This article focuses on the media system in Austria, with particular interest in the portrayal of asylum seekers and refugees in the print news media. The objective is to define conditions, processes, and content issues in order to determine their roles in the coverage of this topic. As a framework for analysis, the model of three political dimensions, polity, politics and policy, is used. For each dimension, key factors are determined. In the analysis of the systemic framework (polity), the legal aspects for mass media, the level of concentration in the Austrian media sector, and the media self-regulation measures are considered to be essential as they form the basis for media plurality and diversity of opinion in a democratic system. Regarding the processes (politics), various main players are identified. These include policy-makers in the parliament and government and their influence on media enterprises, as well as Austrian non-governmental organizations (NGOs) committed to the rights of refugees and asylum seekers. Journalists are seen as important actors, even if their gatekeeper-function seems to have changed due to new technologies. Thus, an individual citizen can now also use social media channels as a tool of direct participation and as an agenda-setting opportunity. Concerning the content issues (policy), the descriptive model of news values is considered essential for mass media coverage. A qualitative analysis of online articles in two daily newspapers, Kronen Zeitung and Der Standard, compares the tonality of the discourse in a range of articles and shows differences of the reporting styles in tabloid and quality media. Furthermore, there will be a comparison of online articles in derstandard.at of different time periods, analysing changes in the Austrian media coverage during and after the ‘welcome culture’ with regard to refugees/asylum seekers.
One big achievement in the last decade is the rapid development in transplantation medicine, enabling seriously ill people to live longer. However, in the year 2014, 12 people in the European Union have died every day because of the lack of available organs. Nearly, 70,000 people were waiting for a matching graft. An analysis of donation and transplantation variation across the European member states shows that since many years, Spain occupies a pioneer role, whereas Germany and Austria are lagging behind. From the legal and administrative perspective, Spain and Austria are quite similar with their presumed consent system (opting out), whereas Germany has an informed consent system (opting in). Hence, there must be other influencing factors like the way of multilevel communication leading to the following research question: How does multilevel communication influence organ donations in Spain, Germany, and Austria? On the basis of a cross-country study, it can be shown that strategic communication on the (inter)personal and organizational level supported by the creation of public awareness on the national level is crucial for succeeding in closing the gap between demands and realized organ transplantation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.