In groundwater hydrology, the characterization of the distribution of groundwater flow within the critical zone received considerable attention in the last decades (Freeze & Cherry, 1979). Our ability to quantify groundwater flow greatly controls our ability to characterize aquifers, predict contaminant transport, and understand biogeochemical reactions and processes occurring in the subsurface (Kalbus et al., 2009; Poeter & Gaylord, 1990). Groundwater flow at interfaces such as recharge and discharge areas also plays a key role in the preservation of groundwater-dependent ecosystems (Kalbus et al., 2006; Sophocleous, 2002). The quantification of groundwater fluxes is also particularly relevant for geothermal energy since they control heat exchange and storage capacities (Diao et al., 2004). Similarly, the characterization of seepage through dams, dikes, and reservoirs is also critical for geotechnical engineering (Foster et al., 2000). The spatial distribution of groundwater fluxes is largely driven by subsurface heterogeneities. Thus, in past decades, the characterization of the distribution of groundwater fluxes and their quantification relied on the capacity of characterizing and modeling the spatial variability of hydraulic conductivities (de Marsily, 1976). Considering the challenge in characterizing the field variability of hydraulic properties, the use of heat as a tracer has been widely developed and applied to characterize flow in aquifers or at interfaces such as the hyporheic zone (
Thermal response tests are used to assess the subsurface thermal conductivity to design ground-coupled heat pump systems. Conventional tests are cumbersome and require a source of high power to heat water circulating in a pilot ground heat exchanger. An alternative test method using heating cable was verified in the field as an option to conduct this heat injection experiment with a low power source and a compact equipment. Two thermal response tests using heating cable sections and a continuous heating cable were performed in two experimental heat exchangers on different sites in Canada and France. The temperature evolution during the tests was monitored using submersible sensors and fiber optic distributed temperature sensing. Free convection that can occur in the pipe of the heat exchanger was evaluated using the Rayleigh number stability criterion. The finite and infinite line source equations were used to reproduce temperature variations along the heating cable sections and continuous heating cable, respectively. The thermal conductivity profile of each site was inferred and the uncertainly of the test was evaluated. A mean thermal conductivity 15% higher than that revealed with the conventional test was estimated with heating cable sections. The thermal conductivity evaluated using the continuous heating cable corresponds to the value estimated during the conventional test. The average uncertainly associated with the heating cable section test was 15.18%, while an uncertainty of 2.14% was estimated for the test with the continuous heating cable. According to the Rayleigh number stability criterion, significant free convection can occur during the heat injection period when heating cable sections are used. The continuous heating cable with a low power source is a promising method to perform thermal response tests and further tests could be carried out in deep boreholes to verify its applicability.
For many environmental applications, the interpretation of fiber-optic Raman distributed temperature sensing (FO-DTS) measurements is strongly dependent on the spatial resolution of measurements, especially when the objective is to detect temperature variations over small scales. Here, we propose to compare three different and complementary methods to estimate, in practice, the “effective” spatial resolution of DTS measurements: The classical “90% step change” method, the correlation length estimated from experimental semivariograms, and the derivative method. The three methods were applied using FO-DTS measurements achieved during sandbox experiments using two DTS units having different spatial resolutions. Results show that the value of the spatial resolution estimated using a step change depends on both the effective spatial resolution of the DTS unit and on heat conduction induced by the high thermal conductivity of the cable. The correlation length method provides an estimate much closer to the value provided by the manufacturers, representative of the effective spatial resolutions along cable sections where temperature gradients are small or negligible. Thirdly, the application of the derivative method allows for verifying the representativeness of DTS measurements all along the cable, by localizing sections where measurements are representative of the effective temperature. We finally show that DTS measurements could be validated in sandbox experiments, when using devices with finer spatial resolution.
Abstract. Exchanges between groundwater and surface water play a key role for ecosystem preservation, especially in headwater catchments where groundwater discharge into streams highly contributes to streamflow generation and maintenance. Despite several decades of research, investigating the spatial variability in groundwater discharge into streams still remains challenging mainly because groundwater/surface water interactions are controlled by multi-scale processes. In this context, we evaluated the potential of using FO-DTS (fibre optic distributed temperature sensing) technology to locate and quantify groundwater discharge at a high resolution. To do so, we propose to combine, for the first time, long-term passive DTS measurements and active DTS measurements by deploying FO cables in the streambed sediments of a first- and second-order stream in gaining conditions. The passive DTS experiment provided 8 months of monitoring of streambed temperature fluctuations along more than 530 m of cable, while the active DTS experiment, performed during a few days, allowed a detailed and accurate investigation of groundwater discharge variability over a 60 m length heated section. Long-term passive DTS measurements turn out to be an efficient method to detect and locate groundwater discharge along several hundreds of metres. The continuous 8 months of monitoring allowed the highlighting of changes in the groundwater discharge dynamic in response to the hydrological dynamic of the headwater catchment. However, the quantification of fluxes with this approach remains limited given the high uncertainties on estimates, due to uncertainties on thermal properties and boundary conditions. On the contrary, active DTS measurements, which have seldom been performed in streambed sediments and never applied to quantify water fluxes, allow for the estimation of the spatial distribution of both thermal conductivities and the groundwater fluxes at high resolution all along the 60 m heated section of the FO cable. The method allows for the description of the variability in streambed properties at an unprecedented scale and reveals the variability in groundwater inflows at small scales. In the end, this study shows the potential and the interest of the complementary use of passive and active DTS experiments to quantify groundwater discharge at different spatial and temporal scales. Thus, results show that groundwater discharges are mainly concentrated in the upstream part of the watershed, where steepest slopes are observed, confirming the importance of the topography in the stream generation in headwater catchments. However, through the high spatial resolution of measurements, it was also possible to highlight the presence of local and highly contributive groundwater inflows, probably driven by local heterogeneities. The possibility to quantify groundwater discharge at a high spatial resolution through active DTS offers promising perspectives for the characterization of distributed responses times but also for studying biogeochemical hotspots and hot moments.
Active distributed temperature sensing (ADTS) experiments are very useful to provide in-situ and distributed estimates of thermal conductivities of the subsurface and of groundwater flows. However, the data interpretation can be seen as difficult considering the large amount of data collected along a heated fiber-optic cable and the lack of associated tools for their automated analysis. In this context, we developed an automated routine program for the interpretation of ADTS measurements: the ADTS Toolbox. It contains several codes written in MATLAB that calculate, for each measurement point located along a heated section, both the thermal conductivity of the surrounding material and the groundwater flux. In addition, it provides uncertainties on the estimated thermal conductivities and fluxes according to the temperature resolution (noise) or to errors on temperature measurements. By offering the possibility of automatically interpreting ADTS measurements, the ADTS Toolbox facilitates the use and interpretation of ADTS experiments for characterizing at high resolution the groundwater flows distribution and for imaging the thermal conductivities variability.
No abstract
Abstract. FO-DTS (Fiber Optic Distributed Temperature Sensing) technology has been widely developed to quantify exchanges between groundwater and surface water during the last decade. In this study, we propose, for the first time, to combine long-term passive-DTS measurements and active-DTS measurements in order to highlight their respective potential to locate and quantify groundwater discharge into streams. On the one hand, passive-DTS measurements consist in monitoring natural temperature fluctuations to detect and localize groundwater inflows and characterize the temporal pattern of exchanges. Although easy to set up, the quantification of fluxes with this approach often remains difficult since it relies on energy balance models or on the coupling of distributed temperature measurements with additional punctual measurements. On the other hand, active-DTS methods, recently developed in hydrogeology, consist in continuously monitoring temperature changes induced by a heat source along a FO cable. Recent developments showed that this approach, although more complex to set up than passive-DTS measurements, can address the challenge of quantifying groundwater fluxes and their spatial distribution. Yet it has almost never been conducted in streambed sediments. In this study, both methods are combined by deploying FO cables in the streambed sediments of a first- and second-order stream within a small agricultural watershed. A numerical model is used to interpret passive-DTS measurements and highlight the temporal and spatial dynamic of groundwater discharge over the annual hydrological cycle. We underline the difficulties and the limitations of deploying a single FO cable to investigate groundwater discharge and show the impact of uncertainty on sediments thermal properties on the quantification of groundwater inflows. On the opposite, the active-DTS experiment allows estimating the spatial distribution of both the thermal conductivity and the groundwater flux at high resolution with very low uncertainties all along the heated section of FO cable. Our results highlight the added values of conducting active-DTS experiments, eventually combined with passive-DTS measurements, to fully investigate and characterize patterns of groundwater-stream water exchanges at the stream scale. The combination of both methods allows discussing the impact of topography and hydraulic conductivity variations on the variability of groundwater inflows in headwater catchments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.