = 14). Ketogenic nutritional products available on prescription were used by 10 centres (56%) when initiating and by all centres when ‘fine‐tuning’ the MKD. Conclusions A modified ketogenic diet in the UK and Ireland is a hybrid KD, adopting principles from other established KD protocols and defining new elements unique to the MKD. Further research into the clinical and cost‐effectiveness of MKD would be of benefit.