To investigate the behavior of mechanomyogram (MMG) and electromyogram (EMG) signals in the time and frequency domains during sustained isometric contraction, MMG and surface EMG were obtained simultaneously from four muscles: upper trapezius (TP), anterior deltoid (DL), biceps brachii (BB), and brachioradialis (BR) of 10 healthy male subjects. Experimental conditions consisted of 27 combinations of 9 postures [3 shoulder angles (SA): 0 degree, 30 degrees, 60 degrees and 3 elbow angles (EA): 120 degrees, 90 degrees, 60 degrees] and 3 contraction levels: 20%, 40%, and 60% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Subjective evaluations of fatigue were also assessed using the Borg scale at intervals of 60, 30, and 10 sec at 20%, 40%, and 60% MVC tests, respectively. The mean power frequency (MPF) and root mean square (RMS) of both signals were calculated. The current study found clear and significant relationships among physiological and psychological parameters on the one hand and SA and EA on the other. EA's effect on MVC was found to be significant. SA had a highly significant effect on both endurance time and Borg scale. In all experimental conditions, significant correlations were found between the changes in MPF and RMS of EMG in BB with SA and EA (or muscle length). In all four muscles, MMG frequency content was two or three times lower than EMG frequency content. During sustained isometric contraction, the EMG signal showed the well-known shift to lower frequencies (a continuous decrease from onset to completion of the contraction). In contrast, the MMG spectra did not show any shift, although its form changed (generally remaining about constant). Throughout the contraction, increased RMS of EMG was found for all tests, whereas in the MMG signal, a significant progressive increase in RMS was observed only at 20% MVC in all four muscles. This supports the hypothesis that the RMS amplitude of the MMG signal produced during contraction is highly correlated with force production. Possible explanations for this behavioral difference between the MMG and EMG signals are discussed.
The present study evaluates the potential mitigation of physical workload when using strap support for a portable device. The experiments were designed as consecutive sessions over a 2-h period. Electromyogram signals were recorded from four muscles of six subjects. The perceived level of fatigue on the whole body as well as in the shoulder, arm, lower back and legs was assessed using Borg's CR-10 scale. All subjects were tested under eight experimental conditions. Results indicated that the biceps brachii muscle displayed significantly lower activity with strap support than without a strap. In the experiments with and without a strap, different levels of force were imposed on the various muscles, which caused changes in the distribution of the physical load. Although the role of the strap might seem evident, using strap support did not always decrease the sensation of fatigue. However, for short-term tasks, using a strap may be recommended.
Due to the change of social conditions and economical and cultural aspects, user's expectation has been changed too. Today for users, satisfying the emotional and feeling needs towards products is most important point. The recent human psychological studies suggest that having an experience and good feeling with products is the main factor for making decisions. Hence, designers try to understand those hidden needs of people. In this way, they can make a special kind of user's satisfaction. During this process, all possible relationships between the user and the product and all factors that are involved in its interaction are analyzed. In the final stage, current technologies, user experiences, feelings and imaginations are applied in designing the product. The present article is about the different ways of involving the user in designing the products in order to open a new window, which causes specific vision and determines the hidden perspectives of the user desire and its environment.
The purpose of the present paper is to describe and evaluate the polynomial models for predicting the muscular work capacity of the upper limb during sustained holding tasks. This research was concerned with the relationship between indicators of performance, i.e., specific posture or specific level of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), and then modeling the functional data based on experimental results to estimate factors that may have an effect on task performance. To this end, we designed an experiment using 10 subjects in which each subject performed sustained isometric shoulder and elbow flexion endurance exercise under 27 conditions [3 shoulder angles (SA)x3 elbow angles (EA)x3 levels of %MVC]. Throughout all experiments, subjective perception of effort was assessed using the Borg scale, every 60, 30, and 10 s during the 20%, 40%, and 60% MVC tests, respectively. Proposal models were represented by three approaches: model A: estimation of endurance time (ET), with input variables such as SA, EA, and %MVC; model B: estimation of recommendation time (RT, the time during which the operator was able to maintain a position under the desired condition), with input variables such as SA, EA, %MVC, and required rate on the Borg scale; and model C: estimation of limit strength or %MVC, with input variables such as SA, EA, request limit time for work (LT), and required rate on the Borg scale. Statistical analysis indicated that the three proposal estimation models based on polynomial regression functions showed high significance (p<0.0001). The proposal models suggested and recommended the possibility of finding the best positions entailing the reduction and minimization of total muscular strain from manual material handling tasks in different work situations, with the consequent increase in work efficiency.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.