No abstract

Cell-to-cell variability generates subpopulations of drug-tolerant cells that diminish the efficacy of cancer drugs. Efficacious combination therapies are thus needed to block drug-tolerant cells via minimizing the impact of heterogeneity. Probabilistic models such as Bliss independence are developed to evaluate drug interactions and their combination efficacy based on probabilities of specific actions mediated by drugs individually and in combination. In practice, however, these models are often applied to conventional dose-response curves in which a normalized parameter with a value between zero and one, generally referred to as fraction of cells affected (fa), is used to evaluate the efficacy of drugs and their combined interactions. We use basic probability theory, computer simulations, time-lapse live cell microscopy, and single-cell analysis to show that fa metrics may bias our assessment of drug efficacy and combination effectiveness. This bias may be corrected when dynamic probabilities of drug-induced phenotypic events, i.e. induction of cell death and inhibition of division, at a single-cell level are used as metrics to assess drug efficacy. Probabilistic phenotype metrics offer the following three benefits. First, in contrast to the commonly used fa metrics, they directly represent probabilities of drug action in a cell population. Therefore, they deconvolve differential degrees of drug effect on tumor cell killing versus inhibition of cell division, which may not be correlated for many drugs. Second, they increase the sensitivity of short-term drug response assays to cell-to-cell heterogeneities and the presence of drugtolerant subpopulations. Third, their probabilistic nature allows them to be used directly in unbiased evaluation of synergistic efficacy in drug combinations using probabilistic models such as Bliss independence. Altogether, we envision that probabilistic analysis of single-cell phenotypes complements currently available assays via improving our understanding of heterogeneity in drug response, thereby facilitating the discovery of more efficacious combination therapies to block drug-tolerant cells. Author SummaryResistance to therapy due to tumor cell heterogeneity poses a major challenge to the use of cancer drugs.Cell-to-cell variability generates subpopulations of drug-tolerant cells that diminish therapeutic efficacy, even in populations of cells scored as highly sensitive based on drug potency. Overcoming such heterogeneity and blocking subpopulations of drug-tolerant cells motivate efforts toward identifying efficacious combination therapies. The success of these efforts depends on our ability to distinguish how heterogeneous populations of cells respond to individual drugs, and how these responses are influenced by combined drug interactions. In this paper, we propose mathematical and experimental frameworks to evaluate time-dependent drug interactions based on probabilistic metrics that quantify drug-induced tumor cell killing or inhibition of division at a single-cell level. T...

Cell-to-cell variability generates subpopulations of drug-tolerant cells that diminish the efficacy of cancer drugs. Efficacious combination therapies are thus needed to block drug-tolerant cells via minimizing the impact of heterogeneity. Probabilistic models such as Bliss independence have been developed to evaluate drug interactions and their combination efficacy based on probabilities of specific actions mediated by drugs individually and in combination. In practice, however, these models are often applied to conventional dose-response curves in which a normalized parameter with a value between zero and one, generally referred to as fraction of cells affected (f a ), is used to evaluate the efficacy of drugs and their combined interactions. We use basic probability theory, computer simulations, time-lapse live cell microscopy, and single-cell analysis to show that f a metrics may bias our assessment of drug efficacy and combination effectiveness. This bias may be corrected when dynamic probabilities of drug-induced phenotypic events, i.e. induction of cell death and inhibition of division, at a single-cell level are used as metrics to assess drug efficacy. Probabilistic phenotype metrics offer the following three benefits. First, in contrast to the commonly used f a metrics, they directly represent probabilities of drug action in a cell population. Therefore, they deconvolve differential degrees of drug effect on tumor cell killing versus inhibition of cell division, which may not be correlated for many drugs. Second, they increase the sensitivity of short-term drug response assays to cell-to-cell heterogeneities and the presence of drug-tolerant subpopulations. Third, their probabilistic nature allows them to be used directly in unbiased evaluation of synergistic efficacy in drug combinations using probabilistic models such as Bliss independence. Altogether, we envision that probabilistic analysis of single-cell phenotypes complements currently available assays via improving our understanding of heterogeneity in drug response, thereby facilitating the discovery of more efficacious combination therapies to block drug-tolerant cells. PLOS Computational Biology | https://doi.Citation: Comandante-Lou N, Khaliq M, Venkat D, Manikkam M, Fallahi-Sichani M (2020) Phenotypebased probabilistic analysis of heterogeneous responses to cancer drugs and their combination efficacy. PLoS Comput Biol 16(2): e1007688.Resistance to therapy due to tumor cell heterogeneity poses a major challenge to the use of cancer drugs. Cell-to-cell variability generates subpopulations of drug-tolerant cells that diminish therapeutic efficacy, even in populations of cells that are scored as highly sensitive based on drug potency. Overcoming such heterogeneity and blocking subpopulations of drug-tolerant cells motivate efforts toward identifying efficacious combination therapies. The success of these efforts depends on our ability to distinguish how heterogeneous populations of cells respond to individual drugs, and how these responses are inf...