Aims The EURO-ENDO registry aimed to study the management and outcomes of patients with infective endocarditis (IE). Methods and results Prospective cohort of 3116 adult patients (2470 from Europe, 646 from non-ESC countries), admitted to 156 hospitals in 40 countries between January 2016 and March 2018 with a diagnosis of IE based on ESC 2015 diagnostic criteria. Clinical, biological, microbiological, and imaging [echocardiography, computed tomography (CT) scan, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT)] data were collected. Infective endocarditis was native (NVE) in 1764 (56.6%) patients, prosthetic (PVIE) in 939 (30.1%), and device-related (CDRIE) in 308 (9.9%). Infective endocarditis was community-acquired in 2046 (65.66%) patients. Microorganisms involved were staphylococci in 1085 (44.1%) patients, oral streptococci in 304 (12.3%), enterococci in 390 (15.8%), and Streptococcus gallolyticus in 162 (6.6%). 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed in 518 (16.6%) patients and presented with cardiac uptake (major criterion) in 222 (42.9%) patients, with a better sensitivity in PVIE (66.8%) than in NVE (28.0%) and CDRIE (16.3%). Embolic events occurred in 20.6% of patients, and were significantly associated with tricuspid or pulmonary IE, presence of a vegetation and Staphylococcus aureus IE. According to ESC guidelines, cardiac surgery was indicated in 2160 (69.3%) patients, but finally performed in only 1596 (73.9%) of them. In-hospital death occurred in 532 (17.1%) patients and was more frequent in PVIE. Independent predictors of mortality were Charlson index, creatinine > 2 mg/dL, congestive heart failure, vegetation length > 10 mm, cerebral complications, abscess, and failure to undertake surgery when indicated. Conclusion Infective endocarditis is still a life-threatening disease with frequent lethal outcome despite profound changes in its clinical, microbiological, imaging, and therapeutic profiles.

Purpose High mortality and a limited performance of valvular surgery are typical features of infective endocarditis (IE) in octogenarians, even though surgical treatment is a major determinant of a successful outcome in IE. Methods Data from the prospective multicentre ESC EORP EURO-ENDO registry were used to assess the prognostic role of valvular surgery depending on age. Results As compared to < 80 yo patients, ≥ 80 yo had lower rates of theoretical indication for valvular surgery (49.1% vs. 60.3%, p < 0.001), of surgery performed (37.0% vs. 75.5%, p < 0.001), and a higher in-hospital (25.9% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.001) and 1-year mortality (41.3% vs. 22.2%, p < 0.001). By multivariable analysis, age per se was not predictive of 1-year mortality, but lack of surgical procedures when indicated was strongly predictive ). By propensity analysis, 304 ≥ 80 yo were matched to 608 < 80 yo patients. Propensity analysis confirmed the lower rate of indication for valvular surgery (51.3% vs. 57.2%, p = 0.031) and of surgery performed (35.3% vs. 68.4%, p < 0.0001) in ≥ 80 yo. Overall mortality remained higher in ≥ 80 yo (in-hospital: HR 1.50[1.06-2.13], p = 0.0210; 1-yr: HR 1.58[1.21-2.05], p = 0.0006), but was not different from that of < 80 yo among those who had surgery (in-hospital: 19.7% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.4236; 1-year: 27.3% vs. 25.5%, p = 0.7176). Conclusion Although mortality rates are consistently higher in ≥ 80 yo patients than in < 80 yo patients in the general population, mortality of surgery in ≥ 80 yo is similar to < 80 yo after matching patients. These results confirm the importance of a better recognition of surgical indication and of an increased performance of surgery in ≥ 80 yo patients.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has transformed health systems worldwide. There is conflicting data regarding the degree of cardiovascular involvement following infection. A registry was designed to evaluate the prevalence of echocardiographic abnormalities in adults recovered from COVID-19. We prospectively evaluated 595 participants (mean age 45.5 ± 14.9 years; 50.8% female) from 10 institutions in Argentina and Brazil. Median time between infection and evaluation was two months, and 82.5% of participants were not hospitalized for their infection. Echocardiographic studies were conducted with General Electric equipment; 2DE imaging and global longitudinal strain (GLS) of both ventricles were performed. A total of 61.7% of the participants denied relevant cardiovascular history and 41.8% had prolonged symptoms after resolution of COVID-19 infection. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 61.0 ± 5.5% overall. In patients without prior comorbidities, 8.2% had some echocardiographic abnormality: 5.7% had reduced GLS, 3.0% had a LVEF below normal range, and 1.1% had wall motion abnormalities. The right ventricle (RV) was dilated in 1.6% of participants, 3.1% had a reduced GLS, and 0.27% had reduced RV function. Mild pericardial effusion was observed in 0.82% of participants. Male patients were more likely to have new echocardiographic abnormalities (OR 2.82, p = 0.002). Time elapsed since infection resolution (p = 0.245), presence of symptoms (p = 0.927), or history of hospitalization during infection (p = 0.671) did not have any correlation with echocardiographic abnormalities. Cardiovascular abnormalities after COVID-19 infection are rare and usually mild, especially following mild infection, being a low GLS of left and right ventricle, the most common ones in our registry. Post COVID cardiac abnormalities may be more frequent among males. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-022-02706-9.

Introducción: El eco estrés evidencia la isquemia miocárdica como un trastorno regional y transitorio de la motilidad. El análisis visual es subjetivo y depende de la experiencia del operador, lo que ha motivado la búsqueda de un método semiautomático que permita minimizar esta limitación y así mejorar la confiabilidad y reproducibilidad de la prueba. Esto ha generado creciente interés en la introducción de la medición del strain longitudinal bidimensional antes del eco estrés y durante y después de él. Su determinación en las diferentes fases de apremio, en caso de que sea útil, permitiría reducir otras limitaciones, como la imposibilidad de alcanzar la frecuencia cardíaca submáxima, la dificultad de visualizar trastornos muy sutiles y el retraso en la adquisición de las imágenes, lo que incrementa los falsos negativos. Objetivos: Evaluar si el análisis del strain longitudinal realizado en reposo, cuando no hay evidencias de trastornos contráctiles visuales, es capaz de predecir el resultado del eco estrés y si el strain longitudinal basal es diferente en los pacientes con enfermedad coronaria significativa en comparación con los que no la presentan (en su evaluación previa al comienzo de la prueba). Material y métodos: Se compararon los resultados del strain longitudinal en reposo en 62 pacientes con eco estrés positivo incorporados en forma consecutiva en un período de 12 meses, a la mitad de los cuales se les realizó una cinecoronariografía (Grupo A) y a la otra mitad no se le efectuó este estudio (Grupo B) versus un grupo control (Grupo C) con prueba negativa y sin cinecoronariografía. Resultados: El strain longitudinal entre el Grupo A y el Grupo B no mostró diferencia estadística significativa (-21,8% ± 2,4% vs. -21,5% ± 2,5%), como tampoco el de los pacientes con prueba positiva (Grupo A + B) versus los controles (-21,67% ± 2,4% vs. 21,9% ± 2,8%). Conclusión: El strain longitudinal bidimensional no permitió predecir el resultado del eco estrés ni tampoco la presencia de enfermedad coronaria significativa en los pacientes que fueron sometidos a cinecoronariografía invasiva.

Background The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has transformed health systems worldwide. There is conflicting data regarding the degree of cardiovascular involvement following infection, generating uncertainty in patients and an additional healthcare burden with increased diagnostic testing. A registry was designed to evaluate the prevalence of echocardiographic abnormalities in Latin American adults recovered from COVID-19. Methods We prospectively evaluated 595 participants (mean age 45.5±14.9 years; 50.8% female) from 10 institutions in Argentina and Brazil. Echocardiographic studies were conducted with General Electric equipment; 2DE imaging and global longitudinal strain (GLS) of both ventricles were performed. Comparisons between groups were made with Chi-square, Fisher and Student's t-test. Logistic regression was performed to determine variables associated with abnormal echocardiogram findings. Results A total of 61.7% of the participants denied any relevant cardiovascular medical history. Table 1 summarizes the comorbidities of the included patients. The majority of patients (82.5%) had the disease at home or in an out-of-hospital center. Of the patients who required hospitalization, 15.3% were in a general ward, 1.9% in intensive care and 0.3% required mechanical ventilation during the disease. The median time between infection and performance of the echocardiographic study was two months (IQR 1–3 months). Among patients who reported symptoms following COVID-19 recovery (41.8%), the most frequently reported was dyspnea (47.4%), followed by mild symptoms such as asthenia, arterial hypertension or palpitations (32.9%), 12.9% referred chest pain, 6% of patients reported dyspnea and chest pain, and 0.8% reported various other symptoms. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 61.0±5.5% and the mean left atrial volume was 33.1±13.2 ml/m2. In patients without prior comorbidities, 8.2% had some echocardiographic abnormality (Figure 1). We found no significant differences in LVEF between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (61.4% versus 60.6% respectively, p=0.104). Symptomatic patients showed slightly reduced GLS (−20.3% versus −20.9%, p=0.012) with a trend in the same direction in the RV free wall GLS (−25.6% versus −26.3%, p=0.103). Male patients were more likely to have any new echocardiographic abnormalities (OR 2.82, p=0.002). Time elapsed since infection resolution (p=0.245), the presence of symptoms (p=0.927), or history of hospitalization during infection (p=0.671) did not have any correlation with echocardiographic abnormalities. The difference between sexes remains unchanged after adjusting for left atrial volume, wall thicknesses, diastolic function and abnormal wall motion. Conclusion Our results suggest that cardiovascular abnormalities after COVID-19 infection are rare and usually mild, especially in cases of mild disease. These abnormalities may be more frequent among males Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.