No abstract
No abstract
From December 2019 to March 2021, the Commission on Orthography at the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts and the Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts published four chapters proposed to be included in the new normative rules. The proposals were published on the Fran website in a format suitable for public discussion: Written symbols (December 2019), Abbreviations (December 2019), Capitalization (March 2021), Loanwords and loan phrases (March 2021). The presentation of the new normative chapters is supplemented by commentaries, explaining and justifying the considerations and decisions of the Commission on Orthography. The publication of all comments on the already published chapters of the Pravopis 8.0 is the result of frequently expressed desires: that all commentaries be accessible to the user and that it be possible to refer to the explanations of chapter authors, i.e. the members of the Commission on Orthography at the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts and the Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, when writing these rules, which is typical for scientific publications. The comments were written as justifications for the rules presented; they are primarily intended to provide explanations for those areas where the decision is not yet final and where the Commission expects new arguments to emerge in the public discussion. These arguments are intended to contribute to a more consensual decision regarding areas that have been left out or completely ignored by the language community for an extended period of time.
Since 3 December 2019, the Commission on Orthography at the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts and the Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts has been publishing updated or redesigned chapters of the normative rules, which are published as one of the collections on the Fran website. In the first part of the publication, the first two chapters of the normative rules are published. The chapters titled “Written symbols” and “Abbreviations” were released for public discussion in December 2019. In comparison to Slovenski pravopis 2001, the chapter “Written symbols” was expanded, i.e. information was added about the problem areas language users encounter when dealing with non-letter written symbols, or letters that are not part of the Slovenian alphabet, or letters that play a special role in a text (e. g., as signs or symbols). Later, when borrowing directions for foreign languages were created to further reform the rules, it turned out that the chapter on written symbols still needed to be amended. The second chapter of the normative rules is completely new; previous normative guides did not require such a detailed description of this problem area: abbreviations occurred occasionally; the codification of symbols was defined by professionals of the field in which the symbols appeared in various roles; abbreviations were considered to be indeclinable nouns or units that gradually disappear from usage and become normal words in terms of the way they are written and spoken. In an effort to ensure a transparent process of reforming the rules, comments were collected from the public discussion. These comments were received in December 2019 through online forms or from various participants of the discussion, either individually or as a group (comments from proofreading groups or from members of media company teams).
Simon Atelšek (čebelarstvo), Dejan Bordjan (zoologija), Nina Ditmajer (literarna veda), Klemen Grabnar (muzikologija), Matjaž Gregorič (zoologija), Vladimir Habjan (planinstvo), Antonija Holcman (živinoreja), Aleksander Horvat (geologija), Vesna Huber (plesna umetnost), Metka Hudina (agronomija), Kristjan Jarni (botanika), Slavko Jerič (šport), Marko Juvan (literarna veda), Gorazd Karer (elektrotehnika), Tomaž Katrašnik (strojništvo), Katarina Keber (zgodovina), Blaž Komac (geografija), Mojca Kovač Šebart (pedagogika), Monika Kropej Telban (etnologija), Erna Krošelj (grafično oblikovanje), Radovan Kumar (enologija), Jože Kutin (strojništvo), Vasja Leban (gozdarstvo), Igor Lengar (fizika), Simon Malmenvall (teologija), Lucija Mandić (literarna veda), Ljubica Marjanovič Umek (psihologija), Matej Michelizza (računalništvo in informatika), Matevž Mihelič (gozdarstvo), Ana Motnikar (tekstilstvo), Boštjan Napotnik (gastronomija), Aleš Novak (pravo), Aleš Obreza (farmacija), Franc Perdih (kemija), Katarina Podbevšek (gledališka umetnost), Tomo Podstenšek (literarna veda), Anton Poje (gozdarstvo), Miha Preinfalk (zgodovina), Nataša Rogelja Caf (ribištvo), Helena Seražin (umetnostna zgodovina), Mojca Simčič (živinoreja), Igor Smolej (gozdarstvo), Aleš Smrekar (geografija), Janez Snoj (avtomobilizem), Dušica Šibav (enologija), Danilo Škulj (gozdarstvo), Urša Šmid Božičević (ekonomija), Katarina Šter (muzikologija), Blaž Torkar (vojska), Franc Verovnik (medicina), Damjan Vrenčur (matematika), Branko Vreš (biologija), Janja Žagar (etnologija), Silvester Žgur (živinoreja) ▪ Ah, ali sem te tako učila? ▪ Ah, moški, moški, pravi mati v svoje lonce na štedilniku. izraža, da govorec želi ublažiti pomen izrečenega▪ Ah, porečete, še ena novotarija z druge strani luže. ▪ Ah, to ni bil hud spor, le izmenjava različnih misli. izraža, da govorec občuti umirjeno veselje, radost▪ Ah, kako sem vesel, da te spet vidim! ▪ Ah, kakšna radost! Ukvarjati se z umetnostjo! 3.1. izraža, da govorec občuti vznesenost ▪ Romi so peli srbske pesmi, orientalska čutnost in slovanska žalost, ah, slovanska duša! ▪ Pred hiško terasa z ležalniki, do plaže pa le nekaj korakov po mehkem belem pesku. Ah, tropski raj! izraža, da govorec občuti nostalgijo▪ Ah, kako je sijalo sonce, kako so cvetele moje rože! Dolgo je že od tega. ▪ Ah, kje so tisti časi ... 3.3.izraža, da govorec občuti hrepenenje po tem, kar je vsebina naslednjega stavka ▪ Zadnje tedne marca smo pogosto pomislili: ah, ko bi sedaj končno posijalo pomladansko sonce! ▪ Ah, ko bi še mene tako čakal, medtem ko bi zapravljala po trgovinah! 4. izraža, da se govorec nenadoma česa domisli, spozna kaj ▪ »Ah, na to pa nisem mislila,« pravi smeje se.12 ▪ Ah, skoraj sem pozabila, da so te dali v moj razred. 5.kot členek uporablja se, ko govorec poudarja svojo izjavo ▪ Ah, prosim, pustite naju noter. Nikomur ne bova v nadlego. ▪ Ah, ne da se mi več razlagati. ▪ Ah, dajte no, saj znam brati. 5.1. kot členek uporablja se, ko govorec poudarja svoje pritrjevanje ali zanikovanje ▪ Strinjal se je z mano: »Ah da. Prav...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.