ObjectiveTelemedicine is rapidly becoming a major vehicle of delivering neurologic care to patients who have limited access to subspecialists and exaggerated travel hardship. However, neurology residents receive little to no training in telemedicine in outpatient clinics.MethodsWe piloted, to our knowledge, the first formalized, experiential outpatient teleneurology curriculum. Neurology residents in their third and fourth postgraduate years (PGY3 and PGY4) at the University of California San Francisco completed an interactive lecture and 4 weeks of teleneurology clinics at the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Change in residents' telemedicine knowledge and perspectives on the utility, challenges, benefits, and future practice implementation of teleneurology were evaluated in 11 residents using precurriculum and postcurriculum quizzes and surveys after 2 of 4 weeks on the rotation.ResultsResidents' performance on quizzes improved from 53% to 88% (p = 0.002). Residents' impression of video visits compared to in-person visits changed, with more individuals indicating video visits to be the same if not somewhat superior with regards to obtaining a focused history, formulating a focused assessment and plan, communicating recommendations, and the overall care provided (p ≤ 0.04). All residents felt more competent using telemedicine for patient care in their eventual career.ConclusionOur formal didactic and clinic-based teleneurology curriculum for neurology residents, which shared core themes suggested by the 2017 American Academy of Neurology Telemedicine Work Group's published recommendations, showed a statistically significant improvement in knowledge and perspectives about the promise and limitations of teleneurology practice, as well as increased comfort levels in future implementation.
ObjectiveTo determine whether initial presurgical evaluation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) candidacy with video telemedicine (VTEL) can reliably predict surgical candidacy (patients who will eventually undergo DBS surgery) and decrease resource utilization when compared to an in-person evaluation.MethodsIn this retrospective, cohort analysis, all out-of-state referrals to the San Francisco Veterans Affairs from 2008 to 2013 for DBS therapy were reviewed and their surgical outcomes were assessed until 2017. Patients were designated as good, borderline, or poor surgical candidates after initial evaluation, and their rates of undergoing DBS were recorded. An assessment of patient travel costs was performed.ResultsThere were 60 out-of-state DBS referrals identified out of the 148 initial presurgical DBS evaluations completed for surgical treatment of dystonia, essential tremor, or Parkinson disease; 24 patients underwent in-person consultation and 36 patients underwent evaluation via VTEL. There was no difference between the rates of undergoing surgical treatment with DBS based on surgical candidacy for patients in the in-person and VTEL cohorts. Patients who underwent initial presurgical screening via VTEL saved time and money.ConclusionsVTEL can be used to facilitate presurgical screening for DBS and saves costs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.