Implicit bias has garnered considerable public attention, with a number of behaviors (e.g., police shootings) attributed to it. Here, we present the results of 4 studies and an internal meta-analysis that examine how people reason about discrimination based on whether it was attributed to the implicit or explicit attitudes of the perpetrators. Participants’ perceptions of perpetrator accountability, support for punishment, level of concern about the bias, and support for various efforts to reduce it (e.g., education) were assessed. Taken together, the results suggest that perpetrators of discrimination are held less accountable and often seen as less worthy of punishment when their behavior is attributed to implicit rather than to explicit bias. Moreover, at least under some circumstances, people express less concern about, and are less likely to support efforts to combat, implicit compared with explicit bias. Implications for efforts to communicate the science of implicit bias without undermining accountability for the discrimination it engenders are discussed.

Racial economic inequality is a foundational feature of the United States, yet many Americans appear oblivious to it. The present work considers the psychology underlying this collective willful ignorance. Drawing on prior research and new evidence from a nationally representative sample of adults (N = 1,008), we offer compelling evidence that Americans vastly underestimate racial economic inequality, especially the racial wealth gap. In particular, respondents thought that the Black-White wealth gap was smaller, by around 40 percentage points in 1963 and around 80 percentage points in 2016, than its actual size. We then consider the motivational, cognitive, and structural factors that are likely to contribute to these misperceptions and suggest directions for future research to test these ideas. Importantly, we highlight the implications of our collective ignorance of racial economic inequality, the challenge of creating greater accuracy in perceptions of these racial economic disparities, as well as outline the steps policymakers might take to create messages on this topic that effectively promote equity-enhancing policies. We close with an appeal to psychological science to at least consider, if not center, the racial patterning of these profound economic gaps.

Background: Telemedicine programs for the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) offer an opportunity to reduce burdens on patients and providers. However, these programs are typically restricted to patients with uncomplicated UTIs. This real-world analysis evaluated treatment and resolution rates in a large-scale, national UTI telemedicine program inclusive of patients with uncomplicated and complicated UTIs. Methods and findings: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data obtained from a commercially available telemedicine program for the treatment of UTIs among adult women in the US between 2017 and 2021 (n=51,474). The primary outcomes were the number of women who presented with symptoms of uncomplicated UTI, complicated UTI, and vaginal infection; prescription use and antibiotic type; symptom resolution within 7 days after appointment; and treatment failure or relapse. Most patients reported frequent urination (94.4%), urgency (94.5%), and dysuria (97.6%). Those with uncomplicated UTI symptoms represented the majority of patients (61.6%); however, a substantial number of patients (36.5%) also reported at least 1 symptom associated with a complicated UTI. One-fifth of patients (19.2%) reported at least 1 co-occurring symptom of vaginal infection or sexually transmitted infection. Across all treated patients, 94.0% received recommended antibiotics according to the clinical protocol. Of the treated patients who provided follow-up data (n=3,521), 89.7% reported 7-day symptom resolution. Symptom resolution rates were similar between patients with uncomplicated UTI symptoms (90.8%) and complicated UTI symptoms (87.9%), and symptom resolution among all treated patients (89.7%) was similar to reports for in-person standard of care. Conclusions: These findings suggest that large-scale telemedicine programs for the treatment of UTIs can be effective in the treatment of complicated UTIs.

Telemedicine programs for the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) offer an opportunity to reduce burdens on patients and providers. However, these programs are typically restricted to patients with uncomplicated UTIs. This real-world analysis evaluated treatment and resolution rates in a large-scale, national UTI telemedicine program inclusive of patients with uncomplicated and complicated UTIs. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data obtained from a commercially available telemedicine program for the treatment of UTIs among adult women in the US between 2017 and 2021 (n = 51,474). The primary outcomes were the number of women who presented with symptoms of uncomplicated UTI, complicated UTI, and vaginal infection; prescription use and antibiotic type; symptom resolution within seven days after appointment; and treatment failure or relapse. Most patients reported frequent urination (94.4%), urgency (94.5%), and dysuria (97.6%). Those with uncomplicated UTI symptoms represented the majority of patients (61.6%); however, a substantial number of patients (36.5%) also reported at least one symptom associated with a complicated UTI. One-fifth of patients (19.2%) reported at least one co-occurring symptom of vaginal infection or sexually transmitted infection. Across all treated patients, 94.0% received recommended antibiotics according to the clinical protocol. Of the treated patients who provided follow-up data (n = 3,521), 89.7% reported seven-day symptom resolution. Symptom resolution rates were similar between patients with uncomplicated UTI symptoms (90.8%) and complicated UTI symptoms (87.9%), and symptom resolution among all treated patients (89.7%) was similar to reports for in-person standard of care. These findings suggest that large-scale telemedicine programs for the treatment of UTIs can be effective in the treatment of complicated UTIs.